Predictors of clinical performance in comprehensive care cases in undergraduate dentists.

INTRODUCTION: Achieving a high grade in the final-year comprehensive clinical care (CCC) course is not only important for the individual candidate but also to ensure competency of students as they transition from dental school into independent practice. Here, we aimed to identify predictors of success in the CCC that might prove useful to identify which, if any, students need focused intervention to improve their performance in the CCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of two consecutive cohorts (2017-2018 and 2018-2019) of final-year (Year six) dental students (n = 180 females and n = 150 males) attending [King Abdulaziz University], Saudi Arabia. Age, gender, cumulative GPA to the start of Year six and assessment results were tabulated and analysed as independent variables in binary logistic regression to identify predictors of the final case grade (≤69% or >70%). RESULTS: Year five GPA (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.12; p = .004) and female gender (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.12-4.36; p = .02) were significantly associated with an increased odds of achieving a final case grade >70%. In particular, female students were over twice as likely as male students to achieve a higher score in their final case assessment. DISCUSSION: This study suggests that gender may influence final performance in the CCC. The better performance of females in the final CCC course than their male counterparts suggests that there may be a narrowing or even reversal of the historical gender gap in dental school performance. CONCLUSIONS: Both cognitive (GPA) and other (i.e. gender) factors influence clinical dental performance. Further work is required to establish what instructional modifications are required to accommodate these gender differences in CCC courses to pave the way for personalised teaching approaches to optimise educational outcomes.

Development of a novel integrated educational relative-unit value system to assess dental students' clinical performance.

PURPOSE: The use of relative unit values (RUVs) to assess students' clinical productivity is common in dental education. However, there are large variations on how RUVs are defined, developed, validated, and reported across institutions. This study described the development of a novel educational RUV system. METHODS: A preparatory phase of literature review and methodological gap analysis, followed by initial conception, pilot testing, and a 2-round modified Delphi process were conducted. Panelists reviewed the procedure list, nomenclature, purpose of development, basis of calculation of RUVs, and the relative weights of different dental procedures. Also, their perception of the usefulness, fairness, and practicality of the system was assessed. Agreement was set at 80%. RESULTS: Eight published educational RUV systems were identified. These data guided the initial conception of the novel Integrated Educational RUVs (IERUVs). Five experts reviewed the system and it was piloted for a full educational cycle. Feedback from faculty and students was used to adjust over- or under-estimated RUVs, with deconstruction of multi-step procedures. Fifteen experts participated in the second Delphi round (71% response rate). Consensus was reached for 105 procedural RUVs. A total of 93% of the panelists agreed the system was useful, while 71% perceived it as fair and practical. CONCLUSION(S): Content validity of the new educational RUV was established. The system provides a promising tool for assessing dental students' clinical performance, as it provides a unified base unit to assess clinical productivity, clinical competence, and comprehensive care cases. Longitudinal evaluations in different contexts are needed to confirm IERUVs validity.

Impact of Tooth Loss Position on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Adults Treated in the Community.

BACKGROUND: Tooth loss is known to have negative effects on both functional and psychological oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), but the impact of the position of the tooth loss (i.e. anterior or posterior) on the different psychosocial dimensions of OHRQoL has yet to be examined. Here, we examined how the position of lost teeth impacts the different dimensions of OHRQoL. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional epidemiological study of adults aged 18 years and older attending routine examinations at primary care dental centers in Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Demographic information was collected, and OHRQoL was assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) (Arabic form). Differences in total and subdomain OHIP-14 scores between individuals without tooth loss and those with ≥1 anterior or posterior missing teeth were assessed using Student's t-test, and analysis of covariance was used to assess the association between the presence and absence of missing teeth in each compartment and total and subdomain OHIP-14 scores after controlling for age, gender, and income. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of tooth loss was 76%. In multivariate analysis controlling for age, gender, and income as covariates, anterior missing teeth were significantly associated with higher OHIP-14 total, physical pain, physical disability, psychological disability, and social disability scores, accounting for 6%-12% of the score variance. However, posterior missing teeth were only associated with total OHIP-14 and functional limitations domain scores, accounting for 6% and 7% of the variance, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we show for the first time the impact of the location of missing teeth on different OHRQoL dimensions. Anterior tooth loss has a wide-ranging impact on both physical and psychosocial functioning compared to posterior tooth loss, suggesting that anterior tooth restoration should be prioritized when treatment planning. The position of lost teeth must be considered in addition to the number of losses when examining the impact of tooth loss and its treatment on OHRQoL.

Dimensions of Maxillary Lateral Incisor on the Esthetic Perception of Smile: A Comparative Study of Dental Professionals and the General Population.

AIM: To evaluate the effect of the differences in the dimensions of maxillary lateral incisor on the esthetic perception of smile among dental professionals and the general population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two sets of photographs where the maxillary incisor dimensions were modified using computer software (Adobe Photoshop) were created. In the first set, six images were included where the maxillary lateral incisor width was modified. The second set included five images where only the maxillary lateral incisor length was modified keeping the gingival margins same. Three groups of participants formed the sample. Hypodontia patients formed the first group, non-hypodontia patients formed the control group, while the dentists constituted to the third group. A total of 156 participants were recruited, 36 patients with radiographically confirmed hypodontia out of which 22 were female and 14 were male, 54 non-hypodontia "control" patients out of which 29 were female and 24 were male, and 66 dentists out of which 39 were female and 27 were male. Every participant had 15 seconds to view each photograph along with 30 seconds at the end for confirmation. RESULTS: The "most attractive smile" was the ones with 77% lateral incisor to central incisor width proportion according to 25.0% of the hypodontia group and 40.8% of the dentist's group, while only 4.2% of the control group agreed that it was the most attractive. However, the "least popular" was the 52% lateral incisor to central incisor width proportion according to 40.0% of patients who are hypodontic, 20.8% of participants from control group, and 49.0% of dentists. CONCLUSION: The golden proportion was not considered as the most attractive among all groups. The esthetic perceptions of the patients might not be same as that of the dentists. In general, reductions in the maxillary lateral incisor width were not all acceptable. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study will help us understand the different perceptions of the patients and the dentists on esthetics, which would further help us in planning the treatment accordingly.