First-line chemotherapy vs bowel tumor resection plus chemotherapy for patients with unresectable synchronous colorectal hepatic metastases.

HYPOTHESIS: Bowel resection followed by chemotherapy is a better management strategy than immediate chemotherapy in asymptomatic patients with colorectal cancer and unresectable liver-only metastases at presentation. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Sixty-five consecutive symptom-free colorectal cancer patients with unresectable synchronous metastases confined to the liver undergoing bowel tumor resection plus systemic chemotherapy (42 patients [resection group]) or chemotherapy first (23 patients [chemotherapy group]). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Long-term survival and identification of prognostic indicators of outcome. RESULTS: In the resection group, the mean and median overall survival times were shown to be significantly better than those in the chemotherapy group (P = .03). Performance status, basal serum levels of lactic dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase, percentage of liver involvement, potentially curative resection of the bowel tumor, and type of treatment (resection vs chemotherapy) were demonstrated to be the only variables significantly correlated with long-term survival. On multivariate analysis, performance status, extent of liver involvement, and type of treatment were shown to be the only covariates independently associated with survival rate. The rate of liver metastasis downstaging with subsequent curative hepatic resection was clearly associated with good performance status, limited liver involvement, and resection of the bowel tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving complete cure in asymptomatic colorectal cancer patients with unresectable synchronous liver-only metastases appears to be mostly the result of shrinkage and resection of hepatic metastases. In patients with good performance status and limited liver involvement, bowel tumor resection appears to be the best treatment option for this purpose.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression is associated with a worse prognosis in gastric cancer patients undergoing curative surgery.

BACKGROUND: In gastric cancer, the recurrence rate is high even after curative surgery. A relevant issue is the identification of independent prognostic factors to select high-risk patients; such features can be used as predictive factors for tailored therapies. In this study we have investigated the role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression as a prognostic marker for predicting cancer behavior and clinical outcome in gastric cancer patients undergoing potentially curative surgery. METHODS: Epidermal growth factor receptor determination using a commercially available immunohistochemistry (IHC) kit was performed in tissues from 82 gastric cancer patients receiving primary surgical treatment and in 25 normal gastric mucosa specimens from noncancer patients. The EGFR positivity was correlated with disease recurrence and survival in univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Forty-four percent (36 cases) of gastric cancers were EGFR positive. In 66 curatively treated patients, EGFR expression correlated with disease recurrence and poorer survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses. In a multivariate model for predicting recurrence and survival, advanced tumor extension (T(3) or T(4)), nodal metastases, and EGFR expression were the only independent covariates. In particular, EGFR expression was shown to be a significant predictor of poor prognosis among gastric cancer patients having the same stage according to the current TNM staging system. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that EGFR expression may be useful in identifying high-risk gastric cancer patients undergoing potentially curative surgery. Multimodal treatments should be considered in the adjuvant treatment of these patients.

Prognostic significance of epidermal growth factor receptor expression in colon cancer patients undergoing curative surgery.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression as a prognostic marker for prediction of cancer behavior and clinical outcomes in colon cancer patients undergoing potentially curative surgery. METHODS: EGFR determination using a commercially available immunohistochemistry kit was performed in tissues from 149 colon cancer patients receiving primary surgical treatment and in 25 normal colon mucosa specimens from noncancer patients. EGFR positivity was correlated in univariate and multivariate analyses with disease recurrence and survival. In addition, p27, p53, and vascular endothelial growth factor expression were assessed by immunohistochemistry in 104 patients and correlated with EGFR tumor expression and clinical outcome. RESULTS: EGFR expression was detected in approximately one third of colon cancer patients (53 of 149; 35.6%). In 126 curatively treated patients, EGFR expression was correlated with disease recurrence and worse survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses. In a multivariate model for predicting recurrence and survival, Dukes' staging, p27, and EGFR expression were the only independent covariates. In particular, in Dukes' A and B patients the 5-year survival probability was 96% for EGFR-negative and high p27 expression cases and was 30.7% for EGFR-positive and low p27 expression cases. CONCLUSIONS: EGFR expression was an independent prognostic indicator of disease recurrence and poor survival in colon cancer patients undergoing curative surgery. In the context of novel therapeutic options such as molecularly targeted therapies, these findings suggest that anti-EGFR drugs could be evaluated in the adjuvant treatment of EGFR-positive colon cancer patients.

p27 downregulation and metallothionein overexpression in gastric cancer patients are associated with a poor survival rate.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: As a significant number of curatively treated gastric cancer patients will ultimately relapse, there is an urgent need to investigate new prognostic markers for identification of high-risk patients. In this study, we investigated the possible role of molecular markers involved in cell cycle regulation (B1 and D3 cyclins, and p27) and cell protection (metallothionein, MT) in predicting tumor behavior and clinical outcome in gastric cancer patients. METHODS: Analysis of the above indicators was performed by immunohistochemistry on 73 gastric cancer patient samples and 25 normal gastric mucosa specimens. RESULTS: Normal gastric mucosa cells displayed low expressions of B1 and D3 cyclins and MT, and intense p27 staining. Conversely, gastric tumor cells showed higher cyclin D3 and MT, and lower p27 expressions. B1 cyclin expressions were not different between normal and tumor tissue. p27 and MT expressions were altered in almost all cancer samples, and were strongly correlated with tumor progression. Advanced extent of the primary tumor, nodal metastasis, low p27, and high MT expressions were the best combination of variables for prediction of poor clinical outcome. Each marker predicted outcome better than staging based on tumor-node (TNM) system. Survival and recurrence rates decreased as molecular alterations increased. Finally, molecular profile determination correctly predicted the prognosis in patients with same TNM stage. CONCLUSIONS: p27 and MT expressions strongly correlated with clinical outcome allowing to identify an unfavorable group of patients that may benefit from tailored treatments. The role of B1 and D3 cyclins in gastric cancer remains to be elucidated.

Prognostic value of p27, p53, and vascular endothelial growth factor in Dukes A and B colon cancer patients undergoing potentially curative surgery.

PURPOSE: Early-stage colon cancer patients (Dukes A or B; pT1-T3 pNO pMO) are excluded from adjuvant chemotherapy following potentially curative surgery because they are expected to have good long-term survival. However, 20 percent to 30 percent of these patients ultimately succumb from recurrent disease. This indicates that the conventional staging procedures may be unable to precisely predict cancer prognosis. METHODS: In 65 early-stage colon cancers, we investigated by immunohistochemistry the role of molecular markers such as p27, p53, and vascular endothelial growth factor in identifying high-risk patients who may benefit from adjuvant treatments. RESULTS: No clinicopathologic factor, namely Dukes stage, t parameter, number of resected nodes, and vascular or lymphatic invasion, was found be an independent significant predictor of disease-specific and disease-free survival. In contrast, each molecular marker predicted survival and recurrence rates much better than the conventional Dukes staging system. The best combination of variables for prediction of long-term outcome and recurrence rate included p27, p53, and vascular endothelial growth factor. Interestingly, the greater the number of molecular alterations, the lower the five-year estimated survival function. Nearly all cancer-related deaths were observed among patients whose colon cancers expressed all three molecular alterations. Regardless of Dukes stage, the recurrence rate was found to increase with the increase in the number of molecular alterations. Early-stage colon cancers expressing p27 down-regulation and high p53 and vascular endothelial growth factor immunoreactivity showed a 100 percent actuarial four-year recurrence rate. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of molecular alterations may be useful to identify a higher-risk group of early-stage colon cancer patients who may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Determination of molecular marker expression can predict clinical outcome in colon carcinomas.

PURPOSE: Conventional staging procedures are often unable to precisely predict prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC). In this study, we set out to investigate the possible role of molecular/structural indicators involved in cell cycle regulation (p27 and p53), apoptosis (p53 and p27), and tumor neoangiogenesis [p53, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and microvessel count] in predicting tumor behavior and clinical outcome in CRC patients EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Analysis of the above indicators was performed by immunohistochemistry on 104 CRC patient samples and 25 normal colon mucosa specimens. RESULTS: Intense p27 nuclear staining was found in normal colon mucosa, with p53 nuclear staining and VEGF cytoplasmic accumulation <10%, and low microvessel count. In contrast, in CRC samples, p27 was down-regulated in 53.8%, p53 protein was overexpressed in 52%, and VEGF stained positive in 67.3% of the cases, respectively. Multiple regression analysis showed that molecular markers were strongly correlated. In patients treated with curative surgery, a significant relationship was seen between p27 down-regulation and Dukes' stage, nodal status, and the presence of distant metastases. VEGF overexpression correlated significantly with Dukes' stage, tumor (t) and metastasis (m) parameters, and left site. Stepwise regression selected p27, p53, VEGF, and Dukes' stage as the best combination of variables capable of predicting both disease-specific and disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: The investigated indicators may be useful for the prediction of outcome and recurrence rate in curatively treated CRC patients. In conjunction with clinical and pathological staging, they may provide a stronger indication of clinical outcome than staging alone and help better select therapeutic options in CRC patients.

Circulating levels of interleukin-10 and interleukin-6 in gastric and colon cancer patients before and after surgery: relationship with radicality and outcome.

Elevated interleukin-10 (IL-10) and IL-6 serum levels in advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients have been shown previously. To investigate the behavior and the prognostic role of IL-10 and IL-6 serum levels in gastric and colon cancer patients undergoing surgery, we studied the relationship between these cytokine levels and surgical radicality and outcome. Seventy-eight patients with gastric or colon cancer were admitted to the study, and 50 underwent radical surgery. Cytokine serum levels were measured by ELISA the day before surgery and 16 days after surgery. Circulating levels of IL-10 and IL-6 were found to be higher in cancer patients than in controls. Both IL-10 and IL-6 serum levels were demonstrated to be able to predict likelihood to perform radical surgery. IL-10 serum levels returned to normal in all but 8 radically resected patients. These 8 patients had tumor recurrence. In contrast, IL-6 serum levels were shown to significantly decrease in all patients but not to normalize regardless of the radicality of the operation. On multivariate analysis, basal IL-10 serum levels were found to be among the variables significantly affecting the disease-free survival rate. Stepwise regression selected tumor stage, number of metastatic resected nodes, and basal IL-10 serum level as the best combination of variables for prediction of likelihood of tumor recurrence. Preoperative IL-10 serum levels may be a useful marker to predict likelihood of performing radical surgery. Abnormally high postoperative IL-10 values negatively affected disease-free survival and tumor recurrence. IL-6 serum levels were found to have a more limited prognostic role.

Prognostic significance of circulating IL-10 and IL-6 serum levels in colon cancer patients undergoing surgery.

The prognostic significance of IL-10 and IL-6 serum levels in colon cancer patients undergoing surgery was investigated. To this end, 50 candidate patients with colon cancer for surgery were admitted to the study. Of these, 30 could be subjected to a potentially curative surgery. Cytokine serum levels at several time points before and after surgery were measured by ELISA. Circulating levels of IL-10 and IL-6 were found to be elevated in cancer patients with respect to controls. Both IL-10 and IL-6 serum levels were demonstrated to predict the likelihood of curative surgery (predictive accuracy, 83.3%). IL-10 serum levels returned to normal in all but 6 patients who underwent curative surgery. These latter had tumor recurrence (predictive accuracy, 100%). In contrast, IL-6 serum levels significantly decreased in all patients, regardless of whether cure was surgically achieved, but did not normalize. On multivariate analysis, basal IL-10 serum levels were found to be among the variables significantly predicting the disease-free survival rate. Stepwise regression selected tumor stage, basal IL-10 serum level, and basal CEA serum level as the best combination of variables for prediction of the likelihood of tumor recurrence. In conclusion, preoperative serum levels of IL-10 were shown to be useful markers for predicting both likelihood to perform curative surgery and, in combination with the 16th postoperative day IL-10 serum levels, tumor recurrence (predictive accuracy, 73.6 and 96%, respectively). IL-6 serum levels were found to have a more limited prognostic role.