Emergency cervical cerclage in twin and singleton pregnancies with 0-mm cervical length or prolapsed membranes.

INTRODUCTION: Cervical cerclage is controversial in twin pregnancies, although recent data from the USA supports its use where "physical examination-indicated". Limited data exist, however, in the extreme situation of 0-mm ultrasound-measured cervical length or even prolapsed membranes. This research compares the success of emergency cervical cerclage in multiple and singleton pregnancies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of all such cerclages performed at a tertiary hospital over a 15-year period. "Emergency" was where transvaginal ultrasound-assessed cervical length was 0 mm, with amniotic membranes at or beyond the external cervical os. Exclusion criteria were clinical or biochemical evidence of infection, regular contractions, bleeding, ruptured membranes, or gestation beyond 24+0  weeks. The primary outcome, or "success", was defined as birth >27+6  weeks of gestation, with the neonate alive 28 days later with no markers of adverse outcome (seizures, periventricular leukomalacia, intracranial hemorrhage more than Grade 2, or necrotizing enterocolitis). Demographic and cerclage variables were assessed against the primary outcome. Variables correlated with success were analyzed between multiple and singleton pregnancies. Comparison of all adverse outcomes was then adjusted using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 135 pregnancies were included (107 singletons and 28 multiples [all twins]). Success was achieved in 79 (58.5%; 57.9% in singletons, 60.7% in twins). Nulliparity, in utero transfer, symptoms, prolapsed membranes, and dilation more than 3 cm were predictors of failure, but twin pregnancy was not. After controlling for potential confounding variables, there was no significant difference in measures of success between singleton and twin pregnancies, apart from higher rates of neonatal unit admission. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency cervical cerclage, even in extreme situations, is as effective in twin pregnancies as it is in singletons.

External cephalic version after previous cesarean section: A cohort study of 100 consecutive attempts.

OBJECTIVE: External cephalic version is commonly not performed in women with a previous cesarean section. Fear of uterine rupture and cesarean section in labor are prominent. The risks, however, of these are unclear. This study aims to document the safety and efficacy of external cephalic version in women with a prior cesarean section in a series of 100 consecutive attempts, and to perform a literature of the existing literature. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data of external cephalic version attempts in women at term with a previous cesarean section, and a literature review of previously published series. External cephalic version was performed by one of 3 experienced operators, with salbutamol tocolysis if appropriate, using ultrasound to visualize the fetal heart and place of fetal parts. RESULTS: 100 women with a prior cesarean section underwent external cephalic version over a 16-year period in one institution. 68% had no previous vaginal delivery. The external cephalic version success rate was 50%, and 30 (63.8%) of these subsequently delivered vaginally. There were no cases of uterine rupture or other complications. A literature review of series containing a total of 549 cases revealed no cases of uterine rupture or perinatal death. CONCLUSIONS: External cephalic version in women with a prior cesarean section is safe but enables a vaginal birth in only about a third of women.

Examination of the association between male gender and preterm delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To examine possible reasons why a male fetus constitutes a risk factor for preterm delivery. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of deliveries from hospital database in a UK teaching hospital. The population comprised all deliveries >23 weeks over an 11-year period, excluding multiples, terminations and pregnancies with major abnormalities including indeterminate gender. Obstetric variables and outcomes were initially compared in male and female babies for preterm births in different gestation bands, extreme (<28 weeks), severe (29-32 weeks) and moderate (33-36 weeks). For each, the odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for preterm delivery were calculated. Then, using binary logistic regression with adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, putative causal pathways that might explain the male excess were tested. RESULTS: 75,725 deliveries occurred, of which 4003 (5.3%) were preterm. Males delivered preterm more frequently (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06-1.20). This was due to spontaneous (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.19-1.42) but not iatrogenic (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.87-1.05) preterm birth. There was an increased risk of pre eclampsia among preterm females. Although males were larger, and male pregnancies were more frequently nulliparous and affected by some other obstetric complications (abruption, urinary tract infection), these did not account for their increased risk. Any effect of growth restriction could not be properly determined. CONCLUSIONS: Being male carries an increased risk of spontaneous but not iatrogenic preterm birth. The reasons behind this remain obscure.

The relationship between intrapartum maternal fever and neonatal acidosis as risk factors for neonatal encephalopathy.

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to investigate the relationship among maternal intrapartum fever, neonatal acidosis, and the risk of neonatal encephalopathy. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study of pregnancies at term. Logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of maternal fever and acidosis on the risk of neonatal encephalopathy. The potential interaction between maternal fever and acidosis was included in the models. RESULTS: Of 8299 women, 25 neonates (0.3%) had encephalopathy develop. These were more often born acidotic (adjusted odds ratio 11.5; 95% CI, 5.0-26.5) or after a maternal intrapartum fever (adjusted odds ratio 8.1; 95% CI, 3.5-18.6). Where both risk factors coexisted, the risk was 12.5% (adjusted odds ratio 93.9; 95% CI, 28.7-307.2). Although this effect is multiplicative, there was no evidence of statistical interaction (P = .93); the effect of maternal fever on the risk of encephalopathy was similar in infants with (adjusted odds ratio 8.7; 95% CI, 2.4-31.7) and without acidosis (adjusted odds ratio 7.4; 95% CI, 2.4-21.9). CONCLUSION: The combination of a maternal fever with cord acidosis greatly increases the risk of neonatal encephalopathy, but there is evidence against interaction between them, suggesting that they represent 2 separate causal pathways.