ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the impact of size of residual tumors as determined by postoperative computed tomography (CT) on survival of patients with advanced, high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC) who achieved residual disease less than 1 cm after primary debulking surgery (PDS). METHODS: We collected data of patients with stage III HGSC who had residual tumor less than 1 cm after PDS between 2013 and 2018. Surgeon-assessed residual disease during surgery was defined as sR0 (no gross residual) or sR1 (gross residual <1 cm), and radiologist-assessed residual disease on postoperative CT was defined as rR0 (no evidence of disease) or rRany (existing residual disease). All patients were classified into the following groups: sR0/rR0, sR1/rR0, sR0/rRany, and sR1/rRany. RESULTS: A total of 436 patients was placed into the sR0/rR0 (n = 187, 42.9%), sR1/rR0 (n = 59, 13.5%), sR0/rRany (n = 79, 18.1%), or sR1/rRany group (n = 111, 25.5%). Discrepancies between surgical and radiological assessments were recorded for 176 patients (40.4%) including 38 cases of sR1/rRany group with discordant residual tumor location indicated between two methods. During multivariate analysis, patients with ascites on preoperative CT, sR0/rRany group inclusion, and sR1/rRany group inclusion showed unfavorable progression-free and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of surgical and radiological evaluations for determining the size of residual tumors was more accurate than surgical evaluation only for predicting survival among patients with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent PDS to residual disease less than 1 cm.
