Molecular pathology quality control in Southeast Asia: Results of a multiregional quality assurance study from MASTER KEY Asia.

Tissue specimen quality assurance is a major issue of precision medicine for rare cancers. However, the laboratory standards and quality of pathological specimens prepared in Asian hospitals remain unknown. To understand the methods in Southeast Asian oncology hospitals and to clarify how pre-analytics affect the quality of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens, a questionnaire surveying pre-analytical procedures (Part I) was administered, quality assessment of immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining and DNA/RNA extracted from the representative FFPE specimens from each hospital (Part II) was conducted, and the quality of DNA/RNA extracted from FFPE of rare-cancer patients for genomic sequencing (Part III) was examined. Quality measurements for DNA/RNA included ΔΔCt, DV200, and cDNA yield. Six major cancer hospitals from Malaysia, Philippines, and Vietnam participated. One hospital showed unacceptable quality for the DNA/RNA assessment, but improved by revising laboratory procedures. Only 57% (n = 73) of the 128 rare-cancer patients' specimens met both DNA and RNA quality criteria for next-generation sequencing. Median DV200 was 80.7% and 64.3% for qualified and failed RNA, respectively. Median ΔΔCt was 1.25 for qualified and 4.89 for failed DNA. Longer storage period was significantly associated with poor DNA (fail to qualify ratio = 1579:321 days, p < 0.001) and RNA (fail to qualify ratio = 1070:280 days, p < 0.001). After improvement of pre-analytical factors, the qualification rate increased for hospitals A and E from 41.5% to 70.5% and 62.5% to 86%, respectively. This is the first report to elucidate the pre-analytical laboratory procedures of main Southeast Asian oncology hospitals. An external quality assessment program may improve factors associated with tumor FFPE specimen quality.

The impact of obesity and endocrine therapy on the prognosis of premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: A single-institute retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Higher body mass index (BMI) is associated with worse prognosis in pre- and postmenopausal patients with breast cancer (BC). However, there is insufficient evidence regarding the optimal adjuvant endocrine therapy for obese premenopausal women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive BC. AIM: To evaluate the impact of obesity and adjuvant endocrine therapy on prognosis in premenopausal patients with BC. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical record of premenopausal women who received curative surgery for clinical stage I-III HR-positive BC from 2007 to 2017. Patients were classified into five groups according to BMI: underweight (UW), normal weight (NW), obese 1 degree (OB1), obese 2 degree (OB2), and obese 3 degree (OB3) categories. The primary analysis was a comparison of BC-specific survival (BCSS) according to BMI (UW/NW vs. OB1-3) and adjuvant endocrine therapy (with or without ovarian function suppression [OFS]). Of 13 021 patients, the data of 3380 patients were analyzed. BCSS in OB1-3 patients was significantly worse than that in patients with UW/NW (hazard ratio [HR] 2.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40-4.02: p = .0009). In OB1-3 patients who received tamoxifen (TAM), BCSS was significantly worse than that in UW/NW patients (p = .0086); however, a significant difference was not shown in patients who received TAM and OFS (p = .0921). CONCLUSION: High BMI was associated with worse prognosis in premenopausal patients with HR-positive BC who received adjuvant TAM. The role of OFS as adjuvant endocrine therapy remains unclear, and further studies are required to explore the adequate management of obese premenopausal patients.

Assessment of a cancer genomic profile test for patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Comprehensive cancer genomic profile (CGP) tests are being implemented under Japanese universal health insurance system. However, the clinical usefulness of CGP test for breast cancer patients has not been evaluated. Of the 310 patients who underwent CGP testing at our institution between November 2019 and April 2021, 35 patients with metastatic breast cancer whose treatment strategy was discussed by our molecular tumor board within the study period were investigated after exclusion of 2 cases that could not be analyzed. The turn-around time, drug accessibility, and germline identification detection were evaluated. The subtype was luminal in 20 patients (57.1%), triple-negative in 12 patients (34.3%), and luminal-HER2 in 3 patients (8.6%). Actionable gene mutations were detected in 30 patients (85.7%), and 7 patients (20.0%) were recommended for clinical trial participation, with the drug administered to 2 patients (5.7%). Three patients (8.6%) died due to disease progression before the test results were disclosed. We report the results of an initial assessment of the utility of CGP testing for patients with metastatic breast cancer under Japanese universal health insurance system. Conducting CGP tests at a more appropriate time could provide patients with greater benefit from treatments based on their specific gene mutations.

Serial circulating tumor DNA monitoring of CDK4/6 inhibitors response in metastatic breast cancer.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) significantly improve progression-free survival and have become the standard therapy for estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients. Treatment surveillance by radiological imaging has some limitations in detection and repeated biopsy genomic profiling is not clinically feasible. Serial circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis may provide insights into treatment response. Here we performed serial ctDNA analysis (n = 178) on 33 patients. Serial ctDNA analysis identified disease progression with sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 92%. In eight of 12 patients (61%) responding to CDK4/6i who eventually developed progressive disease, serial sampling every 3 or 6 months captured the initial rise of ctDNA with an average lead time of 3 months. In three of eight patients that did not respond to CDK4/6i (progressive disease at first radiological assessment, 3 months), biweekly sequencing within the first cycle of CDK4/6i treatment (1 month) detected sustained ctDNA levels (≥0.2% variant allele frequency), with lead time of 2 months. Serial ctDNA analysis tracked RECIST response, including clinically challenging scenarios (bone metastases or small-sized target lesions), as well as detecting acquired genetic alterations linked to CDK4/6i resistance in the G1 to S transition phase. Circulating tumor DNA analysis was more sensitive than carcinoembryonic antigen or cancer antigen 15-3 serum tumor markers at monitoring tumor response to CDK4/6i treatment. Our findings indicated the possible clinical utility of serial ctDNA analysis for earlier progressive disease detection and real-time monitoring of CDK4/6i response.

Trastuzumab and fulvestrant combination therapy for women with advanced breast cancer positive for hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2: a retrospective single-center study.

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab and fulvestrant combination therapy is one of the treatment options for patients with hormone receptor- and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer; however, there are limited studies evaluating the efficacy of this combination therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of women with hormone receptor- and HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who received trastuzumab and fulvestrant combination therapy between August 1997 and August 2020 at the Cancer Institute Hospital. The primary endpoint of this study was progression-free survival, and the secondary endpoints were response rate, overall survival and safety. RESULTS: We reviewed the data of 1612 patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, of which 118 patients were diagnosed with hormone receptor- and HER2-positive breast cancer. Of these, 28 patients who received trastuzumab and fulvestrant combination therapy were eligible for this study. The median treatment line for advanced breast cancer was 6 (range, 1-14), the median progression-free survival was 6.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.46-8.17), and the median overall survival was 35.3 months (95% CI, 20.0-46.7). Of the 28 patients, partial response was observed in 1 (4%), stable disease in 17 (61%), and progressive disease in 10 (36%) patients. The disease control rate was 64%. Adverse events of grade ≥ 3 were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Trastuzumab and fulvestrant combination therapy showed moderate clinical efficacy and no severe toxicity after standard anti-HER2 treatment, which is a reasonable treatment option for patients with hormone receptor- and HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. These data contribute to understanding the efficacy of trastuzumab and fulvestrant combination therapy as control data for further development of anti-HER2 agents plus hormone therapy.

Myocardial dysfunction caused by abemaciclib: a case report.

A 68-year-old female patient with metastatic breast cancer presented 12 weeks after starting chemotherapy with abemaciclib and fulvestrant with breathlessness, peripheral edema, and weight gain. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and troponin I levels were raised above normal, and chest radiography revealed an increase in the cardiothoracic ratio from 47% before chemotherapy to 55%. The transthoracic echocardiogram showed a reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction from 76% before chemotherapy to 68%. Contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed delayed accumulation in the interventricular septum. Under the diagnosis of abemaciclib-induced myocardial dysfunction and heart failure, abemaciclib was discontinued, and enalapril and furosemide were started. Two months later, imaging revealed a cardiothoracic ratio of 47% with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 73%. A cardiac MRI after three months was normal. This case report demonstrates that cardiac dysfunction caused by abemaciclib is reversible if detected early and treated appropriately.

A Phase II study of the safety and efficacy of lenvatinib in patients with advanced thyroid cancer.

AIM: To investigate the safety and efficacy of lenvatinib in advanced thyroid cancer. PATIENTS/METHODS: In this Phase II study, 51 Japanese patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC), medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) or anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) received once-daily lenvatinib 24 mg. The primary end point was safety. RESULTS: All patients experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE); only one patient experienced an AE leading to discontinuation. The most common any-grade AEs were hypertension, decreased appetite, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, fatigue and proteinuria. Response rates for RR-DTC: 68%; MTC: 22%; ATC: 24%. Median progression-free survival for RR-DTC: 25.8 months; MTC: 9.2 months; ATC: 7.4 months. CONCLUSION: Lenvatinib demonstrated a manageable safety profile, proven antitumor activity in RR-DTC and promising efficacy in MTC and ATC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT01728623.

Lenvatinib for Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib has been approved by regulatory agencies in Japan, the United States, and the European Union for treatment of radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC). Thyroid cancer, however, is a clinically diverse disease that includes anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC), the subtype associated with the highest lethality. Effective therapy for ATC is an unmet need. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase 2, single-arm, open-label study in patients with thyroid cancer, including ATC, RR-DTC, and medullary thyroid cancer was conducted from 3 September 2012 to 9 July 2015. Patients received lenvatinib 24 mg daily until disease progression or development of unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety, and the secondary endpoint was efficacy, as assessed by progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate. RESULTS: At data cutoff, 17 patients with ATC were enrolled. All experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). The most frequent TEAEs were decreased appetite (82%), hypertension (82%), fatigue (59%), nausea (59%), and proteinuria (59%). Of note, only one patient required lenvatinib withdrawal because of a TEAE, and this TEAE was considered unrelated to lenvatinib. The median PFS was 7.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7-12.9], the median OS was 10.6 months (95% CI: 3.8-19.8), and the objective response rate was 24%. CONCLUSION: In this study, lenvatinib demonstrated manageable toxicities with dose adjustments and clinical activity in patients with ATC. This clinical activity of lenvatinib warrants further investigation in ATC. CLINICALTRIALSGOV: NCT01728623.

Predictive factors of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patient tolerance to high-dose cisplatin in concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Although high-dose cisplatin is the standard regimen of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), varying levels of patient tolerance towards cisplatin have been reported, and the predictive factors of cisplatin tolerance remain to be elucidated. The present study retrospectively reviewed newly diagnosed HNSCC patients who received CCRT. Cisplatin (80 mg/m2) was administered every 3 weeks. The proportion of high-dose cisplatin-tolerant patients (cumulative cisplatin dose, ≥200 mg/m2) was determined, and the predictive factors of cisplatin tolerance were analyzed in a logistic regression analysis. Between June 2006 and March 2013, a total of 159 patients were treated with CCRT. The median follow-up time was 36.7 months. A total of 73 patients (46%) tolerated a cumulative cisplatin dose ≥200 mg/m2; male gender [odds ratio (OR), 25.00; P=0.005] and high body surface area (BSA) (>1.80 m2; OR, 2.21; P=0.032) were significantly predictive of high-dose cisplatin tolerance. The high-dose cisplatin-tolerant patients had a significantly higher complete response (CR) rate (82 vs. 67%, P=0.045); however, there were no significant between-group differences in the 3-year OS (79.5 vs. 81.2%, P=0.59) or PFS (70.4 vs. 44.6%, P=0.076) by cisplatin tolerance. In clinical practice, approximately one-half of the patients tolerated high-dose cisplatin in CCRT. Male gender and high BSA could be predictive of cisplatin tolerance.

Differences in the responses to pazopanib and the prognoses of soft tissue sarcomas by their histological eligibility for the PALETTE study.

OBJECTIVE: In Japan, pazopanib has been made available to soft tissue sarcoma patients, also to patients histologically diagnosed as ineligible for the international Phase 3 study (PALETTE). However, clinical evidence for the use of pazopanib in PALETTE-ineligible patients is currently insufficient. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of soft tissue sarcoma patients treated with pazopanib at our institute. By pathological review, the patients' eligibility for the PALETTE study was evaluated and the differences in their responses to pazopanib and incidences of adverse events were investigated. RESULTS: From November 2012 to August 2014, a total of 47 patients received pazopanib, 38 (81%) of whom were histologically eligible for the PALETTE study, and 9 of whom (19%) were not. The median follow-up time was 7.5 months (range 1.4-20.3 months). An objective response was observed in both groups, but the patients' survival tended to be longer in the PALETTE-eligible patients; median progression-free survival was 4.5 months vs. 2.9 months (P = 0.15) and overall survival was 10.7 months vs. 7.8 months (P = 0.55), though these differences were not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events by PALETTE eligibility, but dose skipping or dose reduction was more likely to be observed in PALETTE-ineligible patients. CONCLUSION: Pazopanib is tolerable to soft tissue sarcoma patients ineligible for the PALETTE study and some of them respond to pazopanib, but the prognoses of patients ineligible for the PALETTE study might be worse than those of PALETTE-eligible patients. The indication of pazopanib for soft tissue sarcoma patients with PALETTE-ineligible histologies should be decided carefully.