ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) is a valid and reliable 40- item scale used to assess of pervasive developmental disorders (PDDs). The aim of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of the SCQ-Turkish Form (SCQ-TF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 100 children and adolescents aged 4-18 years 50 were diagnosed as PDD and 50 were diagnosed with intellectual disability (ID) based on DSM-IV-TR criteria. The consistency, test-retest reliability, content validity, and discriminant validity of SCQ-TF for the groups in the study sample were evaluated. SCQ-TF was compared to the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS), Autism Behavioural Checklist (ABC), and Clinical Global Impression Severity of Illness (CGI-SI). The most appropriate SCQ-TF cut-off point was determined via ROC analysis. RESULTS: The 4-factor structure of SCQ-TF accounted for 43% of the observed total variance. Correlations between the Social Communication Questionnaire -Turkish Form and the other measures were significant. The Cronbach's alpha value for the SCQ-TF total score was 0.80. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) varied between 0.87 and 0.96, and the cut-off point was 15. CONCLUSION: The findings show that SCQ-TF is valid and reliable for use in Turkey in those aged 4-18 years.
Subject(s)
Autistic Disorder/psychology , Communication , Psychometrics , Adolescent , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child Health Services , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , TurkeyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Structural neuroimaging studies in bipolar disorder (BD) have consistently identified several anatomical abnormalities in many brain areas related to mood regulation. Hippocampus is one of the key components of emotional regulatory networks in the brain. Evidence about hippocampal changes in BD is quite limited and inconsistent particularly for adolescent onset BD. It is aimed to compare hippocampus volumes of euthymic BD-I adolescents with healthy controls using structural MRI. METHODS: Hippocampal volumes of seventeen youths between 13 and 19 age period with DSM-IV BD (seven boys) and twelve healthy comparison subjects (five boys) were compared using structural MRI. Differences in hippocampal volumes between groups were tested. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the right and left hippocampus volumes of patients with BD and the control group. However boys tended to have significantly larger right hippocampal volumes than girls both in BD and control group. Right hippocampal volumes were enlarged in lithium treated bipolar patients. This enlargement is not related to sex. LIMITATIONS: Future, longitudinal follow-up studies need large enough sample sizes of both sexes and a sex-matched healthy comparison group to sort out developmental, gender and medication influences on brain structures over time in BD. CONCLUSIONS: Lithium treatment in adolescent-onset BD has a significant effect on hippocampus volumes.
