The use of tantalum cones and diaphyseal-engaging stems in tibial component revision: a consecutive series.

INTRODUCTION: Revision knee arthroplasty presents a number of challenges, including management of bone loss. The goal in managing moderate to large bone defects is fixation that is sufficient enough to allow early weight-bearing. The purpose of this study was to describe the surgical technique and clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients treated with porous tantalum metaphyseal cones in combination with long uncemented diaphyseal-engaging stems to manage tibial bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six aseptic revision TKAs were performed at our institution between 2016 and 2019 by two senior authors. A single trabecular metal tantalum cone combined with a long (100 or 155 mm) press fit, diaphyseal-engaging stem was used in all cases to reconstruct metaphyseal bone defects and to augment tibial fixation. Cemented stems were excluded. The tibiofemoral angle was measured along the tibial and femoral shaft axes on the weight-bearing anteroposterior radiograph at final follow-up (range 15-56 months). All clinical and surgical complications, reoperations, and revisions of any component were recorded. Survivorship free of revision was evaluated at the time of the latest follow-up. RESULTS: The mean Knee Society Score (KSS) and Knee Society Function Score (KSS-F) improved significantly from 29.7 points preoperatively (range 11-54 points) to 86 points (range 43-99 points) and from 20.4 points preoperatively (range 0-55 points) to 72.3 points (range 30-90 points) (p < 0.05), respectively. Eleven tibial constructs (30.5%) had incomplete, nonprogressive radiolucent lines (≤ 2 mm). All tibial cones demonstrated osteointegration. One patient underwent a full revision for periprosthetic joint infection, and survivorship free of any component revision was 91.7% at final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid fixation with uncemented diaphyseal-engaging stems and porous tantalum metaphyseal cones resulted in radiographic lack of osteolysis, good clinical outcomes, and survivorship of 91.7% at a median follow-up of 33 months when considering all-cause revision as the endpoint.

Short-term clinical outcome of not-fixed posterolateral fragment for tibial plateau fractures.

BACKGROUND: Tibial plateau fractures pose multiple challenges to the surgeon given their frequent intra-articular involvement and the tendency to displace under axial load. The aim of this study is to de-scribe the clinical outcomes of a retrospective case series in which tibial plateau fractures were not treated with PL fragment osteosynthesis. METHODS: In the present retrospective study, we included patients treated for tibial plateau fracture with PL fragment in our department from January 2016 to January 2020. All patients were seen at the outpa-tient clinic 2 and 5 weeks after surgery, and at 3, 6 and 12 months, and thereafter at regular intervals, depending on the overall clinical status. Every patient included in this study was then contacted by phone to assess self-reported clinical outcomes. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) questionnaire was used to assess functional outcomes. Patients were divided in six groups depending on the three-column classification by Lou (groups A1-A6). Patients were also divided in four groups based on the whole area of the PL column and on the depression of the PL fragment (group B1-B4). One-way ANOVA was used to compare groups of patients. RESULTS: OKS scores, extension and step-off of the PL fragment were analyzed in groups A1 - A6. No significant differences between OKS scores and step-off were found, while statistical difference was found between surfaces of PL fragment. No significant difference was found between OKS scores in groups B1-B4. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the treatment outcome is influenced not only by the superficial involvement or collapse of PL fragments, but also by other variables, including BMI, pre-injury physi-cal health, and age.

A combined paratricipital and triceps-splitting approach for distal humeral metaphyseal-diaphyseal fractures in adults.

BACKGROUND: Distal metaphyseal-diaphyseal fractures of the hume-rus can be challenging. The success lies in achieving a stable fixation that could allow early functional recovery. Our aim is to combine dif-ferent approaches already reported, to obtain an ideal surgical strategy for treating these fracture patterns. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we present the clinical outco-me of a 12-patient cohort in which we used a combined paratricipital and triceps-splitting approach to the distal humerus. The mean age of the group was 50 years (range 17 - 88). Clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery and thereafter, depending on the necessity of a further control. Patients' range of motion (ROM) of the elbow was reported, and functional outcome was assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI).The minimum follow-up was fixed at 12 months. RESULTS: Union was achieved in all fractures. After a median follow-up of 15.7 months (range 12-21), none of the patients complained of any limitation in daily activities. The ROM at the last follow-up was complete in eight patients. Instead, three patients had ROM limitations, but none of them mentioned limitations in the activities of daily living. We observed a single iatrogenic radial nerve palsy undergoing a full functional recovery at the final follow-up. No further complications occurred. CONCLUSION: We believe that the here presented modified approach could represent a solution that meets the modern demands for both ro-bust fixation and early mobilization, with minimal soft tissues damage around distal humeral fractures.

Resuming elective hip and knee arthroplasty after the first phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: the European Hip Society and European Knee Associates recommendations.

PURPOSE: The Covid-19 pandemic has disrupted health care systems all over the world. Elective surgical procedures have been postponed and/or cancelled. Consensus is, therefore, required related to the factors that need to be in place before elective surgery, including hip and knee replacement surgery, which is restarted. Entirely new pathways and protocols need to be worked out. METHODS: A panel of experts from the European Hip Society and European Knee Association have agreed to a consensus statement on how to reintroduce elective arthroplasty surgery safely. The recommendations are based on the best available evidence and have been validated in a separate survey. RESULTS: The guidelines are based on five themes: modification and/or reorganisation of hospital wards. Restrictions on orthopaedic wards and in operation suite(s). Additional disinfection of the environment. The role of ultra-clean operation theatres. Personal protective equipment enhancement. CONCLUSION: Apart from the following national and local guidance, protocols need to be put in place in the patient pathway for primary arthroplasty to allow for a safe return.

Recommendations for resuming elective hip and knee arthroplasty in the setting of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: the European Hip Society and European Knee Associates Survey of Members.

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the health care system around the entire globe. A consensus is needed about resuming total hip and knee procedures. The European Hip Society (EHS) and the European Knee Association (EKA) formed a panel of experts that have produced a consensus statement on how the safe re-introduction of elective hip and knee arthroplasty should be undertaken. METHODS: A prospective online survey was done among members of EHS and EKA. The survey consisted of 27 questions. It includes basic information on demographics and details the participant's agreement with each recommendation. The participant could choose among three options (agree, disagree, abstain). Recommendations focussed on pre-operative, peri-operative, and post-operative handling of patients and precautions. RESULTS: A total of 681 arthroplasty surgeons participated in the survey, with 479 fully completing the survey. The participants were from 44 countries and 6 continents. Apart from adhering to National and Local Guidelines, the recommendations concerned how to make elective arthroplasty safe for patients and staff. CONCLUSION: The survey has shown good-to-excellent agreement of the participants with regards to the statements made in the recommendations for the safe return to elective arthroplasty following the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Insall-Burstein II prosthesis: a 5- to 9-year follow-up study in osteoarthritic knees.

We prospectively studied 100 Insall-Burstein Posterior Stabilized II total knee arthroplasties (Zimmer Inc, Warsaw, IN) consecutively implanted in 91 patients with osteoarthritis. We reviewed 92 knees in 85 patients at a mean follow-up of 7.5 years (range, 5.3-9.5 years). According to the Knee Society score, 78 (85%) results were excellent, 11 (12%) were good, and 3 (3%) were fair or poor. The unsatisfactory results were attributed to patellofemoral pain with a low patella (2 knees) and to valgus alignment and medial laxity (1 knee). Flexion at follow-up averaged 116 degrees. Nonprogressive radiolucent lines were present around 30% of the tibial components. There was only 1 small osteolytic lesion around the tibial plateau. We observed no aspetic loosening, infection, or patella stress fracture. Survivorship analysis in the worst-case scenario showed a 90.9% success rate at 8 years.

Patella resurfacing in total knee replacement: functional evaluation and complications.

Three different knee replacements, with three trochlear designs, were prospectively evaluated clinically and radiographically for patellar function and presence of patellar complications. They included the Insall-Burstein (IB) I and the IB-II (posterior cruciate ligament substituting) and the Meniscal Bearing Knee (MBK; posterior cruciate ligament recession). The trochlea of the IB-I was short and shallow with an anterior sharp edge of the intercondylar box (later modified to a smoother edge) and the femoral component had a prominent "shoulder." In the IB-II the trochlea was deeper to allow for soft tissue clearance. In the MBK the trochlea was more prolonged, with R and L components and the "shoulder" was less prominent. In all the cases the patella was resurfaced with an all polyethylene dome prosthesis. Knees with tibiofemoral problems were excluded. From the data of the present study the following conclusions can be drawn: (a) The most frequent problem was impingement (clunks) with the early version of the IB-I. Smoothening of the anterior edge significantly reduced the incidence of clunks to 5% in the modified IB I. (b) With the IB-II deepening the trochlea for soft tissue clearance improved the degree, not the incidence of clunks (4.5%), compared to the modified IB I. (c) With the MBK clunks were very rare and patellar function improved. (d) Throughout the three series patellar stress fractures and instability were rare and loosening or wear not evident. (e) Normal function (including stairs ascending and descending) can be expected in over 80% of category A patients. (f) Of the various radiological parameters only patella baja was correlated with symptoms in the IB prostheses. (g) We still prefer the dome design because is more tolerant and with cold flow may better conform to the trochlea increasing contact area.