Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Rev Esp Cardiol ; 55(10): 1052-6, 2002 Oct.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12383390

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The influence of coronary artery revascularization on the control of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with chronic myocardial infarction is uncertain. However, ablation of the arrhythmogenic circuit in these patients by aneurysm resection is useful for controlling ventricular arrhythmias. We made a prospective analysis of our clinical strategy in patients who were candidates for coronary artery revascularization and/or aneurysmectomy to determine its influence on the recurrence of ventricular arrhythmias. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Prospective study of 17 consecutive patients with chronic myocardial infarction and ventricular arrhythmias unrelated with an acute ischemic event, who had coronary artery disease and/or ventricular aneurysm susceptible to aggressive treatment. We evaluated our clinical strategy and the recurrence of ventricular arrhythmias during a mean follow-up period of 33.64 months. RESULTS: Two groups of patients were studied: patients with ventricular aneurysm (group I: 12 patients) and patients without ventricular aneurysm (group II: 5 patients). Seven patients of group I underwent endoaneurysmorrhaphy and endocardial resection (4 of these patients had associated revascularization procedures). Three patients were not candidates for aneurysmectomy or revascularization procedures. Two patients underwent only revascularization procedures. All the patients in group II were revascularized. The patients who underwent aneurysmectomy did not have recurrence of arrhythmias. In 5 of the 6 patients who underwent programmed electrophysiological stimulation after aneurysmectomy, no sustained arrhythmia could be induced. Patients who were only revascularized had a high rate of recurrence of ventricular arrhythmias (57%), which were inducible after revascularization. CONCLUSION: Aneurysmectomy and endocardial resection constituted, in our experience, an effective tool for controlling ventricular arrhythmias associated with left ventricular aneurysm. Coronary artery revascularization in patients with ventricular arrhythmias and chronic myocardial infarction probably does not prevent the recurrence of ventricular arrhythmias.


Subject(s)
Defibrillators, Implantable , Heart Aneurysm/surgery , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Myocardial Revascularization , Tachycardia, Ventricular/prevention & control , Ventricular Fibrillation/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Chronic Disease , Coronary Angiography , Electrophysiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Aneurysm/complications , Heart Aneurysm/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Tachycardia, Ventricular/etiology , Tachycardia, Ventricular/physiopathology , Tachycardia, Ventricular/therapy , Time Factors , Ventricular Fibrillation/etiology , Ventricular Fibrillation/physiopathology , Ventricular Fibrillation/therapy
2.
Rev. esp. cardiol. (Ed. impr.) ; 55(10): 1052-1056, oct. 2002.
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-15127

ABSTRACT

Introducción y objetivos. La influencia de la revascularización coronaria en el control de las arritmias ventriculares, en pacientes con infarto de miocardio crónico, es incierta y el control de éstas es más evidente cuando se consigue resecar el circuito arritmogénico de un aneurisma. En este sentido, revisamos prospectivamente nuestra estrategia clínica en estos pacientes subsidiarios de revascularización coronaria y/o aneurismectomía con el objetivo de comprobar su influencia en la recurrencia de la arritmia. Pacientes y método. Estudio prospectivo de 17 pacientes consecutivos con infarto de miocardio crónico y arritmias ventriculares no relacionadas con isquemia aguda, que presentaban enfermedad coronaria y/o aneurisma ventricular subsidiario de tratamiento intervencionista. Se analiza la estrategia desarrollada y la recurrencia de las arritmias ventriculares a lo largo de un seguimiento de 33,64 meses de media. Resultados. Se consideraron 2 grupos de pacientes, según presentaran (grupo I) o no (grupo II) aneurisma de ventrículo izquierdo. De los 12 pacientes del grupo I, en siete se realizó endoaneurismorrafia y resección endocárdica (además, cuatro fueron revascularizados). Tres pacientes no fueron intervenidos por presentar un aneurisma no resecable y no ser subsidiario de revascularización. Dos pacientes sólo fueron revascularizados. Todos los pacientes del grupo II (5 pacientes sin aneurisma) fueron revascularizados. Los enfermos sometidos a aneurismectomía no tuvieron recurrencia de la arritmia, y ésta no se indujo en cinco de los 6 pacientes a los que se realizó estudio electrofisiológico postintervención. Los pacientes exclusivamente revascularizados presentaron una alta recurrencia arrítmica (57 por ciento) y su arritmia podía ser inducible tras la revascularización. Conclusiones. La aneurismectomía complementada con resección endocárdica constituyó, según nuestra experiencia, una eficaz herramienta para el control de las arritmias ventriculares asociadas a aneurisma de ventrículo izquierdo. La revascularización coronaria en pacientes con arritmias ventriculares e infarto de miocardio crónico no parece influir en la prevención de recurrencia arrítmica (AU)


Subject(s)
Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Male , Female , Humans , Myocardial Revascularization , Defibrillators, Implantable , Ventricular Fibrillation , Time Factors , Tachycardia, Ventricular , Coronary Angiography , Myocardial Infarction , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents , Chronic Disease , Electrophysiology , Heart Aneurysm , Follow-Up Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...