Phase 2 clinical trial of intrathecal topotecan in children with refractory leptomeningeal leukemia: a Children's Oncology Group trial (P9962).

PURPOSE: We performed a phase 2 study in children with recurrent or refractory leptomeningeal leukemia to determine the objective response rate after treatment with intrathecal (IT) topotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received age-adjusted IT topotecan (0.4 mg/dose for patients >3 years of age) administered twice weekly (every 3-4 days) for 6 weeks during induction, weekly for 4 weeks during consolidation, and twice monthly for 4 months and then monthly thereafter during maintenance. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients enrolled in the study, of whom 20 were eligible and assessable for toxicity and 16 were assessable for response. Of 16 patients, 6 (38%) had a complete response, 8 (50%) had stable disease, and 2 (13%) had progressive disease. The median event-free survival time (95% CI) was 3.1 (1.6-10.3) months and the median overall survival time (95% CI) was 18.0 (7.3-38.3) months. Eight patients (40%) experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events. There were no grade 4 neurological events (Table III). Four patients experienced a total of 6 grade 3 neurological events including an olfactory seizure, a headache, transient grade 3 speech impairment, muscle weakness, motor neuropathy, and ataxia. Headache was the most common grade ≤2 neurologic event and two patients developed grade ≤2 arachnoiditis. CONCLUSION: IT administration of topotecan was tolerable on this dose and schedule. The majority of adverse events were mild to moderate, reversible side effects. Complete central nervous system remissions were achieved in a subset of children with recurrent or refractory central nervous system leukemia.

Pediatric phase I trial and pharmacokinetic study of dasatinib: a report from the children's oncology group phase I consortium.

UNLABELLED: PURPOSE Dasatinib is an orally available tyrosine kinase inhibitor with low nanomolar activity against SRC family kinases, BCR-ABL, c-KIT, EPHA2, and the PDGF-ß receptor. Dasatinib was found to have selective activity in several tumor models in the Pediatric Preclinical Testing Program. PATIENTS AND METHODS A phase I study of dasatinib in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors or imatinib-refractory, Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia was performed. Dose levels of 50, 65, 85, and 110 mg/m²/dose, administered orally twice daily for 28 days, with courses repeated without interruption, were studied. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed with the initial dose. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients (solid tumors, n = 28; chronic myeloid leukemia [CML], n = 9; acute lymphoblastic leukemia, n = 2) were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed at the 50, 65, and 85 mg/m² dose levels. At 110 mg/m², two of six patients experienced DLT including grade 2 diarrhea and headache. In children with leukemia, grade 4 hypokalemia (50 mg/m²), grade 3 diarrhea (85 mg/m²), and grade 2 creatinine elevation (50 mg/m²) were observed. DLT in later courses included pleural effusions, hemangiomatosis, and GI hemorrhage. There were three complete cytogenetic responses, three partial cytogenetic responses, and two partial/minimal cytogenetic responses observed in evaluable patients with CML. CONCLUSION Overall, drug disposition and tolerability of dasatinib were similar to those observed in adult patients.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunomodulatory effects of lenalidomide in children and adolescents with relapsed/refractory solid tumors or myelodysplastic syndrome: a Children's Oncology Group Phase I Consortium report.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated or recommended phase II dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunomodulatory effects of lenalidomide in children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cohorts of children with solid tumors received lenalidomide once daily for 21 days, every 28 days at dose levels of 15 to 70 mg/m(2)/dose. Children with MDS received a fixed dose of 5 mg/m(2)/dose. Specimens for PK and immune modulation were obtained in the first cycle. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients (46 solid tumor, three MDS), median age 16 years (range, 1 to 21 years), were enrolled, and 42 were fully assessable for toxicity. One patient had a cerebrovascular ischemic event of uncertain relationship to lenalidomide. DLTs included hypercalcemia at 15 mg/m(2); hypophosphatemia/hypokalemia, neutropenia, and somnolence at 40 mg/m(2); and urticaria at 55 mg/m(2). At the highest dose level evaluated (70 mg/m(2)), zero of six patients had DLT. A maximum-tolerated dose was not reached. No objective responses were observed. PK studies (n = 29) showed that clearance is faster in children younger than 12 years of age. Immunomodulatory studies (n = 26) showed a significant increase in serum interleukin (IL) -2, IL-15, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, natural killer (NK) cells, NK cytotoxicity, and lymphokine activated killer (LAK) cytoxicity, and a significant decrease in CD4(+)/CD25(+) regulatory T cells. CONCLUSION: Lenalidomide is well-tolerated at doses up to 70 mg/m(2)/d for 21 days in children with solid tumors. Drug clearance in children younger than 12 years is faster than in adolescents and young adults. Lenalidomide significantly upregulates cellular immunity, including NK and LAK activity.

Reasons for participation in optional pharmacokinetic studies in children with cancer: a Children's Oncology Group phase 1 consortium study.

PURPOSE: Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies provide critical information about the disposition of anticancer drugs in children. In the Children's Oncology Group (COG) Phase 1 Consortium, pharmacokinetic studies are usually optional. We surveyed the attitudes towards PK studies among subjects in phase 1 trials at COG institutions. METHODS: Subjects were eligible if they participated in a phase 1 anticancer drug study with optional PK studies within the 4 weeks, regardless of whether they agreed to participate in the PK studies. Staff provided demographics; subjects/parents completed a questionnaire. RESULTS: Fifty eligible subjects enrolled. Thirty-six (72%) of the 50 eligible subjects consented to participate in PK studies; 14 (25%) declined. The most common reasons for participating were "the results might help researchers learn more about the drug" and "results from the pharmacokinetic studies might help other children." The most common reasons for not participating were "having the samples drawn would mean spending extra time in the hospital," and "my child might have needed a separate IV catheter in order to participate." CONCLUSIONS: The majority of subjects identified altruistic motives for participation in PK studies. Subjects who did not participate in PK studies identified extra time and need for an extra IV as important concerns. Simple interventions like sending staff to the subjects' home to draw PK samples or drawing samples from existing catheters could increase the number of subjects who are willing to participate in PK studies.