Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Parasitol Res ; 116(10): 2683-2694, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28785847

ABSTRACT

Lymphatic filariasis (LF) affects 73 countries, causes morbidity and impedes socioeconomic development. We had found no difference in safety and micro (Mf) and macro filarial action of single-dose diethylcarbamazine (DEC) and DEC + albendazole (ABZ) in an F01 study done in India (year 2000). There was a programmatic need to evaluate safety and efficacy of multiple annual treatments (F02). Subjects (155) from the F01 study, meeting inclusion-exclusion criteria, were enrolled in F02 and treated with further two annual doses of DEC or DEC + ABZ. Efficacy was evaluated for Mf positivity by peripheral smear (PS) and nucleopore (NP) filter, circulating filarial antigen (CFA) and filarial dance sign (FDS) positivity and Mf count at yearly follow-up. Safety was assessed for 5 days after drug administration. Total of 139 subjects evaluated for efficacy (69 DEC and 70 DEC + ABZ group). Mf positivity prevalence declined progressively by 95% (PS), 66% (NP), and 95% (PS) and 86% (NP); CFA positivity prevalence declined by 15% and 9%; FDS by 100% each; Mf count declined by 75.5 and 76.9% with three annual treatment of DEC and DEC + ABZ, respectively. Addition of ABZ did not show any advantage over DEC given as three annual rounds for LF. DEC and DEC + ABZ were well tolerated. There was no correlation between result of CFA and FDS, (both claimed to be indicative of adult worm). Analysis of published studies and our data indicate that macrofilaricidal effect of DEC/DEC + ABZ may be seen in children and not adults, with three or more annual dosing.


Subject(s)
Albendazole/therapeutic use , Diethylcarbamazine/therapeutic use , Elephantiasis, Filarial/drug therapy , Filaricides/therapeutic use , Wuchereria bancrofti , Adult , Albendazole/administration & dosage , Albendazole/adverse effects , Animals , Antigens, Helminth/blood , Diethylcarbamazine/administration & dosage , Diethylcarbamazine/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination , Elephantiasis, Filarial/epidemiology , Female , Filaricides/administration & dosage , Filaricides/adverse effects , Humans , India/epidemiology , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Prevalence , Wuchereria bancrofti/immunology
2.
Indian J Med Microbiol ; 28(4): 295-8, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20966557

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Integrated counselling and testing centres (ICTC) provide counselling and blood testing facilities for HIV diagnosis. Oral fluid tests provide an alternative for people who do not want blood to be drawn. Also, it avoids the risk of occupational exposure. The goal of this study was to evaluate the utility of Calypte AWARE HIV-1/2 OMT antibody test as a screening test in an Indian setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out after ethics committee approval in 250 adult ICTC clients. Blood was collected and tested from these clients for HIV diagnosis as per routine policy and the results were considered as the gold standard. Also, after another written informed consent, oral fluid was collected from the clients and tested for the presence of HIV antibodies. Twenty five clients who had and 25 clients who had not completed their secondary school education (Group A and Group B, respectively) were also asked to perform and interpret the test on their own and their findings and experiences were noted. RESULT: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the oral fluid antibody test were 100%, 98.51%, 94.11% and 100%, respectively. Seventy six percent of clients preferred oral fluid testing. Group B found it difficult to perform the test as compared to Group A and this difference was statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: Oral fluid testing can be used as a screening test for HIV diagnosis; however, confirmation of reactive results by blood-based tests is a must.


Subject(s)
HIV Antibodies/blood , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV-1/immunology , HIV-2/immunology , Mass Screening/methods , Saliva/immunology , AIDS Serodiagnosis/methods , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , HIV Antibodies/analysis , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/virology , Humans , India , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
Indian J Med Microbiol ; 28(4): 290-4, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20966556

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To determine the prevalent subtypes of HIV-1 in serodiscordant couples. SETTING: Integrated Counselling and Testing Centre (ICTC), Department of Microbiology. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective pilot study. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty HIV-1 serodiscordant couples. INCLUSION CRITERIA: a) Documentation of HIV-1 infection in one partner and seronegative status in the other, current history of continued unprotected sexual activity within the partnership, demonstration that they have been in a partnership for at least 1 year and are not currently on highly active antiretroviral therapy HAART; b) willingness of both partners to provide written informed consent including consent to continued couple counselling for 3 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HIV-1 subtyping was carried out by heteroduplex mobility analysis (HMA) by amplifying env region; and DNA sequencing by amplifying gag region. RESULTS: HIV-1 env gene was amplified successfully in 10/30 samples; gag gene, in 25/30 samples; and both env and gag gene were amplified successfully in 5/30 samples. HIV-1 subtype C was detected from 21 samples; subtype B, from 7; and subtype A, from 2. Sample from 1 positive partner was detected as subtype C by env HMA and subtype B by gag sequencing. CONCLUSION: HIV-1 subtype C was found to be the predominant subtype of HIV-1 in serodiscordant couples attending our ICTC, followed by HIV-1 subtype B and HIV-1 subtype A, respectively. DNA sequencing was found to be the most reliable method for determining the subtypes of HIV-1.


Subject(s)
Family Characteristics , HIV Infections/virology , HIV Seronegativity , HIV-1/classification , HIV-1/genetics , Heteroduplex Analysis/methods , Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods , AIDS Serodiagnosis , Counseling , DNA, Viral/analysis , DNA, Viral/genetics , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Female , Genes, env , Genes, gag , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV-1/immunology , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital , Prevalence
4.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg ; 98(4): 205-17, 2004 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15049459

ABSTRACT

Filariasis control programmes are moving towards a strategy of repeated single-dose mass treatment of endemic populations. Using a combination, such as albendazole (ALB) to diethylcarbamazine (DEC) gives both macrofilaricidal and anti-helmintic activity. However, the safety of the combination versus DEC alone should be established in field studies in large populations prior to incorporation into national programmes. The present study compared the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of single doses of DEC 6 mg/kg + ALB placebo with DEC 6 mg/kg + ALB 400 mg in populations living in two filariasis endemic villages in the district of Wardha in western India. The study was double blind, parallel group, and randomized. Safety and tolerability study were studied in males and females older than 5 years. Safety was assessed by monitoring if adverse events (AEs) over 5 days affected daily acivities. Subjects in the 2 treatment groups experienced insignificantly different effects on daily activities and the combination was shown to be safe. Efficacy was evaluated by microfilaraemia (Mf), immunochromatographic test (ICT) and ultrasonography (USG) at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months of follow up. The efficacy study enrolled 103 male patients (aged 18-50 years) in microfilariae positive, clinical disease and asymptomatic, amicrofilaremic groups. There was no significant difference in efficacy between groups at 12 months. Within the Mf positive group, significant differences were seen in microfilaraemia (P < 0.001) with both treatments, and in USG (P < 0.001 and P < 0.004 respectively), at 12 months. The present field study has shown the combination of DEC + ALB to be as safe as the single drug DEC and thus the combination can be put in use in the national filariasis control programmes. Both drugs were adequately absorbed. The study at present does not provide evidence for the greater efficacy of the combination at 12 months follow up. While the safety of the combination has been ascertained, the incorporation or otherwise of ALB into national programmes for greater efficacy must await results of studies with longer follow up.


Subject(s)
Albendazole/administration & dosage , Diethylcarbamazine/administration & dosage , Elephantiasis, Filarial/drug therapy , Endemic Diseases , Filaricides/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Albendazole/adverse effects , Albendazole/blood , Child , Child, Preschool , Diethylcarbamazine/adverse effects , Diethylcarbamazine/blood , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Elephantiasis, Filarial/blood , Elephantiasis, Filarial/epidemiology , Female , Filaricides/adverse effects , Filaricides/blood , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
5.
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...