Evaluation of agreement between physicians' notation of 'no evidence of disease' (NED) and patients' report of cancer status.

This study examines extent of agreement between oncologists' and cancer patients' reports of current cancer status. Participants with history of cancer were given a comprehensive geriatric assessment in which they were asked whether they had cancer at the present time. This was compared to cancer status concurrently recorded by their physicians in the chart. 75.5% of patients whose physicians reported 'no evidence of disease' (NED) reported that they currently had cancer. 30% of them were anxious and 27% were depressed. Among patients for whom both the patient and physician reported no cancer, only 12.5% were anxious and 7% depressed. Compared to patients with concordant responses, those who discrepantly reported they had cancer had significantly more comorbid illnesses, medications, and pain, and lower levels of social, emotional, and physical functioning. Moreover, equal levels of distress and dysfunction were found between those who reported cancer but had NED and those who reported cancer and did have active disease by physician notation. Although conclusions about cause and effect are limited due to study design, findings suggest that some patients might suffer unnecessarily from lack of understanding about current disease status. These findings also suggest the need for improved physician-patient communication and symptom recognition/management.

The association between oral health and general health and quality of life in older male cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the long-term effects of oral health problems on quality of life (QoL), functional status, pain, and general health in older male cancer patients. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective observational study. SETTING: Community dwelling cancer patients served by a Department of Veterans Affairs hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty male cancer patients responded to the question "Do you have tooth or mouth problems making it hard to eat?" The relationship between patients answering "yes" and the following parameters was assessed: demographics, comorbid conditions, habits, activities of daily living, pain, anxiety, depression, social support, spirituality, QoL, and overall health ratings. MEASUREMENTS: Chi-square contingency tables for dichotomous variables, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel for ordered categorical variables, and t tests for associations with continuous variables. RESULTS: The median age of respondents was 67. Those reporting tooth or mouth problems had had their cancer diagnosed on average 2.9 years before, and 83.3% were found clinically to be cancer free. Patients with these problems had significantly lower global (P=.003) and subscale scores on QoL analysis and higher levels of anxiety (P<.001) and depression (P=.01) than those without tooth or mouth problems; they also had significantly more pain (P<.001) and lower physical functioning (P<.001) and were more impaired in activities of daily living (P<.001). Those with tooth or mouth problems were more likely to describe their overall health as fair or poor (P=.01). Having cancer located in the head and neck region related significantly to having mouth or tooth problems (P=.005), but these problems were not associated with race, education, income, insurance coverage, age, comorbid conditions, alcohol consumption, tobacco or medication usage, type of cancer treatment, tumor stage at diagnosis or follow-up, perceived social support, or spirituality. CONCLUSION: Older male cancer patients with mouth or tooth problems making it hard to eat are more likely to have a lower QoL, poorer emotional health, lower levels of physical functioning, and greater pain than patients without these problems.

Gastrointestinal toxicity of transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To characterize the severity and time course of rectal toxicity following transperineal prostate brachytherapy using prospectively recorded data, and to determine factors associated with toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred thirty-four patients with prostate cancer treated with transperineal brachytherapy from 1997 to 1999 had rectal toxicity data available for analysis. Patients with Gleason score (GS) > 6, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 6, or stage > T2a were treated initially with external beam radiation therapy followed by brachytherapy boost; patients with none of these features were treated with brachytherapy alone. Both iodine-125 and palladium-103 sources were used, and loaded according to a modified Quimby distribution. At each follow-up, toxicity was recorded according to a modified RTOG gastrointestinal scale. RESULTS: Thirty-nine percent of patients experienced gastrointestinal toxicity, mostly Grade 1. Median duration of symptoms was 6 months. Two patients experienced Grade 3 toxicity, both of whom had minimal symptoms until their 12-month follow-up. There was no Grade 4 or 5 toxicity. The addition of external beam radiation therapy (p = 0.003), higher clinical stage (p = 0.006), and Caucasian race (p = 0.01) were associated with increased incidence of toxicity. CONCLUSION: Most patients with rectal toxicity have very mild symptoms. There is a small risk of severe late toxicity. External beam radiation, higher stage, and race are associated with toxicity.

Comprehensive assessment of the elderly cancer patient: the feasibility of self-report methodology.

PURPOSE: Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) has aided the medical community greatly in understanding the quality-of-life issues and functional needs of older patients. With its professional team assessment approach, however, CGA may be time consuming and costly. The goal of the present study was to assess the ability of cancer patients to complete a self-administered CGA and then to characterize cancer patients across multiple domains and age groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred sixty-six male outpatient oncology patients at the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center were asked to fill out a survey assessing 10 domains (demographics, comorbid conditions, activities of daily living, functional status, pain, financial well being, social support, emotional state, spiritual well-being, and quality of life). RESULTS: Seventy-six percent of the patients who received their surveys and kept their appointments returned the assessment tool. Older oncology patients had significantly less education (P <.0001), income (P =.05), frequent exercise (P =.01), and chance of being disease free (P =.003) than younger patients. Other findings in older patients were a higher rate of marriage (P =.02), more difficulty in taking medications (P =.05), and less cigarette (P =.03) and alcohol (P =.03) use. Members of all age cohorts reported a sense of social support, with younger patients deriving this more from family and friends than older patients, and older patients deriving social support more from membership in religious communities than younger patients. No differences were found across age groups for number and impact of comorbid illnesses, number of medications, basic and instrumental activities of daily living, pain, overall health rating, financial adequacy, anxiety, depression, and quality of life. CONCLUSION: CGA can be conducted in an outpatient cancer community using a self-report format. Despite the fact that this population varied demographically across age groups and is limited to veterans, this study demonstrated remarkable similarities between younger and older cancer patients in terms of functional status, health states, and quality of life.