Outcomes of subchorionic hematoma-affected pregnancies in the infertile population.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the implications of an incidentally noted subchorionic hematoma on pregnancy outcomes in the infertile population. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care, university-based facility. All patients with intrauterine pregnancy on initial obstetric ultrasound presenting to an infertility clinic between January 2015 and March 2018 (n = 1210), regardless of treatment cycle, were included. Nonviable pregnancies were excluded. The main outcome measured was association between subchorionic hematoma and first trimester miscarriage. RESULTS: The prevalence of subchorionic hematoma was 12.5% (n = 151) and did not differ by type of fertility treatment. There was no association between subchorionic hematoma and first trimester miscarriage; however, among patients with subchorionic hematoma, those who reported both bleeding and cramping had an increased probability of miscarriage compared to those without symptoms (0.62 vs. 0.12, P <0.001). The live birth rate in this sample was 81.3% and there were no statistically significant differences in pregnancy outcomes between those with and without subchorionic hematoma. CONCLUSION: Among an infertile population, there was no increased risk of miscarriage when subchorionic hematoma was seen on early ultrasound; however, when patients noted both vaginal bleeding and cramping, their probability of miscarriage was significantly increased.

Patient Preferences for Receiving Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy.

Purpose: To characterize patient preferences regarding gender-affirming hormone therapy (HT) providers and telemedicine use. Methods: Between May and October 2019, a survey was administered to adult patients attending a tertiary medical center's HT clinic. The survey included questions on demographics, barriers to care, and preferences for HT follow-up care. Interest in telemedicine was measured using a Likert scale. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify patient factors associated with interest in telemedicine. Results: Among 111 patients, 63.1% (n=70) preferred an in-person visit with a specialist and 21.6% (n=24) preferred a video visit with their specialist. While only 15.3% (n=17) preferred follow-up with a primary care provider (PCP), 71.0% (n=80) felt comfortable transitioning future care to a PCP. Notably, 52.3% (n=58) of patients were interested in a telemedicine visit. Factors associated with interest in telemedicine included identifying as a transgender man (aOR 3.94, 95% CI [1.24-12.53], p=0.02), minority race/ethnicity (aOR 6.71, 95% CI [1.79-25.17], p=0.005), no need to travel (aOR 3.34, 95% CI [1.14-9.85], p=0.03), no concerns about video visits (aOR 14.66, 95% CI [4.34-49.56], p<0.0001), and concern about their PCP offering a broad range of gender services (aOR 8.63, 95% CI [2.41-29.67], p=0.0006). Conclusions: Patients presenting for HT follow-up prefer continued care with a specialist. However, patients were willing to transition care to PCPs and were interested in telemedicine before the COVID-19 pandemic.