Long-term Engagement in Physical Activity Among Bariatric Surgery Patients: Associations with Treatment Outcomes at 5-Year Follow-up.

PURPOSE: Physical activity studies involving bariatric surgery patients tend to be short-term or cross-sectional investigations. Longer-term studies are limited and typically consist of relatively brief objective measurement periods used to generalize activity patterns. Very little research combines objective measurements with structured interviews to determine both the patterns and related factors of long-term physical activity among patients undergoing bariatric surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Previous volunteers in a perioperative physical activity study were invited to participate in a mixed methods study investigating physical activity among bariatric patients over a 5-year postoperative period. Fifty-one patients (Mage = 45.4 years; 76.5% female, 90.2% White; 86.3% Roux-en-Y procedure) provided interview, survey, accelerometer, and anthropometric data. RESULTS: Participants were divided into four exercise quartiles, based on self-report of their length of regular exercise involvement from 1 year before through 5 years after surgery. Those reporting the most periods of regular exercise took the most measured steps per day, had greater moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and more bout-related activity, experienced the largest decrease in BMI, and reported the most adherence to nutritional guidelines. Participants reporting the most and least physical activity found the measurement periods to be most similar to their normal activity patterns. While physical activity increased significantly after surgery, measured physical activity did not reach recommended levels for steps or exercise bout minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Measured physical activity and self-reported physical activity show congruent trends among patients undergoing bariatric surgery. More research is needed to determine optimal long-term monitoring and promotion of physical activity among patients.

Revision Gastrojejunostomy Versus Suturing With and Without Omental Patch for Perforated Marginal Ulcer Treatment After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

BACKGROUND: Ulceration at the gastrojejunostomy is a late bariatric surgery complication in 0.6-16% of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients. As there is no general consensus on management of acute ulcer perforations, we compare two methods of surgical repair: the most commonly performed procedure, suturing of ulcer with or without omental patch versus revision gastrojejunostomy (RG). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of cases at a single large, Midwestern US high-volume bariatric center from November 2, 2006 through March 11, 2021 identified 144 RYGB patients undergoing surgical repair for a perforated ulcer: 72 treated by SGP and 72 by RG. Outcomes, including length of stay, leaks, readmissions, and reoperations, were compared. Categorical variables were compared by Chi-square tests and continuous variables by ANOVA. RESULTS: Patients were primarily female (77.1%) and Caucasian (97.2%), 49.7 ± 12.5 years old, and 90.6 ± 26.6 kg. Most had laparoscopic RYGBs (98.6%). There were no demographic differences between groups. Of the RG patients, 11.4% experienced ulcer recurrence versus 41.7% of SGP patients (p < .001), and 2.8% of RG versus 11.1% of SGP patients required a reversal (p < .05). No significant differences between groups occurred in time to perforation (3.2 vs. 2.5 years for RG and SGP groups, respectively), length of stay (5.0 vs. 6.8 days), leaks (1.4% vs. 2.8%), readmissions (4.2% vs. 4.2%), or reoperations (2.8% vs 5.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients developing perforated marginal ulcers after RYGB can be safely and effectively treated by revision gastrojejunostomy with a lower likelihood of ulcer recurrence. Short-term morbidity was comparable to suturing with or without an omental patch.

Safety and Efficacy of Bariatric Surgery in Cirrhosis Patients With Extreme Obesity.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery in patients with cirrhosis. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Bariatric surgery may be a viable option for patients with cirrhosis and extreme obesity. However, the risk of liver decompensation after surgery is not thoroughly investigated. METHODS: We conducted a case-controlled study with 106 obese patients with cirrhosis (cases) and 317 age, sex, body mass index-, and type of surgery-matched obese patients without cirrhosis (controls) who underwent bariatric surgery. RESULTS: Patients with cirrhosis were predominantly Child-Pugh class A (97%) with the diagnosis established prior to surgery in only 46%. In the cirrhosis group, there was no death in the first 30 days compared with 1 patient in the control group. At 90 days there was 1 death in the cirrhosis group but no additional deaths in the control group. In total, 12 months after the surgery, there were 3 deaths in the cirrhosis group and 1 in the control group (2.8% vs 0.6%, P = 0.056). The surgery-related length of stay was significantly longer in patients with cirrhosis (3.7 ±â€Š4.0 vs 2.6 ±â€Š2.4 d, P = 0.001), but the 30-day readmission rate was lower (7.5% vs 11.9%, P = 0.001). The percent of total weight loss at 30 and 90-days was not significantly different between the groups and remained that way even at 1 year (29.1 ±â€Š10.9 vs 31.2 ±â€Š9.4%, P = 0.096). CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery in obese cirrhotic patients is not associated with excessive mortality compared with noncirrhotic obese patients.