Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 51(6): 818-828, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28944985

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the sonographic features of endometrial cancer in relation to tumor stage, grade and histological type, using the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) terminology. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter study of 1714 women with biopsy-confirmed endometrial cancer undergoing standardized transvaginal grayscale and Doppler ultrasound examination according to the IETA study protocol, by experienced ultrasound examiners using high-end ultrasound equipment. Clinical and sonographic data were entered into a web-based database. We assessed how strongly sonographic characteristics, according to IETA, were associated with outcome at hysterectomy, i.e. tumor stage, grade and histological type, using univariable logistic regression and the c-statistic. RESULTS: In total, 1538 women were included in the final analysis. Median age was 65 (range, 27-98) years, median body mass index was 28.4 (range 16-67) kg/m2 , 1377 (89.5%) women were postmenopausal and 1296 (84.3%) reported abnormal vaginal bleeding. Grayscale and color Doppler features varied according to grade and stage of tumor. High-risk tumors, compared with low-risk tumors, were less likely to have regular endometrial-myometrial junction (difference of -23%; 95% CI, -27 to -18%), were larger (mean endometrial thickness; difference of +9%; 95% CI, +8 to +11%), and were more likely to have non-uniform echogenicity (difference of +7%; 95% CI, +1 to +13%), a multiple, multifocal vessel pattern (difference of +21%; 95% CI, +16 to +26%) and a moderate or high color score (difference of +22%; 95% CI, +18 to +27%). CONCLUSION: Grayscale and color Doppler sonographic features are associated with grade and stage of tumor, and differ between high- and low-risk endometrial cancer. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.


Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasm Grading , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Consensus Development Conferences as Topic , Cross-Sectional Studies , Endometrial Neoplasms/classification , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Terminology as Topic
2.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 51(2): 259-268, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28715144

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate intra- and interrater agreement and reliability with regard to describing ultrasound images of the endometrium using the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) terminology. METHODS: Four expert and four non-expert raters assessed videoclips of transvaginal ultrasound examinations of the endometrium obtained from 99 women with postmenopausal bleeding and sonographic endometrial thickness ≥ 4.5 mm but without fluid in the uterine cavity. The following features were rated: endometrial echogenicity, endometrial midline, bright edge, endometrial-myometrial junction, color score, vascular pattern, irregularly branching vessels and color splashes. The color content of the endometrial scan was estimated using a visual analog scale graded from 0 to 100. To estimate intrarater agreement and reliability, the same videoclips were assessed twice with a minimum of 2 months' interval. The raters were blinded to their own results and to those of the other raters. RESULTS: Interrater differences in the described prevalence of most IETA variables were substantial, and some variable categories were observed rarely. Specific agreement was poor for variables with many categories. For binary variables, specific agreement was better for absence than for presence of a category. For variables with more than two outcome categories, specific agreement for expert and non-expert raters was best for not-defined endometrial midline (93% and 96%), regular endometrial-myometrial junction (72% and 70%) and three-layer endometrial pattern (67% and 56%). The grayscale ultrasound variable with the best reliability was uniform vs non-uniform echogenicity (multirater kappa (κ), 0.55 for expert and 0.52 for non-expert raters), and the variables with the lowest reliability were appearance of the endometrial-myometrial junction (κ, 0.25 and 0.16) and the nine-category endometrial echogenicity variable (κ, 0.29 and 0.28). The most reliable color Doppler variable was color score (mean weighted κ, 0.77 and 0.69). Intra- and interrater agreement and reliability were similar for experts and non-experts. CONCLUSIONS: Inter- and intrarater agreement and reliability when using IETA terminology were limited. This may have implications when assessing the association between a particular ultrasound feature and a specific histological diagnosis, because lack of reproducibility reduces the reliability of the association between a feature and the outcome. Future studies should investigate whether using fewer categories of variable or offering practical training could improve agreement and reliability. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.


Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Endometrium/diagnostic imaging , Postmenopause , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color , Uterine Hemorrhage/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Consensus , Endometrial Neoplasms/classification , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Endometrium/pathology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Terminology as Topic , Uterine Hemorrhage/etiology , Uterine Hemorrhage/pathology
3.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 48(3): 318-32, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27349699

ABSTRACT

The IDEA (International Deep Endometriosis Analysis group) statement is a consensus opinion on terms, definitions and measurements that may be used to describe the sonographic features of the different phenotypes of endometriosis. Currently, it is difficult to compare results between published studies because authors use different terms when describing the same structures and anatomical locations. We hope that the terms and definitions suggested herein will be adopted in centers around the world. This would result in consistent use of nomenclature when describing the ultrasound location and extent of endometriosis. We believe that the standardization of terminology will allow meaningful comparisons between future studies in women with an ultrasound diagnosis of endometriosis and should facilitate multicenter research. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.


Subject(s)
Consensus , Endometriosis/diagnostic imaging , Peritoneal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography , Endometriosis/pathology , Female , Humans , Pelvis/pathology , Peritoneal Diseases/pathology , Practice Guidelines as Topic
5.
Facts Views Vis Obgyn ; 7(1): 60-3, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25897372

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to find the best 3D reconstruction technique to visualize the endometrial-myometrial junction (EMJ). METHODS: Retrospective observational study on 240 stored 3D volumes of 80 patients. The first author reconstructed the 2D midcoronal image without volume contrast imaging (VCI), with VCI set at 4 mm and with VCI set at 2 mm. Three images per patient (240 images) were saved and integrated in the web-based electronic data capture software Clinical Data Miner (CDM) (http://cdm.esat.kuleuven.be). Five experienced gynaecologists analysed the images shown in random order. They scored the image quality (good, moderate, poor, insufficient) and described the EMJ of these images using IETA terminology (regular, irregular, interrupted, not defined). One of the examiners (CVP) also re-evaluated the same set of images after 12 days to assess intra-observer variability. RESULTS: The use of VCI significantly improved the recorded subjective image quality. The Fleiss' kappa coefficient for evaluating the inter-observer variability of the EMJ description using coronal view without VCI, with VCI at 4 mm and VCI at 2 mm were 0.36 ± 0.05, 0.34 ± 0.05 and 0.42 ± 0.05, respectively. The corresponding figures for the intra-observer variability were 0.58 ± 0.08, 0.36 ± 0.08 and 0.68 ± 0.07, respectively. DISCUSSION: In this study on 3D reconstructed coronal images of the uterine cavity, the 2 mm VCI slices gave the best quality images of the EMJ.

6.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 46(3): 284-98, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25652685

ABSTRACT

The MUSA (Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment) statement is a consensus statement on terms, definitions and measurements that may be used to describe and report the sonographic features of the myometrium using gray-scale sonography, color/power Doppler and three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. The terms and definitions described may form the basis for prospective studies to predict the risk of different myometrial pathologies, based on their ultrasound appearance, and thus should be relevant for the clinician in daily practice and for clinical research. The sonographic features and use of terminology for describing the two most common myometrial lesions (fibroids and adenomyosis) and uterine smooth muscle tumors are presented.


Subject(s)
Adenomyosis/diagnostic imaging , Leiomyoma/diagnostic imaging , Myometrium/diagnostic imaging , Terminology as Topic , Uterine Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Ultrasonography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...