Diagnosis of rare entity CD138 negative plasma cell multiple myeloma: the synergy between laboratory and clinician makes the difference.

Plasma cell multiple myeloma (MM) is a multiform clinical entity characterized by different laboratory hallmarks. This case shows a rare entity of plasma cell myeloma: the entire plasma cell population lack the CD138 expression. In this case, a careful analysis of laboratory finding, particular flow cytometry gating strategies and the use of other ancillary laboratory tests, guide the clinicians to correct diagnosis. The correct evaluation of pre-analytical phase and the correct gating strategy are the necessary conditions to produce robust and solid flow cytometric results. The diagnostic implications of CD138-negative plasma cell are strictly linked to stem cell-like clonogenic features, such as possible more aggressive clinical behaviour and increasing probability of chemotherapy resistance. At this time, clinical laboratory remains the main reference point to MM diagnosis.

Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Rituximab in Previously Untreated Patients with CD20+ Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma or Follicular Lymphoma: Results from an Italian Phase IIIb Study.

Subcutaneous (SC) rituximab may be beneficial in terms of convenience and tolerability, with potentially fewer and less severe administration-related reactions (ARRs) compared to the intravenous (IV) form. This report presents the results of a phase IIIb study conducted in Italy. The study included adult patients with CD20+ DLBCL or FL having received at least one full dose of IV RTX 375 mg/m2 during induction or maintenance. Patients on induction received ≥4 cycles of RTX SC 1400 mg plus standard chemotherapy and FL patients on maintenance received ≥6 cycles of RTX SC. Overall, 159 patients (73 DLBCL, 86 FL) were enrolled: 103 (54 DLBCL, 49 FL) completed induction and 42 patients with FL completed 12 maintenance cycles. ARRs were reported in 10 patients (6.3%), 3 (4.2%) with DLBCL and 7 (8.1%) with FL, all of mild severity, and resolved without dose delay/discontinuation. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events occurred in 41 (25.9%) and 14 patients (8.9%), respectively. Two patients with DLBCL had fatal events: Klebsiella infection (related to rituximab) and septic shock (related to chemotherapy). Neutropenia (14 patients, 8.9%) was the most common treatment-related TEAE. Two patients with DLBCL (2.8%) and 6 with FL (7.0%) discontinued rituximab due to TEAEs. 65.2% and 69.7% of patients with DLBCL and 67.9% and 73.6% of patients with FL had complete response (CR) and CR unconfirmed, respectively. The median time to events (EFS, PFS, and OS) was not estimable due to the low rate of events. At a median follow-up of 29.5 and 47.8 months in patients with DLBCL and FL, respectively, EFS, PFS, and OS were 70.8%, 70.8%, and 80.6% in patients with DLBCL and 77.9%, 77.9%, and 95.3% in patients with FL, respectively. The switch from IV to SC rituximab in patients with DLBCL and FL was associated with low risk of ARRs and satisfactory response in both groups. This trial was registered with NCT01987505.

[Cardiovascular complications of chemotherapy]. / Complicanze cardiovascolari della terapia antineoplastica.

In the last decades, oncological therapy has changed the natural history of many types of cancer, which can now be considered curable or as chronic or slowly progressive diseases. It is well known that chemotherapy and radiotherapy may induce cardiotoxicity. Anthracyclines are among the most active antineoplastic agents, and their cardiac effects have been known for a long time. In addition, there is an emerging role for potential cardiovascular effects of other chemotherapy drugs such as taxanes, antimetabolites (capecitabine) as well as targeted agents (monoclonal antibody trastuzumab and bevacizumab and the tyrosin-kinase inhibitor sunitinib). Patient treated with chemotherapy are at higher risk of cardiovascular events than the general population, so that having undergone chemotherapy may be considered as a novel cardiovascular risk factor. This review briefly summarizes the most important cardiovascular toxicities caused by antineoplastic pharmacological treatment and how cardiologists, oncologists and general practitioners should approach cancer patients while on treatment or during follow-up to prevent or manage cardiovascular events.

ABL1 amplification in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

ABL1 amplification, due to a cryptic episomal translocation NUP214/ABL1, is a novel finding in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Here we report on the incidence and clinical features of this genetic defect in a series of 30 consecutive adult T-cell ALL patients. Multiple copies of the ABL1 gene were detected in two patients (6.6%), one with the karyotype 46,XY,t(1;3)(p36;p21),del(6)(q23)/46,XY and the other without analyzable metaphases. Metaphase/interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) detected multiple uncountable signals corresponding to ABL1 in mitotic cells and nuclei from both patients. In one patient, no signals corresponded with the 9p21 chromosomal region, which contains the p16INK4a gene, and in the other one signal was observed. Quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) demonstrated that in these patients ABL1 gene expression was 14- and 18-fold greater than in normal controls, and returned to normal levels only when complete remission was achieved. We reached the following conclusions: (1) FISH is the only technique that promptly identifies T-cell ALL patients with ABL1 amplification, (2) quick identification with FISH is fundamental in the clinic because this T-cell ALL subset is imatinib sensitive but may become resistant due to development of additional mutations, and (3) ABL1 quantitative RT-PCR may be easily applied to monitor minimal residual disease.