Joinpoint regression analysis of recent trends in desmoplastic malignant melanoma incidence and mortality: 15-year multicentre retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Recent data reveal a marked rise in the detection and mortality rates of Desmoplastic Malignant Melanoma (DMM). This trend underscores the imperative for an in-depth analysis of DMM's epidemiology, which is crucial for the formulation of precise medical and public health strategies. This investigation seeks to elucidate the variations in the incidence and mortality of DMM over a 15-year period (2005-2019). METHODS: Data on DMM patients was sourced from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Both incidence and incidence-based mortality rates (IBM) were directly extracted from the SEER database. Joinpoint regression was used to analyze and calculate the average annual percent change (AAPC) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2019, 3,384 DMM cases were identified, boasting an age-adjusted incidence rate of 36.3 cases per 1000,000 person-years (95% CI 3.51-3.76) and an IBM of 1.65cases per 1000,000 person-years (95% CI 1.57-1.74). Of these, 2,353 were males (69.53%) and 1,031 were females (30.47%). There were 1894 patients (55.97%) who were over 70 years old. Predominantly, DMM lesions manifested in exposed areas: Limbs (955, 28.22%), Face (906, 26.77%), and Scalp and Neck (865, 25.56%). The incidence of DMM increased significantly at a rate of APC = 0.9% during 2005-2019, while the incidence-based mortality showed a significant upward trend (APC = 7%) during 2005-2012, and slowly increasing trend (APC = 0.6%) during 2012-2019. In contrast to the modest upward trajectory in female incidence and mortality, male incidence initially surged, later declining, while male mortality peaked and stabilized post-2012. The primary sites for incidence and mortality were chronically sun-exposed areas: Face, Scalp and Neck, and Limbs. CONCLUSIONS: In recent years, the incidence and incidence-based mortality of DMM have significantly increased. Each subgroup analysis has different trends, and these trends can provide better support for our exploration of DMM.

Crafting a prognostic nomogram for the overall survival rate of cutaneous verrucous carcinoma using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.

Background: The aim of this study was to establish and verify a predictive nomogram for patients with cutaneous verrucous carcinoma (CVC) who will eventually survive and to determine the accuracy of the nomogram relative to the conventional American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. Methods: Assessments were performed on 1125 patients with CVC between 2004 and 2015, and the results of those examinations were recorded in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were randomly divided at a ratio of 7:3 into the training (n = 787) and validation (n = 338) cohorts. Predictors were identified using stepwise regression analysis in the COX regression model for create a nomogram to predict overall survival of CVC patients at 3-, 5-, and 8-years post-diagnosis. We compared the performance of our model with that of the AJCC prognosis model using several evaluation metrics, including C-index, NRI, IDI, AUC, calibration plots, and DCAs. Results: Multivariate risk factors including sex, age at diagnosis, marital status, AJCC stage, radiation status, and surgery status were employed to determine the overall survival (OS) rate (P<0.05). The C-index nomogram performed better than the AJCC staging system variable for both the training (0.737 versus 0.582) and validation cohorts (0.735 versus 0.573), which AUC (> 0.7) revealed that the nomogram exhibited significant discriminative ability. The statistically significant NRI and IDI values at 3-, 5-, and 8-year predictions for overall survival (OS) in the validation cohort (55.72%, 63.71%, and 78.23%, respectively and 13.65%, 20.52%, and 23.73%, respectively) demonstrate that the established nomogram outperforms the AJCC staging system (P < 0.01) in predicting OS for patients with cutaneous verrucous carcinoma (CVC). The calibration plots indicate good performance of the nomogram, while decision curve analyses (DCAs) show that the predictive model could have a favorable clinical impact. Conclusion: This study constructed and validated a nomogram for predicting the prognosis of patients with CVC in the SEER database and assessed it using several variables. This nomogram model can assist clinical staff in making more-accurate predictions than the AJCC staging method about the 3-, 5-, and 8-year OS probabilities of patients with CVC.

A nomogram for predicting survival in patients with skin non-keratinizing large cell squamous cell carcinoma: A study based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

Introduction: This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with non-keratinized large cell squamous cell carcinoma (NKLCSCC) at 3, 5, and 8 years after diagnosis. Methods: Data on SCC patients were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Training (70%) and validation (30%) cohorts were generated using random selection of patients. Independent prognostic factors were selected using the backward stepwise Cox regression model. To predict the CSS rates in patients with NKLCSCC at 3, 5, and 8 years after diagnosis, all of the factors were incorporated into the nomogram. Indicators such as the concordance index (C-index), area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), net reclassification index (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), calibration curve, and decision-curve analysis (DCA) were then used to validate the performance of the nomogram. Results: This study included 9,811 patients with NKLCSCC. Twelve prognostic factors were identified by Cox regression analysis in the training cohort, which were age, number of regional nodes examined, number of positive regional nodes, sex, race, marital status, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, surgery status, chemotherapy status, radiotherapy status, summary stage, and income. The constructed nomogram was validated both internally and externally. The nomogram had good discrimination ability, as indicated by the comparatively high C-indices and AUC values. The nomogram was properly calibrated, as indicated by the calibration curves. Our nomogram was superior to the AJCC model, as illustrated by its superior NRI and IDI values. DCA curves indicated the clinical usability of the nomogram. Conclusion: The first nomogram for prognosis predictions of patients with NKLCSCC has been developed and verified. Its performance and usability demonstrated that the nomogram could be utilized in clinical settings. However, additional external verification is still required.