Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Orthod ; 31(3): 243-7; discussion 202-3, 2004 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15489368

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of three curing lights of different types. DESIGN: Prospective randomized laboratory investigations. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Adhesive pre-coated orthodontic brackets were bonded to 9 groups of extracted premolars and the adhesive was cured using three different curing lights, each at three different times. Bond strength was tested using a shear/peel method. RESULTS: The plasma light had 3 times the light intensity of the standard quartz halogen light. The curing times recommended by the manufacturers were 2 seconds for the plasma light, 10 seconds for the high intensity quartz halogen light and 20 seconds for the standard one. Mean debond stresses with these cure times were 9.36, 11.77 and 12.00 MPa, respectively, p<0.04. Increasing the plasma light cure to 4 seconds increased the mean debond stress to 11.19 MPa, similar to that for the other lights, p=0.62. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a plasma light confers worthwhile time savings when bonding orthodontic brackets, whilst producing bonds of equivalent strength to those found with quartz halogen lights.


Subject(s)
Adhesives/chemistry , Coated Materials, Biocompatible/chemistry , Dental Bonding/instrumentation , Lighting/instrumentation , Orthodontic Appliance Design , Orthodontic Brackets , Analysis of Variance , Dental Debonding , Equipment Design , Humans , Materials Testing , Prospective Studies , Radiometry/instrumentation , Shear Strength , Stress, Mechanical , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...