ABSTRACT
Background: The financial cost of hypertension could result in serious economic hardship for patients, their households, and the community. To assess and compare the direct and indirect cost of care for hypertension in urban and rural tertiary health facilities. Material and Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was carried out in two tertiary health facilities which are located in urban and rural communities of the southwest, Nigeria. Four hundred and six (204 urban, 202 rural) hypertensive patients were selected from the health facilities using a systematic sampling technique. A pretested semi-structured, interviewer-administered questionnaire adapted from that used in a previous study was used for data collection. Information on biodata, and direct and indirect costs was collected. Data entry and analysis were done using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Results: More than half of the respondents were females (urban, 54.4%; rural, 53.5%) and in their middle age (45-64 years) (urban, 50.5%; rural, 51.0%). The monthly cost of care for hypertension was significantly higher in urban than in rural tertiary health facilities (urban, 19,703.26 [$54.73]; rural, 18,448.58 [$51.25]) (P < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the direct cost (urban, 15,835.54 [$43.99]; rural, 14,531.68 [$40.37]) (P < 0.001), although the indirect cost (urban, 3,867.72 [$10.74]; rural, 3,916.91 [$10.88]) (P = 0.540) did not show much difference between the groups. The cost of drugs/consumables and investigations contributed more than half (urban, 56.8%; rural, 58.8%) of the cost in both health facilities. Conclusion: The financial cost of hypertension was higher in the urban tertiary health facility; therefore, more government support is needed in this health facility to close the financial gap.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: the cost of illness (COI) of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) has detrimental effects on healthcare outcomes in addition to the serious economic impact on patients and their families. This study estimated and compared the COI of NCDs and its predictors in private and public health facilities (HF) in Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria. Methods: the study was carried out in selected HF (39 private; 11 public) using a comparative cross-sectional design with a mixed method of data collection. Quantitative data were collected from 348 hypertensive and/or diabetic patients (173 private; 175 public) using a semi-structured, interviewer-administered questionnaire while qualitative data were from 5 key informant interviews (KII) conducted with HF heads or their representatives. Results: the average monthly COI of NCDs was higher among patients in private (â¦15,750.38±14,286.47 [US$43.75±39.68]) than in public HF (â¦13,283.37±16,432.68 [US$ 36.90±45.65]) (P<0.001), however, the indirect cost was higher in public HF (private, â¦1,561.07 [US$4.34]; public, â¦3,739.26 [US$10.39]) (p<0.001). Predictors of COI of NCDs identified were income and admission in both groups. Additionally, age, payment method, type of NCDs, having two or more complications, and exercise were identified in private while socioeconomic status, length of diagnosis, and alcohol were identified in public HF. The KII revealed a long waiting time for the public HF patients which accounted for the huge indirect cost. Conclusion: the study found a huge indirect cost in the public HF that could be minimized by developing policies that would reduce the waiting time of patients. Government and private interventions targeting identified predictors should be applied to reduce the financial burden of NCD.
