Neurosurgical Malpractice Litigation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Neurosurgery has 1 of the highest risks for medical malpractice claims. We reviewed the factors associated with neurosurgical malpractice claims and litigation in the United States and reported the outcomes through a systematic review of the literature. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines using the Medline, Embase, Cochrane, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases. We sought to identify pertinent studies containing information about medical malpractice claims and outcomes involving neurosurgeons in the United States. RESULTS: We identified 15 retrospective studies spanning from 2002 to 2023 that reviewed over 7890 malpractice claims involving practicing neurosurgeons in the United States. Disparities were evident in neurosurgical litigation, with 474 cases linked to brain-related surgeries and a larger proportion, 1926 cases, tied to spine surgeries. The most commonly filed claims were intraprocedural errors (37.4%), delayed diagnoses (32.1%), and failure to treat (28.8%). Less frequently filed claims included misdiagnosis or choice of incorrect procedure (18.4%), occurrence of death (17.3%), test misinterpretation (14.4%), failure to appropriately refer patients for evaluation/treatment (14.3%), unnecessary surgical procedures (13.3%), and lack of informed consent (8.3%). The defendant was favored in 44.3% of claims, while in 31.3% of lawsuits were dropped, 17.7% of verdicts favored the plaintiff, and 16.6% reached an out of court settlement. Only 3.5% of lawsuits found both parties liable. CONCLUSION: Neurosurgery is a high-risk specialty with 1 of the highest rates of malpractice claims. Spine claims had a significantly higher rate of filed malpractice claims, while cranial malpractice claims were associated with higher litigation compensation. Predictably, spinal cord injuries play a crucial role in predicting litigation. Importantly, nonsurgical treatments are also a common source of liability in neurosurgical practice.

Cardioprotective Effects of Nanoparticles in Cardiovascular Diseases: A State-of-the-Art Review.

It has been reported that death related to cardiovascular disease has increased up to 12.5% just in the past decade alone with various factors playing a role. In 2015 alone, it has been estimated that there were 422.7 million cases of CVD with 17.9 million deaths. Various therapies have been discovered to control and treat CVDs and their complications including reperfusion therapies and pharmacological approaches but many patients still progress to heart failure. Due to these proven adverse effects of existing therapies, various novel therapeutic techniques have emerged in the near past. Nano formulation is one of them. It is a practical therapeutic strategy to minimize pharmacological therapy's side effects and nontargeted distribution. Nanomaterials are suitable for treating CVDs due to their small size, which enables them to reach more sites of the heart and arteries. The biological safety, bioavailability, and solubility of the drugs have been increased due to the encapsulation of natural products and their derivatives of drugs.

The future of artificial intelligence in neurosurgery: A narrative review.

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) algorithms are on the tremendous rise for being incorporated into the field of neurosurgery. AI and ML algorithms are different from other technological advances as giving the capability for the computer to learn, reason, and problem-solving skills that a human inherits. This review summarizes the current use of AI in neurosurgery, the challenges that need to be addressed, and what the future holds. Methods: A literature review was carried out with a focus on the use of AI in the field of neurosurgery and its future implication in neurosurgical research. Results: The online literature on the use of AI in the field of neurosurgery shows the diversity of topics in terms of its current and future implications. The main areas that are being studied are diagnostic, outcomes, and treatment models. Conclusion: Wonders of AI in the field of medicine and neurosurgery hold true, yet there are a lot of challenges that need to be addressed before its implications can be seen in the field of neurosurgery from patient privacy, to access to high-quality data and overreliance on surgeons on AI. The future of AI in neurosurgery is pointed toward a patient-centric approach, managing clinical tasks, and helping in diagnosing and preoperative assessment of the patients.

Assessing the Degree of Acute Esophageal Injury Secondary to Corrosive Intake: Insights From a Public Sector Hospitals of a Developing Country.

Background Caustic ingestion continues to be a significant problem worldwide especially in developing countries and particularly in the age group of under six years. Ingestion of caustic substances is a medical emergency in both the adult and pediatric population and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The ingestion of caustic substances induces an extensive spectrum of injuries to the aerodigestive tract, which includes extensive necrosis and perforation of the esophagus and stomach. Objectives The main aims were to determine upper and lower esophageal injuries associated with corrosive intake and to compare esophageal injury with age and gender. Rationale Once we'll find the extent and severity of esophageal injury associated with corrosive intake within 24 hours, we'll be able to manage the case timely and to limit further complications and disabilities. Materials and Methods This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 150 patients who presented with corrosive ingestion and underwent urgent endoscopic evaluation. Data were collected using self-designed pro forma. Endoscopic findings were classified according to the Zargar classification. A descriptive analysis of study variables was performed using SPSS v.21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The chi-square test was used, and a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Out of 150 patients under study, 103 (68.7%) were females and 47 (31.3%) were males. The most prevalent age group presenting with corrosive intake was found to be between 21 and 34 years of age (43.3%) in both genders. The most common part of the esophagus prone to corrosive insult is the upper esophagus (99.3%), whereas, regarding severity, the lower esophagus has more severe injuries (predominant being stage 2B, i.e., 32%). There are no statistically significant differences in esophageal injuries in different age groups (upper esophageal injury: 0.319; lower esophageal injury: 0.696) and genders (upper esophageal injury: 0.769; lower esophageal injury: 0.752).  Conclusions Most of the patients under study belong to the female gender and teen and younger age group. The predominant upper esophageal injury as a result of corrosive intake is stage 0 injury, and the least common is found to be stage 1 injury. The predominant lower esophageal injury as a result of corrosive intake is stage 2B injury, whereas the least common is found to be stage 4 injury.