Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Publication year range
1.
Int J Hematol ; 114(1): 85-93, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33740219

ABSTRACT

The optimal conditioning regimen for stem cell transplantation in elderly patients remains to be established. We developed a novel preparative regimen using fludarabine 180 mg/m2, intravenous busulfan 12.8 mg/m2, cytarabine 8 g/m2, and 4-Gy total body irradiation before cord blood transplantation (CBT) in patients older than 55 years with various hematological malignancies. All but one patient received graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisting of cyclosporine (CsA) and short-term methotrexate (sMTX). Thirty-three patients were included in this study, with a median age of 64 years (range 56-70). The disease risk index was high or very high in 67% of patients, and 73% had a disease status other than complete remission. The probabilities of overall survival and disease-free survival at 3 years were 60 and 57%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality at 3 years were 18 and 25%, respectively. Regimen-related toxicities were generally tolerable. Disease-free survivors (n = 20) stopped immunosuppressants at a median of 7.4 months (range 2.6-25.0), in all cases by the time of the last follow-up. In conclusion, this highly myeloablative conditioning regimen resulted in a high probability of disease-free, GVHD-free, immunosuppressant-free survival after single CBT.(190 words).


Subject(s)
Busulfan/therapeutic use , Cytarabine/therapeutic use , Fetal Blood/transplantation , Myeloablative Agonists/therapeutic use , Vidarabine/analogs & derivatives , Aged , Female , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Treatment Outcome , Vidarabine/therapeutic use , Whole-Body Irradiation
2.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho ; 31(12): 2005-8, 2004 Nov.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15570929

ABSTRACT

We have a randomized trial to compare the operability and safety of ten 24-gauge intravenous catheters in the infusion room. In the present study, we used 3 intravenous catheters without safety covers (Jelco plus, Surflo flash, Intima) and 7 intravenous catheters with safety covers (Supercath, Introcan safety, Surshield surflo II, Insyte autoguard, Safetouch cath, Protective plus, Acuvance plus). All catheters were used 40 times. The detainment rate of the first time puncture and the incidence of needle accidents with Jelco plus and Insyte autoguard were 98% and 0%, respectively, against 100% and 0%, respectively, for all other catheters. There was no difference in the incidence of these two events in all groups (ANOVA; p > 0.05). On the other hand, all intravenous catheters with safety covers revealed that 1) an in situ needle has a resistance to the catheter (i.e., a resistance during catheter release), and/or 2) blood exposure can not be sufficiently avoided.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Peripheral/instrumentation , Infusions, Intravenous/instrumentation , Needles/standards , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Safety , Humans , Needles/adverse effects , Needlestick Injuries/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL