Prognostic impact of nutrition measures in patients with heart failure varies with coexisting physical frailty.

AIMS: Malnutrition is prevalent among patients with heart failure (HF); however, the effects of coexisting malnutrition and frailty on prognosis are unknown. This study examines the impact of malnutrition and frailty on the prognosis of patients with HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined 1617 patients with HF aged 65 years or older (age: 78.6 ± 7.4; 44% female) from a Japanese multicentre prospective cohort study. The nutritional status was evaluated using the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT), and Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form on discharge. Frailty was assessed using the criteria determined in a previous study on patients with HF. The prognostic impact of each nutrition measure on the risk of composite all-cause mortality and cardiac readmissions within 2 years of hospital discharge was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards model analysis for non-frail and frail groups. Over 2324.2 person-years of follow-up, 88 patients died and 448 patients experienced readmission due to HF. In the non-frail group, poor nutritional status assessed using the GNRI and CONUT was associated with an increased hazard ratio (HR) of composite outcomes in the crude model; however, adjustment for potential confounders diminished the association. In the frail group, all three nutritional indicators were associated with the cumulative incidence of the study outcome (log-rank test, P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, only the CONUT score was associated with an increased HR even after adjustment for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: The CONUT score predicted a poor prognosis in HF patients with coexisting physical frailty, highlighting the potential clinical benefit of nutritional assessment based on biochemical data for further risk stratification.

Prognostic effects of cardiac rehabilitation in heart failure patients classified according to physical frailty: A propensity score-matched analysis of a nationwide prospective cohort study.

Background: Research regarding cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in the prognosis of heart failure (HF) patients and frailty remains lacking. Here, the effects of CR on the 2-year prognosis of HF patients were examined according to their frailty status. Methods: This multicenter prospective cohort study enrolled patients hospitalized for HF. Patients who underwent ≥1 session per 2 weeks of CR within 3 months after discharge were categorized in the CR group. Patients were divided in a non-frailty (≤8 points) and physical frailty group (≥9 points) based on their FLAGSHIP frailty score. The score is based on HF prognosis, with a higher score indicating worsened physical frailty. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to compare survival rates between the two groups according to their physical frailty status. Endpoints included HF re-hospitalization and all-cause mortality during a 2-year follow-up period. Results: Of 2697 patients included in the analysis, 285 and 95 matched pairs were distributed in the non-frailty and physical frailty groups, respectively, after propensity-score matching. CR was associated with lower incidence of HF rehospitalization in both non-frailty (hazard ratio 0.65; 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.96; p = 0.032) and physical frailty (0.54; 0.32-0.90; p = 0.019) groups. CR was not associated with all-cause mortality in either group (log-rank test, p > 0.05). Conclusion: These findings suggest the effects of CR on reduced HF rehospitalization, regardless of physical frailty status.

Factors Associated With Changes in Objectively Measured Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity in Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to clarify factors affecting changes in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in patients 1 to 3 months after undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we enrolled patients aged <75 years who underwent PCI. MVPA was objectively measured using an accelerometer at 1 and 3 months after hospital discharge. Factors associated with increased MVPA (≥150 min/wk at 3 mo) were analyzed in participants with MVPA < 150 minutes per week at 1 month. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to explore variables potentially associated with increasing MVPA, using MVPA ≥ 150 minutes per week at 3 months as the dependent variable. Factors associated with decreased MVPA (<150 min/wk at 3 mo) were also analyzed in participants with MVPA ≥ 150 minutes per week at 1 month. Logistic regression analysis was performed to explore factors of declining MVPA, using MVPA < 150 minutes per week at 3 months as the dependent variable. RESULTS: We analyzed 577 patients (median age 64 y, 13.5% female, and 20.6% acute coronary syndrome). Increased MVPA was significantly associated with participation in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation (odds ratio 3.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-11.0), left main trunk stenosis (13.0; 2.49-68.2), diabetes mellitus (0.42; 0.22-0.81), and hemoglobin (1.47, per 1 SD; 1.09-1.97). Decreased MVPA was significantly associated with depression (0.31; 0.14-0.74) and Self-Efficacy for Walking (0.92, per 1 point; 0.86-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Identifying patient factors associated with changes in MVPA may provide insight into behavioral changes and help with individualized PA promotion.

Impact of arm circumference on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Background: Although Arm circumference (AC) is considered to be a predictor of clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), limited data are available on the impact of this anthropometric measurement. This study aimed to investigate the clinical impact of AC on the outcomes of patients who underwent TAVR. Methods: AC was investigated in consecutive patients who underwent TAVR between March 2014 and May 2018. Patients were divided into low AC (n = 220) and high AC (n = 127) groups by a classification and regression tree (CART) survival model, and their baseline characteristics and mortality were compared. The correlations of AC with other frailty markers were also evaluated. Results: One-year clinical follow-up was completed in 100% of cases, and 89 patients (31 men, 58 women) died during the median follow-up period of 825 days. The low AC group was more fragile than the high AC group, and the AC value was significantly correlated with each frailty marker (all p < 0.05). The Cox regression analysis demonstrated the independent association of mortality with low AC (HR: 2.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.47-4.46, p < 0.001). When AC was compared to conventional prediction models of survival, the net reclassification improvement and the integrated discrimination improvement analysis showed significant improvements in predicting outcomes after including the AC with other frailty markers (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: The AC is related to frailty markers and is an important surrogate marker for predicting worse clinical outcomes after TAVR. Assessment of AC may be considered when deciding on TAVR.

Prognostic Effects of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients With Heart Failure (from a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study).

The prognostic effects of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) are inconsistent in recent reports on heart failure (HF). Generally, participants in previous trials were relatively young and had HF with reduced ejection fraction. Herein, we examined the effects of CR on HF prognosis using a nationwide cohort study. This multicenter prospective cohort study included hospitalized patients with acute HF or worsening chronic HF. Patients who underwent CR once or more times weekly for 6 months after discharge were included in the CR group. The main study end point was a composite of all-cause mortality and HF rehospitalization during a 2-year follow-up period. We performed propensity score matching to compare the survival rates between the CR and non-CR groups. Of the 2,876 enrolled patients, 313 underwent CR for 6 months. After propensity score matching using confounding factors, 626 patients (313 pairs) were included in the survival analysis (median age: 74 years). CR was associated with a reduced risk of composite outcomes (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48 to 0.91; p = 0.011), all-cause mortality (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.95; p = 0.032), and HF rehospitalization (HR 0.66; 95% CI 47 to 0.92; p = 0.012). Subgroup analysis showed similar CR effects in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (≥50%) and HF with reduced ejection fraction (<40%). In the landmark analysis, CR did not reduce the aforementioned end points beyond 6 months after discharge (log-rank test: composite outcomes, p = 0.943; all-cause mortality, p = 0.258; HF rehospitalization, p = 0.831). CR is a standard treatment for HF regardless of HF type; however, further challenges may affect the long-term prognostic effects of CR.

Impact of weight loss in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: results from the FLAGSHIP study.

AIMS: Weight loss (WL) is a poor prognostic factor for patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. However, its prognostic impact on patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains unestablished. The evidence regarding the effects of obesity on the prognosis of WL is also unclear. We aimed to identify the risk factors for WL and examine the association between WL and prognosis of HFpEF in obese and non-obese patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multicentre cohort study, the data of 573 patients hospitalized with HFpEF [median age: 78 years (interquartile range, 71-84 years); 49.2% female] were identified from hospital databases. WL was defined as ≥5% weight reduction within 6 months after discharge. Obesity was defined according to Japanese criteria as body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 . The main study outcomes were all-cause mortality and HF rehospitalization between 6 and 24 months after hospital discharge. Logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were performed to identify independent the risk factors associated with WL and to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) associated with adverse outcomes. The prevalence of obesity at discharge was 21.1%. At 6 month follow-up, WL occurred in 17.4% and 10.8% of the obese and non-obese patients, respectively. Onset of WL in non-obese patients was associated with prior hospitalization for HF [odds ratio (OR) 2.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22-4.68, P = 0.011] and high levels of brain natriuretic peptide (OR 2.32, CI 1.17-4.60, P = 0.015). In obese patients, WL was associated with the use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (OR 3.26, CI 1.08-9.76, P = 0.03) and vasopressin receptor antagonists (OR 6.61, CI 2.03-21.2, P = 0.001). During 1021.3 person-years of follow-up, 31 patients died, and upon 1081.0 person-years follow-up, 84 patients required rehospitalization for HF. In proportional hazards analysis, WL was associated with all-cause mortality (HR 5.12, CI 2.08-12.5, P < 0.001) and HF rehospitalization (HR 2.63, CI 1.38-5.01, P = 0.003) after adjustment for confounders in non-obese patients, but not in obese patients. CONCLUSIONS: Weight loss should be considered as an indicator for monitoring worsening of HF condition in non-obese patients with HFpEF. WL was not associated with adverse events in obese patients with HFpEF, possibly due to appropriate fluid management during follow-up.

Association between a pre-admission limitation in walking ability and post-discharge adverse outcomes among hospitalized patients with heart failure: Report from a multicenter prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Although limited walking ability at discharge is a known risk factor for adverse outcomes in older patients with heart failure (HF), the association between pre-admission limitations and adverse outcomes is unknown. Therefore, we evaluated the prevalence of a pre-admission limitation in walking ability and its relationship with post-discharge outcomes among patients with HF with reduced, mid-range, and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF). METHODS: We followed 2042 patients aged ≥65 years (HFrEF, n = 668; HFmrEF, n = 360; HFpEF, n = 1014) from a multicenter cohort study in Japan. A limitation in walking ability was defined as the necessity of any assistance or a walking aid. Adverse outcomes were defined as the composite of HF rehospitalization and all-cause death within 2 years after discharge. RESULTS: During 2978.0 person-years of follow-up, 563 patients were rehospitalized due to HF exacerbation and 103 patients died. In HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF groups, the prevalence of a pre-admission limitation in walking ability was 12.1%, 18.6%, and 21.1%, respectively, the crude hazard ratios [95% confidence interval] of a pre-admission limitation in walking ability were 2.46 [1.79-3.39], 1.34 [0.87-2.06], and 1.94 [1.53-2.47], and the adjusted hazard ratios were 2.21 [1.58-3.16], 1.19 [0.75-1.89], and 1.39 [1.06-1.82], respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A pre-admission limitation in walking ability is a predictor of post-discharge HF rehospitalization or all-cause death among patients with HFrEF and HFpEF, but not among patients with HFmrEF. Shortly after admission, information regarding pre-admission functional limitations should be obtained to better understand the risk of post-discharge adverse outcomes.

Secondary prevention of new vascular events with lifestyle intervention in patients with noncardioembolic mild ischemic stroke: a single-center randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Lifestyle modification is associated with a substantially decreased risk of cardiovascular events. However, the role of lifestyle intervention for secondary prevention in patients with noncardioembolic ischemic stroke is inadequately defined. We assessed the hypothesis that lifestyle intervention can reduce the onset of new vascular events in patients with noncardioembolic mild ischemic stroke. METHODS: We conducted an observer-blind randomized controlled trial that enrolled 70 patients (48 men, mean age 63.5 years) with acute noncardioembolic mild ischemic stroke. The patients were allocated in equal numbers to a lifestyle intervention group or a control group. We performed lifestyle interventions, which comprised exercise training, salt restriction and nutrition advice for 24 weeks. Then all patients were prospectively followed up for occurrence of the primary endpoints, including hospitalization due to stroke recurrence and the onset of other vascular events. We also evaluated systolic blood pressure (SBP) at the clinic and at home, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) to compare the efficacy of the lifestyle interventions. RESULTS: This trial was terminated earlier than expected because of the prespecified early stopping rule for efficacy. After the 24-week intervention period, the intervention group showed a significant increase in daily physical activity and a significant decrease in salt intake (physical activity, p = 0.012; salt intake, p < 0.001), with a significant difference between the randomized groups (physical activity, p < 0.001; salt intake, p = 0.018). Similarly, blood pressure was decreased and the HDL-C levels were increased in the intervention group (SBP, p < 0.001; HDL-C, p = 0.018), with significant differences between the randomized groups (SBP, p < 0.001; HDL-C, p = 0.022). In contrast, LDL-C, HbA1c and hs-CRP tended to decrease in the intervention group, but this decrease did not achieve significance. After a median follow-up period of 2.9 years, 12 patients allocated to the control group and 1 patient in the lifestyle intervention group experienced at least 1 vascular event. A sequential plans analysis indicated the superiority of the lifestyle intervention in interim analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves after the log-rank test showed a significant prognostic difference between the randomized groups (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Lifestyle intervention with appropriate medication is beneficial for reducing the incidence of new vascular events and improving vascular risk factors in patients with noncardioembolic mild ischemic stroke.