Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Contin Educ Nurs ; 47(10): 446-448, 2016 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27699432

ABSTRACT

Clinical culture contaminations delay the correct diagnosis, result in repeat testing, and may extend the length of a hospital stay. A simple educational session reminding providers of the ubiquitous presence of bacteria on the skin and in our environment, led to a significant decrease in contaminated cultures (16.9% versus 10.9%, p = 0.03). J Contin Educ Nurs. 2016;47(10):446-448.


Subject(s)
Disinfection/methods , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Hand Disinfection/methods , Health Personnel/education , Microbiology/education , Skin/microbiology , Adult , Female , Hospital Units , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 60(3): 341-8, 2015 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25352591

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: After a case of rabies, healthcare workers (HCWs) had fear of contagion from the infected patient. Although transmission of rabies to HCWs has never been documented, high-risk exposures theoretically include direct contact of broken skin and/or mucosa with saliva, tears, oropharyngeal secretions, cerebrospinal fluid, and neural tissue. Urine/kidney exposure posed a concern, as our patient's renal transplant was identified as the infection source. METHODS: Our risk assessment included (1) identification of exposed HCWs; (2) notification of HCWs; (3) risk assessment using a tool from the local health department; (4) supplemental screening for urine/kidney exposure; and (5) postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) when indicated. RESULTS: A total of 222 HCWs including diverse hospital staff and medical trainees from university affiliates were evaluated. Risk screening was initiated within 2 hours of rabies confirmation, and 95% of HCWs were assessed within the first 8 days. There were 8 high-risk exposures related to broken skin contact or mucosal splash with the patient's secretions, and 1 person without high-risk contact sought and received PEP outside our hospital. Nine HCWs (4%) received PEP with good tolerance. Due to fear of rabies transmission, additional HCWs without direct patient contact required counseling. There have been no secondary cases after our sentinel rabies patient. CONCLUSIONS: Rabies exposure represents a major concern for HCWs and requires rapid, comprehensive risk screening and counseling of staff and timely PEP. Given the lack of human-to-human rabies transmission from our own experience and the literature, a conservative approach seems appropriate for providing PEP to HCWs.


Subject(s)
Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Post-Exposure Prophylaxis , Rabies/transmission , Health Personnel , Hospitals , Humans , Kidney Transplantation , Rabies/epidemiology , Rabies/prevention & control , Risk Assessment , Saliva , Skin/injuries
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...