Efficacy and safety of eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester (AMR101) therapy in statin-treated patients with persistent high triglycerides (from the ANCHOR study).

AMR101 is an ω-3 fatty acid agent containing ≥96% pure icosapent-ethyl, the ethyl ester of eicosapentaenoic acid. The efficacy and safety of AMR101 were evaluated in this phase 3, multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blinded, 12-week clinical trial (ANCHOR) in high-risk statin-treated patients with residually high triglyceride (TG) levels (≥200 and <500 mg/dl) despite low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol control (≥40 and <100 mg/dl). Patients (n = 702) on a stable diet were randomized to AMR101 4 or 2 g/day or placebo. The primary end point was median percent change in TG levels from baseline versus placebo at 12 weeks. AMR101 4 and 2 g/day significantly decreased TG levels by 21.5% (p <0.0001) and 10.1% (p = 0.0005), respectively, and non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol by 13.6% (p <0.0001) and 5.5% (p = 0.0054), respectively. AMR101 4 g/day produced greater TG and non-HDL cholesterol decreases in patients with higher-efficacy statin regimens and greater TG decreases in patients with higher baseline TG levels. AMR101 4 g/day decreased LDL cholesterol by 6.2% (p = 0.0067) and decreased apolipoprotein B (9.3%), total cholesterol (12.0%), very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (24.4%), lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) (19.0%), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (22.0%) versus placebo (p <0.001 for all comparisons). AMR101 was generally well tolerated, with safety profiles similar to placebo. In conclusion, AMR101 4 g/day significantly decreased median placebo-adjusted TG, non-HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, total cholesterol, very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in statin-treated patients with residual TG elevations.

Eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester (AMR101) therapy in patients with very high triglyceride levels (from the Multi-center, plAcebo-controlled, Randomized, double-blINd, 12-week study with an open-label Extension [MARINE] trial).

AMR101 is an omega-3 fatty acid agent containing ≥96% eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester and no docosahexaenoic acid. Previous smaller studies suggested that highly purified eicosapentaenoic acid lowered triglyceride (TG) levels without increasing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. TG-lowering therapies such as fibrates, and fish oils containing both eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid, can substantially increase LDL cholesterol levels when administered to patients with very high TG levels (≥500 mg/dl). The present double-blind study randomized 229 diet-stable patients with fasting TG ≥500 mg/dl and ≤2,000 mg/dl (with or without background statin therapy) to AMR101 4 g/day, AMR101 2 g/day, or placebo. The primary end point was the placebo-corrected median percentage of change in TG from baseline to week 12. The baseline TG level was 680, 657, and 703 mg/dl for AMR101 4 g/day, AMR101 2 g/day, and placebo. AMR101 4 g/day reduced the placebo-corrected TG levels by 33.1% (n = 76, p <0.0001) and AMR101 2 g/day by 19.7% (n = 73, p = 0.0051). For a baseline TG level >750 mg/dl, AMR101 4 g/day reduced the placebo-corrected TG levels by 45.4% (n = 28, p = 0.0001) and AMR101 2 g/day by 32.9% (n = 28, p = 0.0016). AMR101 did not significantly increase the placebo-corrected median LDL cholesterol levels at 4 g/day (-2.3%) or 2 g/day (+5.2%; both p = NS). AMR101 significantly reduced non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2), very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and total cholesterol. AMR101 was generally well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to that of the placebo. In conclusion, the present randomized, double-blind trial of patients with very high TG levels demonstrated that AMR101 significantly reduced the TG levels and improved other lipid parameters without significantly increasing the LDL cholesterol levels.

Carotid atherosclerosis progression in familial hypercholesterolemia patients: a pooled analysis of the ASAP, ENHANCE, RADIANCE 1, and CAPTIVATE studies.

BACKGROUND: Until recently, patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) were considered the best subjects for the assessment of changes in carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) in randomized intervention trials. Our aims were to investigate whether contemporary statin-treated HeFH patients still show accelerated cIMT increase and to assess the impact of statin treatment, before and after random assignment, on atherosclerosis progression. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively evaluated cIMT change, and prior statin treatment and postbaseline LDL-C change as predictors of cIMT change, in 1513 HeFH patients who were randomly assigned to the statin arms of the early ASAP and more recent RADIANCE 1, CAPTIVATE, and ENHANCE studies. In the 3 recent studies combined, mean cIMT increased at only 33%of the rate of the simvastatin-treated patients in the ASAP study (0.014 mm/2 years [95% confidence interval, -0.0003-0.028] versus 0.041 mm/2 years [95% confidence interval, 0.020-0.061]; P<0.05). Patients whose statin therapy could be intensified, as evidenced by an LDL-C decrease after the initiation of on-trial statin therapy, showed cIMT decrease in the first 6 to 12 months and a much lower cIMT increase measured over the full 2 years. In line with this, previously statin-naive HeFH patients showed a lower overall cIMT increase. CONCLUSIONS: Over the years, intensification of statin therapy in HeFH patients has resulted in an impressive decrease in carotid atherosclerosis progression. In studies that assess other antiatherosclerotic modalities, statin therapy may still induce rapid changes in cIMT. For future cIMT studies, our analyses suggest that patient populations other than intensively pretreated HeFH patients should be selected and that the statin regimen should not be changed on study initiation.

Risk reduction and tolerability of fluvastatin in patients with the metabolic syndrome: a pooled analysis of thirty clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: This pooled analysis of 30 completed clinical trials assessed the efficacy and safety profile in reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk of fluvastatin in the treatment of dyslipidemia in patients with and without the metabolic syndrome (metS). METHODS: Data from 30 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled or fluvastatin-controlled trials with > or =6 weeks of active treatment and daily fluvastatin doses of 20, 40, and 80 mg were pooled. Patients received fluvastatin or placebo. Linear contrasts from an analysis of covariance model containing factors for trial and treatment group (immediate-release fluvastatin 20, 40, 80 mg; extended-release fluvastatin 80 rag; or placebo), and using the baseline value as covariate, were used to compare the percentage changes from baseline to the first postbaseline assessment of all lipid parameters. A Cox regression analysis compared the all-fluvastatin group to the placebo group with regard to the time to occurrence of clinical end points from 5 pooled studies, each with a mean treatment duration >1 year wherein clinical end points were reviewed by an adjudication committee. These analyses were performed separately for patients with and without metS. RESULTS: This pooled analysis included data from 7043 patients (4095 men, 2948 women; all-fluvastatin group with and without metS, 2529 and 2052 patients, respectively; placebo group with and without metS, 1514 and 948 patients, respectively). Patients with metS in the pooled fluvastatin group had a greater mean reduction in triglyceride levels (24.1% vs 6.7%), a greater mean increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (10.3% vs -0.6%), and a similar mean reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (26.8% vs 26.7%) compared with the subgroup of patients without metS. Treatment with fluvastatin was associated with a significantly lower incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (16.4% vs 22.0%) and an increase in the time to first MACE in patients with metS compared with placebo (hazard ratio = 0.728; P = 0.001). The incidences of adverse events, particularly those of concern (ie, myalgia and/ or increased blood creatine phosphokinase, alanine aminotransferase, and/or aspartate aminotransferase) with lipid-lowering therapy, were statistically similar between the patients who received fluvastatin and those who received placebo in the 2 subgroups. CONCLUSION: The results from this pooled analysis found that fluvastatin was effective in reducing CVD risk in the treatment of dyslipidemia in these patients with metS.

Effects of baseline level of triglycerides on changes in lipid levels from combined fluvastatin + fibrate (bezafibrate, fenofibrate, or gemfibrozil).

This analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of baseline triglyceride levels on lipid and lipoprotein changes after treatment with the combination of fluvastatin and fibrates. The analysis involved pooling data from 10 studies that included 1,018 patients with either mixed hyperlipidemia or primary hypercholesterolemia. Patients received a combination of fluvastatin and a fibrate (bezafibrate, fenofibrate, or gemfibrozil) from 16 to 108 weeks. The combination of fluvastatin and a fibrate improved lipid profiles, with reductions in triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol that were dependent on baseline triglyceride levels. The greatest triglyceride reductions were observed in patients with high baseline triglyceride levels (> or =400 mg/dl) (41%, p <0.0001). The greatest LDL cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol reductions occurred in patients with normal baseline triglyceride levels (<150 mg/dl) (35% and 33%, respectively; p <0.0001). The combined fluvastatin-fibrate therapy was well tolerated. Two patients (0.2%) (1 patient on fluvastatin 80 mg + gemfibrozil 1,200 mg and 1 patient on fluvastatin 20 mg + fenofibrate 200 mg) had creatine kinase levels > or =10 times the upper limit of normal, 11 patients (1.1%) had an elevation in alanine transaminase >3 times the upper limit of normal, and 7 patients (0.7%) had elevations in aspartate transaminase >3 times the upper limit of normal. Combined fluvastatin-fibrate therapy takes advantage of the complementary effects of the 2 agents, with the extent of triglyceride, LDL cholesterol, and non-HDL cholesterol lowering dependent on baseline triglyceride levels. The combination of fluvastatin and fibrates was well tolerated with no major safety concerns.

Comparison of treatment with fluvastatin extended-release 80-mg tablets and immediate-release 40-mg capsules in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: According to the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III guidelines, hypercholesterolemic patients with greater risk for cardiovascular heart disease require more aggressive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Numerous studies have demonstrated that despite these guidelines, patients often do not reach their target levels, and that physicians frequently do not titrate the drug beyond the starting dose. For these patients, it may be more suitable to initiate treatment with a higher starting dose of statin. With the immediate-release (IR) formulation of fluvastatin, the maximal dose of 80 mg is recommended to be administered in divided doses (40 mg BID). An extended-release (ER) formulation of fluvastatin at a higher dose (fluvastatin ER 80 mg) was designed to provide greater LDL-C lowering with QD dosing. Use of this formulation should bring more patients into compliance with target LDL-C levels. OBJECTIVE: This analysis compared the efficacy and tolerability of fluvastatin ER 80 mg QD and fluvastatin IR 40 mg QD in lowering total cholesterol, LDL-C, triglyceride, and apolipoprotein (apo) B levels and raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and apo A-I levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia over a 12-week treatment period. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled study Patients with primary hypercholesterolemia who qualified for lipid-lowering drug therapy based on NCEP ATP II guidelines were randomized to fluvastatin ER 80 mg QD or fluvastatin IR 40 mg QD, and treated for 12 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients were randomized to treatment: 86 to the fluvastatin ER 80-mg group and 87 to the fluvastatin IR 40-mg group. Compared with fluvastatin IR 40 mg, fluvastatin ER 80 mg produced greater mean reductions in LDL-C (32% vs 22%, respectively; P < 0.001). For each of the 3 coronary heart disease (CHD) risk groups (defined by the NCEP), as well as for the total population studied, more patients from the fluvastatin ER 80-mg group than the IR 40 group achieved NCEP ATP II target LDL-C levels (79% vs 47%, respectively [P = NS], for patients with < 2 risk factors; 58% vs 15%, respectively [P < 0.001], for patients with > or = 2 risk factors; and 40% vs 14%, respectively [P = 0.012], for patients with CHD). The 80-mg ER dose of fluvastatin provided 9.1% greater LDL-C lowering than the 40-mg IR dose. The incidence of elevations in transaminase levels was low and similar for both doses, with 1 patient in each of the treatment groups being discontinued due to repeated elevation of transaminases > 3 x the upper limit of normal (ULN). Clinically relevant elevations in creatine kinase (ie, > or = 10x ULN) were not observed with either dose. Nine patients (5 in the fluvastatin ER group and 4 in the fluvastatin IR group) discontinued because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with fluvastatin ER 80 mg resulted in greater reductions in LDL-C, total cholesterol, and apo B levels compared with fluvastatin IR 40 mg, with clinically equivalent reduction in triglyceride levels and elevation of HDL-C levels. Furthermore, there were few tolerability concerns of clinical relevance with either formulation and no clinically meaningful difference in the tolerability parameters between the 2 formulations. For patients with higher baseline LDL-C levels, and for patients who require greater LDL-C lowering, it may be appropriate to initiate therapy with fluvastatin ER 80 mg. Use of the higher starting dose likely would bring a greater proportion of high-risk patients into compliance with NCEP ATP II target LDL-C levels and would provide LDL-C lowering that is in the same range that has been proved in clinical trials to be associated with reductions in CHD event rates.

The challenges of conducting clinical endpoint studies.

In order to evaluate the effects of a particular treatment strategy on mortality and major morbidity within a disease entity, large, multinational, relatively long-term clinical endpoint studies are often conducted. The primary challenge of conducting these studies is to maintain consistency in the interpretation of the clinical endpoints across different geographic areas and over the long time course of the study. The success of a clinical endpoint study depends on understanding the challenges and incorporating the special requirements of these studies into the protocol design and operational procedures throughout the study.