Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol ; 27(4): 389-92, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17009632

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to reclassify endometrial hyperplasia cases and examine PTEN protein immunoreactivity compared to cases with endometrial adenocarcinoma and proliferative endometrium. DESIGN: Endometrial samples from 37 women with endometrial hyperplasia with atypia were reclassified as endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN). Eighteen were complex and 19 were simple endometrial hyperplasia. Twenty-our cases of EIN, ten endometrial adenocarcinoma cases and ten proliferative phase endometrium sections were immunostained for PTEN expression. PTEN expression was documented according to the degree of immunoreactivity as complete loss, partial loss and present. RESULTS: Twenty-four of 37 (64%) women with endometrial hyperplasia were reclassified as EIN. Complete loss of PTEN immunoreactivity was found in only one of the 24 EIN patients (4.2%), partial loss in eight of 24 (33.3%) and present in 15 of 24 (62.5%). There were no difference in PTEN immunoreactivity between EIN, endometrial adenocarcinoma and endometrial proliferation (p = 0.342). PTEN immunoreactivity was partially lost in seven and present in three of the patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma. None of the patients expressed complete loss of PTEN immunoreactivity in this group. CONCLUSION: EIN classification may provide a better and more objective assessment of endometrial hyperplasia cases. PTEN expression showed no differences among the cases of EIN, endometrial carcinoma and proliferative phase endometrium.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/metabolism , Cell Proliferation , Endometrial Hyperplasia/metabolism , Endometrial Neoplasms/metabolism , Endometrium/metabolism , PTEN Phosphohydrolase/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Endometrial Hyperplasia/pathology , Endometrial Neoplasms/classification , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Endometrium/pathology , Female , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Middle Aged , Precancerous Conditions/metabolism , Precancerous Conditions/pathology , Retrospective Studies
2.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol ; 27(3): 256-61, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16800253

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the proliferative effect of different hormone regimens and estrogen receptor modulation on mammary glands in a rat model of surgical menopause. DESIGN: Experimental animal study. SETTING: University Hospital. INTERVENTION: In a rat model of surgical menopause, 78 adult Sprague Dawley female rats were ovariectomized and treated with estrogen, estrogen combined with continuous or intermittent progesterone or the estrogen receptor modulator raloxifene and their respective vehicle controls. Following intraperitoneal drug administration for 20 days, rats were perfused, mammary glands were removed, tissues were processed for immunohistochemical (Ki-67) and hematoxylin-eosin staining, and investigated under light microscope. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Histopathological examination of mammary glands and Ki-67 positive cells (proliferation index). RESULTS: Histological examination showed dilatation in the duct cysts and vacuolization in the epithelial cells in groups receiving progestin, either intermittent or continuous. Histological findings in the raloxifene group were no different from the control group, and the atrophic terminal ductal lobular unit in adipose tissue rich stroma was similar to postmenopausal breast. In animals with a proliferative response, increased proliferation started and dominated in the terminal ductal lobular unit epithelium. Comparison of Ki-67 proliferation indices between groups revealed that estrogen alone or combined with intermittent progesterone yielded significantly higher Ki-67 indices compared to controls; estrogen combined with continuous progesterone also resulted in increasing the probability of proliferation, but the effect was not as pronounced as the other two groups. Raloxifene treatment, on the other hand, did not cause proliferation. CONCLUSION: Estrogen alone or combined with progesterone may increase the risk of breast cancer by enhancing proliferation in the TDLU; raloxifen does not induce proliferation and may be a safe estrogen receptor modulator regarding its effects on mammary glands during menopause.


Subject(s)
Hormone Replacement Therapy , Mammary Glands, Animal/drug effects , Ovariectomy , Animals , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Estrogen Antagonists/pharmacology , Estrogens/pharmacology , Female , Ki-67 Antigen/analysis , Mammary Glands, Animal/cytology , Progesterone/pharmacology , Raloxifene Hydrochloride/pharmacology , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...