Residues and Safety Assessment of Cyantraniliprole and Indoxacarb in Wild Garlic (Allium vineale).

In this study, the residual behavior and safety of cyantraniliprole and indoxacarb applied to wild garlic (Allium vineale) were investigated. Samples were harvested after treatments of 0, 3, 7, and 14 days, then were prepared and extracted following the QuEChERS method and analyzed by UPLC-MS/MS. The linearity (R2 ≥ 0.99) of the calibration curves was excellent for both compounds. The average recoveries of cyantraniliprole and indoxacarb at two spiking concentrations (0.01 and 0.1 mg/kg) ranged from 94.2% to 111.4%. The relative standard deviation value was below 10%. The initial concentrations of cyantraniliprole and indoxacarb in wild garlic were degraded to 75% and 93% after seven days. The average half-lives were 1.83 and 1.14 days for cyantraniliprole and indoxacarb, respectively. The preharvest intervals (PHIs) for the two pesticides in wild garlic are recommended as two treatments seven days before harvest. The safety assessment data indicated that the percent acceptable daily intakes of cyantraniliprole and indoxacarb were 0.3 × 10-4% and 6.7 × 10-2%, respectively, in wild garlic. The theoretical maximum daily intake value of cyantraniliprole was 9.80%, and that of indoxacarb was 60.54%. Both compounds' residues in wild garlic pose low health risks to consumers. The findings of the current investigation provide essential data for the safe use of cyantraniliprole and indoxacarb in wild garlic.

Residual characteristics and safety assessment of the insecticides spiromesifen and chromafenozide in lettuce and perilla.

This study was performed to investigate the residual characteristics, safety assessment, and pre-harvest interval (PHI) of spiromesifen and chromafenozide in lettuce (Latuca sativa L.) and perilla (Perilla frutescens (L.) Britton) leaves. Samples were harvested periodically, extracted using QuEChERS method, and analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Average recoveries of spiromesifen and its metabolite BSN2060-enol and chromafenozide were ranged from 80.6 to 107.9%, with relative standard deviation < 10%. Spiromesifen and cromafenozide initial residues in lettuce were dissipated to 81.45 and 95.52% after 7 days, with half-lives of 2.89 and 1.69 days respectively. Values in perilla leaves were 76.68 and 61.27% after the same period, with half-lives of 4.25 and 6.30 days, respectively. Risk assessment results showed that %ADI (acceptable daily intake) of spiromesifen and chromafenozide was 6.83 and 0.56, in lettuce and 4.60 and 0.25% in perilla leaves, respectively. Theoretical maximum daily intakes of spiromesifen and chromafenozide were 67.49 and 3.43%, respectively, indicating that residues of both compounds pose no considerable health risks to consumers. This study provides data for setting maximum residue limits and PHIs for the safe use of spiromesifen and chromafenozide in lettuce and perilla.

Pesticide Residues in Eggplant Fruit from Khartoum State, Sudan.

BACKGROUND: Eggplant is a popular food item in Sudan, however pesticides are heavily used. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the presence of pesticide residues in fresh eggplants in Khartoum State, Sudan. METHODS: Eggplant fruit samples from three different regions in Khartoum State (central vegetable market, east Nile farms, and west Nile farms) were analyzed for residues of commonly used pesticides. Pesticide residues were analyzed by gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry and results were expressed in µg/kg fruit. RESULTS: Out of the 11 active ingredients analyzed, residues were identified for four pesticides (imidacloprid, dimethoate, endosulfan (α and ß isomers) and 2, 4-D). Levels of omethoate, diazinon, malathion, chlorpyrifos, atrazine, and pendimethalin were below the detection limits. CONCLUSIONS: Residues of four insecticides out of the 11 analyzed (imidacloprid, dimethoate, endosulfan (α, ß isomers), and 2, 4-D) were detected in the current study. The health implications of these violative levels should be regularly observed along with strict enforcement of laws and regulations coupled with agricultural extension interventions. COMPETING INTERESTS: The authors declare no competing financial interests.