Quantification of myocardial blood flow using model based analysis of first-pass perfusion MRI: extraction fraction of Gd-DTPA varies with myocardial blood flow in human myocardium.

For the absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF), Patlak plot-derived K1 need to be converted to MBF by using the relation between the extraction fraction of gadolinium contrast agent and MBF. This study was conducted to determine the relation between extraction fraction of Gd-DTPA and MBF in human heart at rest and during stress. Thirty-four patients (19 men, mean age of 66.5 ± 11.0 years) with normal coronary arteries and no myocardial infarction were retrospectively evaluated. First-pass myocardial perfusion MRI during adenosine triphosphate stress and at rest was performed using a dual bolus approach to correct for saturation of the blood signal. Myocardial K1 was quantified by Patlak plot method. Mean MBF was determined from coronary sinus flow measured by phase contrast cine MRI and left ventricle mass measured by cine MRI. The extraction fraction of Gd-DTPA was calculated as the K1 divided by the mean MBF. The extraction fraction of Gd-DTPA was 0.46 ± 0.22 at rest and 0.32 ± 0.13 during stress (P < 0.001). The relationship between extraction fraction (E) and MBF in human myocardium can be approximated as E = 1 - exp(-(0.14 × MBF + 0.56)/MBF). The current results indicate that MBF can be accurately quantified by Patlak plot method of first-pass myocardial perfusion MRI by performing a correction of extraction fraction.

Diagnostic accuracy of 1.5-T unenhanced whole-heart coronary MR angiography performed with 32-channel cardiac coils: initial single-center experience.

PURPOSE: To compare the imaging time and image quality obtained with whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance (MR) angiography performed with five- and 32-channel coils in healthy subjects and determine the accuracy of MR angiography performed with 32-channel coils in the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved the study protocol, and all participants provided written informed consent. The authors studied 10 healthy subjects and 67 patients suspected of having CAD who were scheduled for coronary angiography. Unenhanced 1.5-T coronary MR angiography was performed with five- and 32-channel coils in healthy subjects and with 32-channel coils in patients. Clinically significant CAD was defined as a diameter reduction of at least 50% at coronary angiography. The sensitivity and specificity of coronary MR angiography were calculated. RESULTS: The mean imaging time was substantially reduced from 12.3 minutes ± 4.2 (standard deviation) with five-channel coils to 6.3 minutes ± 2.2 with 32-channel coils, with equivalent image quality scores. Acquisition of MR angiograms was completed in all 67 patients, with a mean imaging time of 6.2 minutes ± 2.8. The prevalence of CAD in the study population was 58% (39 of the 67 patients). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves as determined at vessel- and patient-based analyses were 0.91 and 0.90, respectively; the sensitivity and specificity at vessel-based analysis were 86% and 93%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Whole-heart coronary MR angiography performed at 1.5 T with 32-channel coils permits noninvasive detection of CAD with substantially reduced imaging time. This noninvasive approach can be an alternative to multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography for ruling out obstructive CAD in patients who have a contraindication to contrast material and in young subjects who are at higher risk from ionizing radiation. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.11101323/-/DC1.

Assessment of coronary artery disease using magnetic resonance coronary angiography: a national multicenter trial.

OBJECTIVES: This national multicenter study determined the diagnostic performance of 1.5-T whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND: Whole-heart coronary MRA using steady-state free precession allows noninvasive detection of CAD without the administration of contrast medium. However, the accuracy of this approach has not been determined in a multicenter trial. METHODS: Using a 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging unit, free-breathing steady-state free precession whole-heart coronary MRA images were acquired for 138 patients with suspected CAD at 7 hospitals. The accuracy of MRA for detecting a ≥ 50% reduction in diameter was determined using X-ray coronary angiography as the reference method. RESULTS: Acquisition of whole-heart coronary MRA images was performed in 127 (92%) of 138 patients with an average imaging time of 9.5 ± 3.5 min. The areas under the receiver-operator characteristic curve from MRA images according to vessel- and patient-based analyses were 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87 to 0.95) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81 to 0.93), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of MRA according to a patient-based analysis were 88% (49 of 56, 95% CI: 75% to 94%), 72% (51 of 71, 95% CI: 60% to 82%), 71% (49 of 69, 95% CI: 59% to 81%), 88% (51 of 58, 95% CI: 76% to 95%), and 79% (100 of 127, 95% CI: 72% to 86%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Non-contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary MRA at 1.5-T can noninvasively detect significant CAD with high sensitivity and moderate specificity. A negative predictive value of 88% indicates that whole-heart coronary MRA can rule out CAD.

Contrast-enhanced MR imaging for evaluation of coronary artery disease before elective repair of aortic aneurysm.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the accuracy of first-pass contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging during stress and delayed contrast-enhanced MR imaging in the detection of significant coronary artery disease in patients before elective repair of aortic aneurysm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. MR imaging was performed in 49 patients (42 men and seven women; mean age, 72.2 years; age range, 58-85 years) before the elective repair of atherosclerotic aortic aneurysms. Thirty-two patients had an abdominal aneurysm, 12 had a thoracic aneurysm, and five had a thoracoabdominal aneurysm. First-pass contrast-enhanced MR images were obtained with short-axis sections encompassing the entire left ventricular myocardium in the resting state and during pharmacologic stress. Inversion-recovery-prepared delayed contrast-enhanced MR images were obtained with breath holding to evaluate for the presence of infarction. All patients underwent coronary angiography within 2 weeks of MR imaging, and these findings were used as the standard of reference. The diagnostic results of first-pass contrast-enhanced MR imaging, delayed contrast-enhanced MR imaging, and a combination of both MR imaging methods in the detection of significant coronary artery disease were expressed as sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. RESULTS: Coronary angiography depicted a clinically significant stenosis (>70% luminal diameter narrowing) in the coronary artery in 34 of the 49 patients (69%). First-pass contrast-enhanced MR imaging depicted stress-induced hypoenhancement in 27 of those 34 patients (79%). Delayed myocardial enhancement was observed in 17 of the 34 patients (50%). The overall sensitivity of rest-stress first-pass contrast-enhanced MR imaging and delayed contrast-enhanced MR imaging combined in the prediction of at least one coronary artery with significant stenosis was 88% (30 of 34 patients). The specificity and accuracy of MR imaging were 87% (13 of 15 patients) and 88% (43 of 49 patients), respectively. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced MR imaging had an accuracy of 88% in the detection of significant coronary artery disease in patients with aortic aneurysm.

Contrast-enhanced high-resolution MRI of invasive breast cancer: correlation with histopathologic subtypes.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether contrast-enhanced MRI could aid in the identification of the histopathologic subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the contrast-enhanced MR images obtained in 62 women with invasive ductal carcinoma of no special type. The presence or absence of three distinct MRI findings-linear enhancement, a serrated border, and delayed rim enhancement-was evaluated. Classification and regression tree analyses were performed to construct the most efficient algorithm for predicting histopathologic subtype on the basis of dynamic MRI features. RESULTS: Histopathologic subtypes of the invasive ductal carcinomas were scirrhous carcinoma in 22 patients, solid tubular carcinoma in 14, and papillotubular carcinoma in 26. A lesion with a serrated border was observed in 28 (45.2%) of the 62 patients. Delayed rim enhancement was seen in 23 (37.1%) and linear enhancement in 20 (32.3%). Scirrhous carcinomas were closely associated with a serrated border (20/22 or 90.9%, p < 0.0001). Delayed rim enhancement was frequently observed in solid tubular carcinomas (12/14 or 85.7%, p < 0.0001) but was not typically seen in scirrhous carcinomas (1/22 or 4.5%, p < 0.0001). Linear enhancement showed relatively high prevalence in papillotubular carcinomas (13/26 or 50%) and low prevalence in solid tubular carcinomas (1/22 or 7%, p < 0.02). Histopathologic subtypes of invasive breast carcinoma of no special type could be correctly identified in 47 (75.8%) of 62 lesions using the diagnostic algorithm generated by the classification and regression tree analyses. CONCLUSION: MRI features showed a close relationship with histopathologic subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma of no special type. Contrast-enhanced MRI can be a noninvasive diagnostic tool for histopathologic subtypes of invasive breast cancer.

Prediction of regional functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction with low dose dobutamine stress cine MR imaging and contrast enhanced MR imaging.

PURPOSE: Previous studies demonstrated that low-dose dobutamine stress cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and delayed contrast-enhanced MRI can provide assessments of myocardial viability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the comparative diagnostic values of dobutamine cine MRI and delayed contrast-enhanced MRI for predicting functional recovery of myocardial contraction in patients with acute reperfused myocardial infarction. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary interventions were studied. All patients underwent steady-state cine MRI covering the entire left ventricle at rest and during low-dose dobutamine stress (10 micrograms/kg/min). Delayed contrast-enhanced MR images were acquired to determine transmural extent of hyperenhancement. Second cine MR images in the resting state were obtained 3 to 11 months after revascularization. RESULTS: On the first cine MR images in the resting state, 278 (20%) of 1380 segments demonstrated abnormal, regional contraction (systolic wall thickening < 40%). Of the 175 segments showing functional recovery on the following cine MRI, 156 (89%) segments were recognized as reversible by dobutamine cine MRI and 146 (83%) segments by delayed contrast-enhanced MRI. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of dobutamine stress cine MRI was 89%, 80%, and 86%, respectively. These values of contrast-enhanced MRI were 83%, 72%, and 79%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating curve (ROC) was 0.87 by dobutamine cine MRI and 0.78 by delayed contrast-enhanced MRI (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The current results using quantitative segmental analysis indicated that low-dose dobutamine stress cine MRI can predict recovery of myocardial contractility with significantly higher diagnostic performance in comparison with contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with myocardial infarction who underwent revascularization.

Noninfarcted myocardium: correlation between dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial MR imaging and quantitative coronary angiography.

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of first-pass contrast material-enhanced stress myocardial magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for depiction of myocardial ischemia in patients without myocardial infarction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First-pass contrast-enhanced MR images of the entire left ventricle were acquired in 104 patients at rest and during dipyridamole-induced stress by using an interleaved notched saturation technique. Coronary angiography was performed in all patients, and stress perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) was performed in 69 patients. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic accuracies of first-pass contrast-enhanced stress MR imaging and stress SPECT, with coronary angiography as the reference standard. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity of MR imaging for depicting at least one coronary artery with significant stenosis was 90% (69 of 77 patients). The sensitivities of MR imaging for depiction of single-, double-, and triple-vessel stenoses were 85% (33 of 39 patients), 96% (22 of 23 patients), and 100% (15 of 15 patients), respectively. The specificity of MR imaging for identification of patients with significant coronary artery stenoses was 85% (23 of 27 patients). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for detection of significant stenosis in individual coronary arteries were 0.888 (observer 1) and 0.911 (observer 2) for MR imaging and 0.707 (observer 1, P <.001) and 0.750 (observer 2, P <.001) for SPECT. CONCLUSION: In patients without myocardial infarction, stress enhancement at dynamic MR imaging correlates more closely with quantitative coronary angiography results than does stress enhancement at SPECT.

Evaluation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using fast steady-state cine MR imaging: comparison with left ventricular angiography.

Previous studies demonstrated that magnetic resonance (MR) imaging consistently underestimated angiographic measurements of left ventricular (LV) volumes. The purpose of this study was to determine whether MR imaging with steady-state free precession acquisition (SSFP) can provide improved accuracy and reproducibility in measuring cardiac function in comparison with fast spoiled gradient echo cine MR imaging (SPGR). Twenty patients with cardiovascular diseases who underwent breath-hold cine MR imaging within one week of LV angiography were studied. Two sets of breath-hold cine MR images were obtained, one with SSFP and another with SPGR. The LV volumes determined by two breath-hold cine MR sequences were compared with the results by LV angiography. SPGR cine MR imaging consistently underestimated angiographic LV volumes. The mean difference of LV end-diastolic volume was -22.5 +/- 14.8 ml (p < 0.001) for short-axis planes and -27.7 +/- 21.5 ml (p < 0.001) for long-axis planes. In contrast, LV volumes measured by the SSFP imaging showed a good agreement with the results by angiography. The mean difference of LV end-diastolic volume was -2.5 +/- 14.3 ml (p = N.S.) for short-axis planes and -10.9 +/- 15.1 ml (p < 0.01) for long-axis planes. Standard error of the estimation in measuring LV end-diastolic volume with the SSFP imaging was 3.9% for short-axis images and 4.9% for long-axis images. These values were 7.2% and 8.7% with the SPGR imaging. In conclusion, the SSFP acquisition can provide accurate and noninvasive assessments of LV volumes and ejection fraction within a reduced imaging time.