ABSTRACT
The patients' inhalation flow pattern is one of the significant determinants for clinical performance of inhalation therapy. However, the development of inhalation flow meters for various inhalation devices has been unable to keep up with the increasing number of newly launched inhalation devices. In the present study, we developed simple attachment orifices for the inhalation flow pattern monitoring system, which are suitable for all commercial inhalers, and investigated the efficacy of the system on the clinical inhalation instruction for patients co-prescribed dry powder inhaler (DPI) and soft mist inhaler (SMI). First, we constructed simple attachment orifices that were adjusted for 13 commercial inhalers, and examined the correlation between orifice and inhalation device. Second, the inhalation flow patterns (peak inspiratory flow rate, PIFR; inhalation duration time, DT) of patients prescribed a combination of DPI and SMI were monitored before and after inhalation instruction. The inhalation resistance of commercial inhalers are listed in the following order; Twincaps® > Handihaler® > Swinghaler® = Clickhaler® > Twisthaler® > Turbuhaler® > Jenuair® > Diskus® = Ellipta® > Diskhaler® > Breezhaler® > Respimat® = pMDI. The pressure drop via orifice was significantly correlated with that via the commercial inhaler. For the confirmation, all participants achieved the DPI criterion of PIFR. On the other hand, 4 participants (6 clinical visits) of 10 experimented participants could not achieve the essential criterion of DT (> 1.5 sec) for SMI, but all participants improved their duration time after inhalation instruction by pharmacists (P<0.05). In the present study, we successfully developed simple attachment orifice suitable for 13 commercial inhalation devices. These data suggested that our simple attachment orifices for the inhalation flow pattern monitoring system can detect patients with inadequate inhalation patterns via SMI.
Subject(s)
Asthma/drug therapy , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Dry Powder Inhalers/instrumentation , Administration, Inhalation , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Inhalation , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to reveal the relationship between human inspiratory flow patterns and the concomitant drops in pressure in different inhalation devices, and the influence of the devices on inhalation performance. As a model formulation for inhalers, a physically mixed dry powder composed of salbutamol sulfate and coarse lactose monohydrate was selected. The drops in pressure at 28.3 L/min of three inhalation devices, Single-type, Dual-type, and Reverse-type, was 1.0, 5.1, and 8.7 kPa, respectively. Measurements of human inspiratory patterns revealed that although the least resistant device (Single) had large inter- and intra-individual variation of peak flow rate (PFR), the coefficients of variation of PFR of the three devices were almost the same. In tests with a human inspiratory flow simulator in vitro, inhalation performance was higher, but the variation in inhalation performance in the range of human flow patterns was wider, for the more resistant device. To minimize the intra- and inter-individual variation in inhalation performance for the model formulation in this study, a formulation design that allows active pharmaceutical ingredient to detach from the carrier with a lower inhalation flow rate is needed.
Subject(s)
Dry Powder Inhalers/methods , Inhalation/physiology , Powders/chemistry , Administration, Inhalation , Adult , Albuterol/administration & dosage , Albuterol/chemistry , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Bronchodilator Agents/chemistry , Chemistry, Pharmaceutical/methods , Dry Powder Inhalers/instrumentation , Dry Powder Inhalers/standards , Female , Humans , Lactose/administration & dosage , Lactose/chemistry , Male , Particle Size , Powders/administration & dosage , Pressure , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To construct a simple simulator reproducing human inspiratory flow patterns and use it to evaluate the inhalation performance of active ingredient particle-carrier particle systems (physically mixed dry powders). METHODS: Inspiratory flow patterns were collected and analyzed using a flow recorder. The simulator was constructed using an airtight container, a valve, and a connecting tube. Several of the patterns reproduced by the simulator were compared with those recorded. In addition, the influence of inspiratory flow on the inhalation performance of physically mixed dry powders composed of salbutamol sulfate (SS) and coarse lactose monohydrate was investigated using a twin-stage liquid impinger (TSLI) equipped with the simulator. RESULTS: Human inspiratory flow patterns could be characterized by three parameters: inspiratory flow volume (area under the flow rate-time curve (AUC)), flow increase rate (FIR), and peak flow rate (PFR). The patterns could be reproduced using the simulator. Testing with the simulator in vitro revealed that PFR, but not FIR or AUC, greatly affected the inhalation performance of physically mixed dry powders. CONCLUSIONS: The simulator is simple to construct and can schematically reproduce human inspiratory flow patterns. Testing with a TSLI and the simulator is useful to evaluate dry powder formulations for clinical application.
