ABSTRACT
To analyse the outcome of transnasal endoscopic repair of CSF Rhinorrhea in a tertiary care centre. This is a retrospective study conducted on 81 patients who underwent CSF Rhinorrhea repair in a tertiary care hospital for a period of 11 years. Following confirmation of diagnosis using bio-chemical and radiological investigations, all patients underwent transnasal endoscopic repair of CSF Rhinorrhea using a multilayer graft. Patients were followed up for 6 months. The most common etiology in our study was spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea (60.49%) and subjects with BMI > 25.5 kg/m2 were more prone to it. Cribriform plate was found to be the most frequent site of leak in our study (58.02%), followed by fovea ethmoidalis (12.35%). Overall success rate was 96.30%. Transnasal endoscopic approach for cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea repair shows good success rate and also offers the advantages of better visualization and identification of site of leak, less complications, rapid postoperative recovery, and low recurrence rate. Transnasal endoscopic CSF Rhinorrhea repair has shown good results in terms of low recurrence rates and high patient satisfaction among other advantages. Hence this approach should be commonly used for CSF rhinorrhea repair by surgeons.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In India every year, a large number of pregnancies are unplanned resulting in unsafe abortion. This has tremendous implications both on health and survival of women. Usage of emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs) could be a solution provided the usage is as per guidelines and social issues do not cause objections. AIM: This study was done to assess the awareness and attitudes regarding ECPs. METHODS: Data were collected using self-administered questionnaire from the university students. RESULTS: Out of 449 students, 384(85.5 %) had heard about ECPs. The commonest source of information was television 299(77.9 %). Only 128(33.3 %) students knew that ECPs do not help in prevention of STDs. 209(54.4 %) participants knew the correct time frame for taking ECPs. 109(28.4 %) were unaware of its side effects. Only 149(33.2 %) had received reproductive health education (RHE) in the past. The awareness level of students about ECPs was moderate among 231(60.2 %) participants. Awareness was significantly more among males (p = 0.013), students with science background (p = 0.001) and those who had RHE previously (p = 0.043). 219(57 %) had average level of perception toward ECPs. 254(66.2 %) participants favored prescription before procuring ECPs from drug stores. 261(68 %) participants favored information about ECPs to be given in educational institutions, and a majority, 186(48.4 %), said they would recommend ECPs to their friends. Average-to-good perception about ECPs was seen in significantly greater proportion of females (p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: RHE is must at educational institutions so as to promote awareness and to remove misconceptions about ECPs among youth. This would help users in preventing unintended pregnancies and unsafe abortions.
