A large UK single-centre experience in the long-term safety and efficacy of Woven Endobridge in the treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms and risk factors associated with re-bleeding and re-treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Endovascular treatment of wide neck aneurysms remains complicated with a determined and continuous technological effort towards treatment options that can offer safer and efficacious outcomes. The Woven Endobridge device was introduced in 2010 and has become a mainstay endovascular treatment for wide neck and large intracranial aneurysms. A recent review of the Woven Endobridge Clinical Assessment of Intrasaccular Aneurysm Therapy (WEBCAST) and WEBCAST2 trials and the five-year follow-up of patients was published. Our aim is to demonstrate real-life experience of aneurysms and patients treated with Woven Endobridge from a large high-volume specialist centre. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients treated with Woven Endobridge from March 2013 to March 2018. Primary efficacy outcomes were defined as per Raymond-Roy Occlusion Criteria (RROC) resulting in long-term complete occlusion (RROC1) and adequate occlusion (RROC1 and RROC2). Primary Safety outcomes were defined as procedure-related morbidity, rate of re-bleeding and rate of re-treatment. RESULTS: Seventy-nine aneurysms were treated during the five-year period. Adequate aneurysm occlusion (RROC1 and RROC2) achieved was 81%. Retreatment was required in 18% of patients (14/79). Greater retreatment rate was demonstrated in partially thrombosed aneurysms, aneurysms with larger neck and dome diameter and dome heights. CONCLUSION: Woven Endobridge treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms offers a safe and efficacious outcome. This large UK single-centre experience demonstrates congruity with recent five-year outcomes of WEBCAST and WEBCAST2 trials.

Large Single-Center Experience with Short-Term Follow-up of Neqstent-Assisted Coiling.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms has historically proved difficult with variable outcomes. Different endovascular techniques such as balloon-assisted coiling, stent-assisted coiling, or intrasaccular devices provide a varied range of efficacy and safety. Neqstent-assisted coiling is a new device and technique that aim to provide a maximum of both. We analyzed the early clinical and radiologic outcomes after the use of this new technique and device in our practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with the Neqstent. The primary radiologic outcomes were quantified on DSA, CTA, or MRA using the modified Raymond-Roy criteria. The outcomes were defined as immediate complete occlusion (modified Raymond-Roy criteria 1) and complete (modified Raymond-Roy criteria 1) and adequate occlusion (modified Raymond-Roy criteria 1 and modified Raymond-Roy criteria 2) at 6 months posttreatment. The primary safety outcome was the rate of device-related adverse events. Secondary safety outcomes included time to discharge and change in the mRS score at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty patients were treated with the Neqstent from November 2020 to January 2023. Nine had unruptured aneurysms, and 11 were patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage due to ruptured aneurysms. Eighteen of 20 aneurysms (90%) treated demonstrated complete occlusion (modified Raymond-Roy criteria 1) on immediate postembolization angiograms. Sixteen of 17 aneurysms treated (94.1%) remained adequately occluded on 6-month follow-up (modified Raymond-Roy criteria 1 and modified Raymond-Roy criteria 2). Immediate postoperative complications occurred in 2 patients; only 1 patient had residual neurologic deficits at 6 months (mRS = 2). CONCLUSIONS: Management of large, wide-neck aneurysms remains difficult, with high rates of recurrence and complications. The use of the Neqstent shows promising short-term results for the treatment of complex wide-neck aneurysms. Initial complication rates for our cohort were relatively high. However, this result is likely related to the initial learning experience of device deployment and the use of antiplatelets.

Outcome study of the Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device (second version) in unruptured (and ruptured) aneurysms (PEDVU(R) study).

BACKGROUND: The Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device (PEDV) is the fourth-generation pipeline flow diverter for intracranial aneurysm treatment. There are no outcome studies for the second PEDV version. We aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy outcomes. Primary and secondary objectives were to determine outcomes for unruptured and ruptured cohorts, respectively. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective and prospective study, we analyzed outcome data from eight centers using core laboratory assessments. We determined 30-day and ≥3-month mortality and morbidity rates, and 6- and 18-month radiographic aneurysm occlusion rates for procedures performed during the period July 2021-March 2023. RESULTS: We included 121 consecutive patients with 131 aneurysms. The adequate occlusion rate for the unruptured cohort at short-term and medium-term follow up, and also for the ruptured cohort at short-term follow up, was >90%. Two aneurysms (1.5%) underwent retreatment. When mortality attributed to a palliative case in the unruptured cohort, or subarachnoid hemorrhage in the ruptured cohort, was excluded then the overall major adverse event rate in respective cohorts was 7.5% and 23.5%, with 0% mortality rates for each. When all event causes were included on an intention-to-treat basis, the major adverse event rates in respective cohorts were 8.3% and 40.9%, with 0.9% and 22.7% mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: For unruptured aneurysm treatment, the second PEDV version appears to have a superior efficacy and similar safety profile to previous-generation PEDs. These are acceptable outcomes in this pragmatic and non-industry-sponsored study. Analysis of ruptured aneurysm outcomes is limited by cohort size. Further prospective studies, particularly for ruptured aneurysms, are needed.

A review and journey in intrasaccular treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

The invested effort and collaboration of clinicians and medical device companies to improve occlusion rates and clinical outcomes for patients with intracranial aneurysms treated via less invasive endovascular means led to the development of the concept of intrasaccular devices. Intrasaccular devices were introduced to offer simple treatment options, offering easier navigation through difficult anatomy, simpler and quicker deployment into large and wide-neck aneurysms. Additionally, they offer easier sizing, whilst offering a wide range of options suitable for aneurysms of different sizes. The concept of most intrasaccular devices is to occupy the aneurysm neck, however offering better stability than simple coiling, therefore increasing the chance of long-term aneurysm occlusion. This is achieved without a sizable metal content within the parent vessel, contrary to flow diverters, theoretically reducing the risk of thromboembolic events. This review aims to discuss the history and latest developments of intrasaccular intracranial devices, which offer an exciting and potentially successful option for treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms.