Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 21(10): 4637-4645, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35212136

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Warts are common in children and can be difficult to treat. Many treatments for warts are destructive and painful in contrast to intralesional immunotherapy using different types of antigens. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intralesional purified protein derivative (PPD) versus intralesional zinc sulfate 2% in the treatment of pediatric warts. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial included 120 children with multiple warts divided into two equal groups. Group Ⅰ received intralesional 10 IU (0.1 ml) of PPD, group Ⅱ received intralesional zinc sulfate 2% in the largest wart every 2 weeks till improvement or for a maximum five treatment sessions. The follow-up period was 6 months after the last treatment session. RESULTS: The overall response was equal in both groups (81.7%), but the response of the injected wart was higher in the zinc sulfate group (93.4%) versus PPD group (83.3%) with no significant difference. The highest cure rates were after the 5th session in the PPD group and the 1st session in the zinc sulfate group with slightly lower numbers of sessions needed for cure in the zinc sulfate group (3 sessions) versus the PPD group (4 sessions). The zinc sulfate group showed statistically significant higher rates of complications (pain, inflammation, necrosis, and scar) than PPD group. The zinc sulfate group showed non-significant higher rates of recurrence during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Both intralesional PPD and zinc sulfate 2% are effective in pediatric warts with higher safety profile of PPD.


Subject(s)
Warts , Zinc Sulfate , Child , Humans , Zinc Sulfate/adverse effects , Sulfates/therapeutic use , Zinc , Injections, Intralesional , Warts/therapy , Treatment Outcome
2.
Arch Environ Occup Health ; 73(1): 42-47, 2018 Jan 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28157439

ABSTRACT

This cross-sectional study was carried out in Mansoura, Egypt to assess the prevalence of occupational dermatoses and their possible risk factors on a convenience sample of car mechanics. Sociodemographic and occupational data were collected, and clinical examination was done. Prevalence of skin diseases was 45.4% and that of exclusively occupational skin diseases was 9.2%. Irritant contact dermatitis, eczema, and tar/oil acne were the most common types (4.6%, 3.1%, 3.1%, respectively). The logistic regression analysis revealed that the risk of occupational dermatoses increased significantly with lack of use of personal protective equipment, longer duration of work, and presence of workplace chemicals (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI] were 7.2 [2.7, 19.0], 4.3 [1.7, 10.9], and 3.7 [1.3, 10.5], respectively). Health education and safety measures are essential for prevention and control of hazardous workplace practices and exposure.


Subject(s)
Mechanics , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure , Skin Diseases/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Automobiles , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Egypt/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Skin Diseases/etiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...