Telerehabilitation acceptance among patients during Circuit Breaker period: A retrospective study.

Background and objectives: During the COVID-19 pandemic, telerehabilitation (TR) was viewed as an ideal alternative to minimize infection risks with in-person rehabilitation. However, TR acceptability remains unclear as it is an unfamiliar mode of interaction for most patients. We aim to retrospectively: (i) review the uptake rate of TR among patients, and (ii) explore their perceived barriers and facilitators of the service. Design: A cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted among eligible patients who were offered TR. Research data was extracted from medical records. Additionally, an anonymous patient satisfaction survey was conducted among the successfully enrolled patients, and the feedback was extracted from the form.gov.sg server. Results: 24·2% of the 314 eligible patients were successfully enrolled into TR. Preference for in-person rehabilitation was the top reason cited for declining the service. Among the 157 patients who declined the service, 38·2% of them preferred in-person rehabilitation over TR. Conclusions: A low uptake of TR services was demonstrated, with preference for in-person rehabilitation being the majority cited reason for decline. Reconciling the differences in patients' perceptions between in-person rehabilitation and TR may improve uptake rates.

Motor imagery in high-functioning individuals with chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that motor imagery performance (MIP) is impaired in conditions that have a component of movement dysfunction. However, MIP has not been investigated in people with chronic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency who experience limited disability and function at high levels. HYPOTHESIS: This study had three objectives: (1) to assess implicit MIP in individuals with a chronic ACL deficient (ACLD) knee compared with healthy controls (i.e., intact anterior cruciate ligament); (2) to determine if the location of ACL deficiency affects MIP (dominant versus non-dominant leg); and (3) to determine if impairment in MIP is specific to the side (injured versus non-injured) of ACL deficiency. METHODS: Forty-five participants with chronic ACLD knee and 44 healthy controls completed a left/right judgement task of pictured knees using the "Recognise" app to evaluate implicit MIP. Accuracy and reaction time of judgements were compared between groups. Additionally, within the chronic ACLD knee group, we made comparisons between the dominant ACLD knee and non-dominant ACLD knee subgroups and between the injured knee and the non-injured knee of the ACLD group. RESULTS: There were no differences in implicit MIP between the ACLD knee and the control group, the non-injured knee versus injured knee of the ACLD knee group, or the dominant ACLD knee versus non-dominant ACLD knee subgroups. CONCLUSION: Implicit MIP is not disrupted in high functioning individuals with chronic ACLD knee.

Side-to-Side Differences in Varus Thrust and Knee Abduction Moment in High-Functioning Individuals With Chronic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that frontal plane knee joint motion plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of knee osteoarthritis, yet investigation of individuals with chronic anterior cruciate ligament-deficient (ACLD) knees remains sparse. PURPOSE: To investigate (1) if individuals with chronic ACLD knees demonstrate higher biomechanical measures of medial knee load as compared with their anterior cruciate ligament-intact (ACLI) knees, (2) if differences in static knee alignment of the ACLD knee will demonstrate a difference in the magnitude of biomechanical measures of medial knee load when compared with the ACLI knee, and (3) the side-to-side concordance of varus thrust among individuals with chronic ACLD knees. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Participants were sourced from a metropolitan orthopaedic surgeon group. Those who met the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate underwent a 3-dimensional gait analysis assessment to measure knee adduction moment (KAM), knee flexion moment (KFM), KAM peaks, KAM impulse, and varus thrust. Frontal plane knee static alignment was measured with a digital inclinometer fixed to medical calipers. The participants were divided according to their static knee alignment (neutral, varus, and valgus) for subgroup analysis. Peak knee angular velocity and frontal plane knee angle were used to establish if a participant was walking with a knee thrust. An individual was deemed to have knee thrust during gait if the largest frontal plane knee movement coincided with the peak knee angular velocity that occurred within the first 30% of stance phase. RESULTS: Forty-five participants were recruited. The mean (SD) time from injury was 34.5 (55.6) months. ACLD knees did not demonstrate higher mean KAM and KFM ( P > .5) or early-stance peak KAM ( P = .3-.8) and KAM impulse ( P = .3-.9) as compared with ACLI knees as a whole group or when the varus, neutral, and valgus alignment subgroups were investigated separately. Twenty-three percent (n = 9) of the participants had a varus thrust at the ACLD or ACLI knee, 44% (n = 4) had a varus thrust at the ACLD knee, and 22% (n = 2) had varus thrust at both knees. CONCLUSION: There were no side-to-side differences in mean KAM and KFM and early-stance peak KAM and KAM impulse among high-functioning individuals with chronic unilateral ACLD knees. There was a low prevalence of varus thrust among high-functioning individuals with chronic unilateral ACLD knees.

The development and validation of a custom built device for assessing frontal knee joint laxity.

INTRODUCTION: This study reports the development and validation of a quantitative technique of assessing frontal knee joint laxity through a custom built device named KLICP. The objectives of this study were to determine: (i) the intra- and inter-rater reliability and (ii) the validity of the device when compared to real time ultrasound. METHODS: Twenty-five participants had their frontal knee joint laxity assessed by the KLICP, by manual varus/valgus tests and by ultrasound. Two raters independently assessed laxity manually by three repeated measurements, repeated at least 48h later. Results were validated by comparing them to the medial and lateral joint space opening measured by the ultrasound. Intraclass correlation coefficients and standard error of measurement reliability were calculated. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the correlation between the KLICP and the joint space. RESULTS: Intra-rater reliability (intra-session) for each rater was good on both sessions (0.91-0.98), intra-rater reliability (inter-sessions) was moderate to good (0.62-0.87), and inter-rater reliability (intra-session) was good (0.75-0.80). There is low agreement for intra-rater (inter-session) and for inter-rater (intra-session) reliability. The KLICP measurement has a significant positive fair to moderate correlation to the ultrasound measurement at the left (r: 0.61, p: 0.01) and right (r: 0.48, p: 0.02) knee in the valgus direction and at the left (r: 0.51, p: 0.01) and right (r: 0.39, p: 0.05) knee in the varus direction. There is low agreement between the KLICP and the RTU. CONCLUSIONS: Reliability and agreement was good only when measured for intra-rater, within session.

Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic gait deviations in individuals with chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Altered joint motion that occurs in people with an anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee is proposed to play a role in the initiation of knee osteoarthritis, however, the exact mechanism is poorly understood. Although several studies have investigated gait deviations in individuals with chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee in the frontal and transverse planes, no systematic review has summarized the kinematic and kinetic deviations in these two planes. METHODS: We searched five electronic databases from inception to 14th October 2013, with key words related to anterior cruciate ligament, biomechanics and gait, and limited to human studies only. Two independent reviewers assessed eligibility based on predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria and methodological quality was evaluated using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statement checklist. FINDINGS: We identified 16 studies, totaling 183 subjects with anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee and 211 healthy subjects. Due to the variability in reported outcomes, we could only perform meta-analysis for 13 sagittal plane outcomes. The only significant finding from our meta-analysis showed that individuals with anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee demonstrated a significantly greater external hip flexor angular impulse compared to control (P=0.03). INTERPRETATION: No consensus about what constitutes a typical walking pattern in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee can be made, nor can conclusions be derived to explain if gait deviations in the frontal and transverse plane contributed to the development of the knee osteoarthritis among this population.