Patient dose in angiographic interventional procedures: A multicentre study in Italy.

PURPOSE: The Council Directive 2013/59/EURATOM considers interventional radiology to be a special practice involving high doses of radiation and requiring strict monitoring to ensure the best quality assurance programs. This work reports the early experience of managing dose data from patients undergoing angiography in a multicentre study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was based on a survey of about 15,200 sample procedures performed in 21 Italian hospitals centres involved on a voluntary basis. The survey concerned the collection of data related to different interventional radiology procedures: interventional cardiology, radiology, neuroradiology, vascular surgery, urology, endoscopy and pain therapy from a C-Arm and fixed units. The analysis included 11 types of procedures and for each procedure, air-kerma, kerma-area product and fluoroscopy time were collected. RESULTS: The duration and dose values of fluoroscopic exposure for each procedure is strongly dependent on individual clinical circumstances including the complexity of the procedure; the observed distribution of patient doses was very wide, even for a specified protocol. The median values of the parameters were compared with the diagnostic reference levels (DRL) proposed for some procedures in Italy (ISTISAN) or internationally. This work proposes local DRL values for three procedures. CONCLUSION: This first data collection serves to take stock of the situation on patient's dosimetry in several sectors and is the starting point for obtaining and updating DRL recalling that these levels are dependent on experience and technology available.

Radiation dose during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR): upgrade of an angiographic system from standard to Eco mode.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the radiation dose reduction during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) after the reconfiguration of a Philips AlluraXper FD20 X-ray system. METHODS: Between 2013 and 2015, we implemented a low-dose protocol (Eco dose) increasing the filtration with 1 mm of Al and 0.1 of Cu on both fluoroscopy and fluorography and halving the frames per second in fluoroscopy. The switch was complemented by hybrid operating room staff education and training in radiation protection. We compared two samples of 50 patients treated before the switch (normal dose) with 50 patients treated after the switch (Eco dose). Procedures were categorized into two different grades of complexity, standard and complex, intended as fenestrated/chimney/snorkel and EVAR plus additional embolization to prevent endoleak type II. We evaluated patient demographics, Air Kerma (AK), dose area product (DAP), and procedural data (fluoroscopy time, number of fluorographies, and iodinated contrast). Staff radiation dose was measured with film badge dosimeter on C-arm. RESULTS: The Eco-dose protocol witnessed a DAP reduction of 53% in standard EVARs and of 57% in complex EVARs and an AK reduction of 45% in standard and 57% in complex EVAR. The image quality in 2016 was perceived acceptable, as proven by the fact that fluoroscopy time, number of fluorographies, and contrast medium volumes did not have to be increased. We achieved a reduction in staff dose of 25.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Optimized angiographic system setting significantly reduced the radiation dose both to the patients and to the staff assuring safe EVAR procedures.

Survey of the interventional cardiology procedures in Italy.

Interventional cardiology procedures are increasing because they offer many advantages to patients compared with other techniques: therefore the Italian National Institution for Insurance against Accidents at Work decided to start a survey for monitoring the state-of-the-art regarding the professionals involved in those procedures. The survey covered six cardiology and medical physics Italian departments. Each centre was asked to record 10 examinations for five types of procedures: coronary angiography (CA), electrophysiology studies (ES), pacemaker implantation (PI), percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and radiofrequency catheter ablation (RA). For each examination all the centres were requested to fill in a questionnaire containing information regarding the operator performing the examination, the patient and the procedure. A total of 290 examinations were recorded: 103 CA, 14 ES, 68 PI, 79 PTCA and 26 RA. As occupational doses are strongly related to patient doses, both patients and operators radiation dose data are reported. Ratios of maximum to minimum mean patient doses across the hospitals surveyed were 2.0, 3.9, 7.0, 1.8 and 1.4 for CA, ES, PI, PTCA and RA, respectively. The calculated rounded mean dose-area product values across all participating hospitals were comparable with other values reported in the literature. In general, specific radiation protection tools were used by all operators performing different procedures in all hospitals. A major issue in this survey was the absence of information about correlation between staff and patient doses in a single procedure: future studies could be more aimed to prospective goals where occupational exposures per procedure are monitored specifically.

[Patient dose evaluation and optimization of uropoietic multiphasic multislice CT examination].

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to optimize acquisition data during multislice multiphasic CT examination of the renal excretory system in order to reduce patient effective dose without deterioration of the imaging quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With the aid of two dedicated software programmes we evaluated the patient effective dose during both multislice multiphasic CT examination of the renal excretory system and excretory urography. With the CT acquisition protocol, images of a test object (Helical CT phantom, CIRS) were examined by two expert radiologists to assess the number of visible inserted test images. Other scans of the test object were then obtained utilizing decreased tube current intensity; among these that with minor information loss was identified. Patient effective dose was measured utilizing correspondent acquisition data. RESULTS: Patient effective dose during multiphasic multislice CT examination before optimization (280 mA tube current intensity) was 22.9 mSv for males and 31.1 mSv for females; after optimization it was 19.6 mSv and 26.7 mSv, respectively, with a 14% decrease. Patient effective dose during CT direct phase before optimization was 8.9 mSv for males and 12.8 mSv for females, after optimization 7.6 mSv and 11 mSv with a 15% decrease. The absorbed dose for males is lower because the females gonads are completely included in the primary CT beam, whereas the testicles are hit by diffuse radiation only. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: During CT direct phase the patient absorbed dose is 1.45 for males and 1.9 for females (1.2 and 1.6 respectively after optimization) higher than that absorbed during intravenous pyelography; the absorbed dose of a complete multiphasic CT examination is 3.7 for males and 4.6 for females (3.2 and 3.9 respectively after optimization) higher than that absorbed during intravenous pyelography. Such dosimetric data may be justified by diagnostic advantages in stone assessment, especially in males, and by the fact that multislice CT may unify different diagnostic tools such as intravenous pyelography, axial CT and angiography, thereby simplifying the entire diagnostic protocol. As far as exposure is concerned radiologists should follow the optimizing principle referred to each clinical query, bearing in mind that diagnostic accuracy is more important than the simple iconographic aspect.