Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Cancer Res ; 24(17): 4297-4308, 2018 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29764854

ABSTRACT

Purpose: c-KIT overexpression is well recognized in cancers such as gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), small cell lung cancer (SCLC), melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Treatment with the small-molecule inhibitors imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib resulted in resistance (c-KIT mutant tumors) or limited activity (c-KIT wild-type tumors). We selected an anti-c-KIT ADC approach to evaluate the anticancer activity in multiple disease models.Experimental Design: A humanized anti-c-KIT antibody LMJ729 was conjugated to the microtubule destabilizing maytansinoid, DM1, via a noncleavable linker (SMCC). The activity of the resulting ADC, LOP628, was evaluated in vitro against GIST, SCLC, and AML models and in vivo against GIST and SCLC models.Results: LOP628 exhibited potent antiproliferative activity on c-KIT-positive cell lines, whereas LMJ729 displayed little to no effect. At exposures predicted to be clinically achievable, LOP628 demonstrated single administration regressions or stasis in GIST and SCLC xenograft models in mice. LOP628 also displayed superior efficacy in an imatinib-resistant GIST model. Further, LOP628 was well tolerated in monkeys with an adequate therapeutic index several fold above efficacious exposures. Safety findings were consistent with the pharmacodynamic effect of neutropenia due to c-KIT-directed targeting. Additional toxicities were considered off-target and were consistent with DM1, such as effects in the liver and hematopoietic/lymphatic system.Conclusions: The preclinical findings suggest that the c-KIT-directed ADC may be a promising therapeutic for the treatment of mutant and wild-type c-KIT-positive cancers and supported the clinical evaluation of LOP628 in GIST, AML, and SCLC patients. Clin Cancer Res; 24(17); 4297-308. ©2018 AACR.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects , Immunoconjugates/pharmacology , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit/genetics , Animals , Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic/pharmacology , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/immunology , Heterografts , Humans , Imatinib Mesylate/pharmacology , Immunoconjugates/immunology , Mice , Mutation , Neoplasms/classification , Neoplasms/immunology , Neoplasms/pathology , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit/immunology
2.
J Biomol Screen ; 11(7): 792-806, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17035625

ABSTRACT

Chk1 is a key regulator of the S and G2/M checkpoints and is activated following DNA damage by agents such as the topoisomerase I inhibitor camptothecin (CPT). It has been proposed that Chk1 inhibitors used in combination with such a DNA damaging agent to treat tumors would potentiate cytotoxicity and increase the therapeutic index, particularly in tumors lacking functional p53. The aim of this study was to determine whether gene expression analysis could be used to inform lead optimization of a novel series of Chk1 inhibitors. The candidate small-molecule Chk1 inhibitors were used in combination with CPT to identify potential markers of functional Chk1 inhibition, as well as resulting cell cycle progression, using cDNA-based microarrays. Differential expression of several of these putative marker genes was further validated by RT-PCR for use as a medium-throughput assay. In the presence of DNA damage, Chk1 inhibitors altered CPT-dependent effects on the expression of cell cycle and DNA repair genes in a manner consistent with a Chk1-specific mechanism of action. Furthermore, differential expression of selected marker genes, cyclin E2, EGR1, and DDIT3, was dose dependent for Chk1 inhibition. RT-PCR results for these genes following treatment with a panel of Chk1 inhibitors showed a strong correlation between marker gene response and the ability of each compound to abrogate cell cycle arrest in situ following CPT-induced DNA damage. These results demonstrate the utility of global expression analysis to identify surrogate markers, providing an alternative method for rapid compound characterization to support advancement decisions in early drug discovery.


Subject(s)
Cell Cycle/drug effects , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Protein Kinases/metabolism , Transcription, Genetic/drug effects , Biomarkers/analysis , Camptothecin/pharmacology , Cell Cycle/genetics , Checkpoint Kinase 1 , DNA Damage/genetics , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/chemistry , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...