Phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with previously untreated extensive stage small cell lung cancer: Southwest Oncology Group Study 9718.

BACKGROUND: This phase II study (S9718) evaluated the antineoplastic activity and tolerability of the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin in previously untreated patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). METHODS: Chemonaive patients with ES-SCLC, received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 mg/m IV over 30 to 60 minutes on day 1. Treatments were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles. RESULTS: A total of 88 patients were enrolled in the study; seven patients were not eligible and one did not receive treatment; 80 patients were fully assessable for survival, response, and toxicity. Objective response was observed in 42 patients (53%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 41%-64%) with two patients (3%; 95% CI: 0%-8%) achieving a complete response. Median PFS was 5 months (CI, 4.2-5.9 months), and median overall survival was 8.8 months (95% CI: 7.8-9.5 months). The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 27.5% (95% CI: 17.7%-37.3%) and 4% (95% CI: 0%-8%), respectively. The most common toxicity was neutropenia. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was noted in 17 (21%) and 17 (21%) patients, respectively. Two patients developed febrile neutropenia, with subsequent full recovery. Twenty-one patients (23%) developed grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was seen in only one patient. The most common nonhematologic toxicities included grade 3 and 4 vomiting in 12 (21%) patients and fatigue in nine (10%) patients. Two patients (3%) died of respiratory infections while on treatment. CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is an active and reasonably well tolerated regimen for the treatment of ES-SCLC. It does not appear to offer any compelling advantages over other commonly used two drug regimens in this disease.

Gemcitabine in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy: a phase II California cancer consortium trial.

A phase II trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with platinum-containing regimens and prospectively categorized for platinum response status. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 given intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The status of p53 in pretreatment tumor tissue was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Sixty-one patients who progressed or recurred following platinum-based therapy were enrolled, 26 platinum-sensitive and 35 platinum-refractory. A median of 4 treatment courses (range, 2-7 courses) was delivered. Of the 55 patients assessable for response, there was 1 confirmed complete response and 3 with a confirmed partial response for an overall response proportion of 7%. Twenty-one patients had stable disease while 28 progressed and 2 patients had an unconfirmed partial response. Three of the responders (2 confirmed, 1 unconfirmed) were platinum-refractory. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival for all patients were 4.1 months and 8.6 months, respectively. Median PFS and overall survival for the platinum-sensitive and platinum-refractory cohorts were 5.4 months versus 3.1 months, and 11.9 months versus 7.1 months, respectively. Toxicity was principally hematologic with grade 3/4 neutropenia in 21% and grade 4 platelets in 8%. There were no treatment-related deaths. Twenty-four of 33 patients (73%) had p53-positive tumors. Although no significant association between platinum sensitivity and p53 status was seen, patients with platinum-sensitive disease and negative p53 by IHC had a trend toward longer survival compared to those with platinum-refractory disease and/or p53 positivity (P = 0.06). We concluded that salvage gemcitabine in this dose and schedule is safe and tolerable in previously platinum-treated patients with NSCLC.

Phase I/II trial of gemcitabine plus docetaxel in advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

INTRODUCTION: The poor prognosis of non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as well as the significant toxicity from many conventional cytotoxic regimens warrants the investigation of combinations of new active agents for treatment. This is a phase I-II (dose-finding, efficacy, and toxicity) study of docetaxel + gemcitabine in patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC without prior systemic therapy. PATIENTS were treated in cohorts of 3 with alternating increasing doses of docetaxel and gemcitabine at each level. PATIENTS: Fifty patients were entered, of which 49 were eligible including 28 males and 21 females; 15 stage IIIB and 34 stage IV; median age 57 yrs (35-74). RESULTS: The Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) was docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) day 1 and gemcitabine 750 mg/m(2) d1 & 8, every 21 days. The overall response rate is 20%. Eight patients are not formally assessable for response due to early discontinuation or loss to follow-up and are considered to have progressive disease. The median time to progression (TTP) is 3.5 months (1-25), with 11 pts with at least 7 months TTP. There were 10 pts (20%) with a partial response (PR); 18 (37%) maintained stable disease; 21 (43%) had progressive disease (PD) or were not assessable. TOXICITY: Forty-nine patients are evaluable for assessment for toxicity: Grade (Gr) 3/4 toxicity was documented thus: 14 with neutropenia, 1 with anemia, 1 with nausea, 2 liver function, 2 dyspnea, 2 fatigue, 1 allergy, 1 neurologic. CONCLUSION: This regimen is well tolerated and results in phase I-II testing in this patient population warrant further consideration of the study of docetaxel + gemcitabine for advanced NSCLC.

Phase 2 study of cryptophycin 52 (LY355703) in patients previously treated with platinum based chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cryptophycin 52 is a novel antitubulin drug with in vitro and in vivo activity in non-small cell lung cancer. Based upon promising Phase 1 data, a multicenter trial was performed to evaluate the drug in previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients with Stage IIIb (pleural effusion) or Stage IV NSCLC and performance status 0-1 with adequate organ function who had received at least one and no more than two prior chemotherapy regimens (one of which must have contained a platinum agent) were eligible. Cryptophycin 52 was administered at a dose of 1.5 mg/m(2) day 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Patients were reassessed every two cycles. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were enrolled of whom 25 are evaluable for toxicity and response. There were no responders, toxicity was predominantly neurologic in the form of peripheral neuropathy and constipation. After the first 12 patients were enrolled, the dose was lowered to 1.125 mg/m(2) day 1 and 8. Toxicity was substantially reduced with this maneuver. Median survival was 4.1 months. The median number of cycles was two, however ten patients received four or more courses of therapy. CONCLUSION: Cryptophycin 52 failed to produce measurable responses utilizing this schedule. In 40% of patients there was evidence of disease stabilization. Toxicity at 1.5 mg/m(2) was unacceptable. Since activity and toxicity may be dose and schedule dependent, other schedules of cryptophycin 52 should be considered.

Phase II trial of irinotecan, paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with previously untreated Stage IIIB/IV nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This Phase II multicenter, open-label, single-arm study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a three-drug combination of irinotecan (CPT-11), paclitaxel, and carboplatin in advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients received repeated 21-day cycles at starting doses of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) administered over 3 hours, followed by carboplatin AUC of 5 over 30 minutes and CPT-11 at a starting dose level of 100 mg/m(2) over 90 minutes, all given on the first day of each cycle. Patients were evaluated for objective tumor response, time to tumor progression (TTP), survival, and safety. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled. Baseline patient characteristics included: median age 58 years (range, 32-79); 23 males and 17 females; performance status of 0 (21 patients), 1 (18 patients), or 2 (1 patient); and Stage IIIB (10 patients) and Stage IV (30 patients) disease. A median of six cycles (range, one to eight) were administered. Grade 3-4 toxicities observed in >/= 10% of the patients included neutropenia (78%), asthenia (20%), diarrhea (20%), nausea (18%), vomiting (13%), anemia (10%), and dyspnea (10%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in eight patients (20%), with one death due to neutropenic sepsis. Twelve of 38 evaluable patients had confirmed tumor responses (32%), while 21 (55%) had stable disease (including 12 patients [32%] with minor responses). Only 13% had disease progression at their initial tumor assessment. The median TTP and survival were 5.3 months (range, 0.03-6.2 months) and 12.5 months (range 0.3-28.6+ months), respectively. The one and two year survival probabilities were 0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.73) and 0.21 (95% CI, 0.0-0.67), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of CPT-11, paclitaxel, and carboplatin can be safely administered and is active in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Based on the favorable survival outcome, this regimen is undergoing evaluation in prospective randomized trials.

Chemotherapy-induced activation of hemostasis: effect of a low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin sodium) on plasma markers of hemostatic activation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of standard chemotherapeutic regimens on the hemostatic profile of patients with breast and lung carcinoma; and to evaluate the effect of a single dose of a low molecular weight (LMW) heparin, dalteparin sodium, administered prior to the chemotherapy on markers of hemostatic activation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 11 patients with breast cancer and 10 patients with lung cancer receiving systemic chemotherapy were studied. 10 breast cancer patients and 9 lung cancer patients completed at least 1 cycle of treatment and had all hemostatic studies. Patients had a complete hemostatic and prothrombotic profile performed at study initiation. Markers of hemostatic activation consisting of immunoassays for thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) complex and D-dimer were measured in plasma samples obtained prior to chemotherapy and at 1, 24 and 48 h after treatment. A 2500 U dose of dalteparin was given prior to the 2nd cycle of chemotherapy; 5000 U of dalteparin was given prior to the 4th treatment cycle. RESULTS: Chemotherapy resulted in statistically significant increases in TAT and D-dimer for the 1, 24 and 48 h plasma samples in both the breast and lung cancer patients for all cycles of chemotherapy given without LMW heparin. There were statistically significant increases in basal thrombin generation over the 4 cycles of treatment which was unrelated to active cancer. Both pretreatment doses of dalteparin effectively prevented increases in the markers of hemostatic activation. However, in the lung cancer patients, who had significantly increased basal thrombin generation, the 5000 U dose dalteparin was more effective. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy results in significant hemostatic activation in patients with breast and lung cancer. The effect of treatment appears to be cumulative. A single dose of LMW heparin administered prior to therapy can suppress hemostatic activation.