Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25
Filter
1.
J Bone Miner Metab ; 33(1): 61-72, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24714934

ABSTRACT

This study examined whether the global clinical data for bazedoxifene could be extrapolated to a Japanese population by evaluating the results of a phase 2 study in postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis as compared to those of a pivotal, phase 3 study. The efficacy of bazedoxifene 20 and 40 mg versus placebo on lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers, lipid profile, incidence of fractures, and safety parameters was compared between the Japanese phase 2 study (N = 429) and the global phase 3 study (N = 7,492) during a 2-year period. In the primary population for assessment of bridging, differences in the mean percent change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD at 2 years relative to placebo were greater for women treated with bazedoxifene 20 and 40 mg in the phase 2 study than in the phase 3 study. BMD changes in the bazedoxifene groups were confirmed to be similar between the phase 2 study population and a subset of the phase 3 study population with similar baseline characteristics. The effects of bazedoxifene on incidence of fractures, bone turnover markers, and lipid metabolism were similar between studies. There were no major differences in safety parameters between studies. The greater improvement in lumbar spine BMD and similar results in bone turnover markers, fracture incidence, and safety profile observed with bazedoxifene in the phase 2 study compared with the phase 3 study confirmed the feasibility of extrapolating the global clinical data to a Japanese population.


Subject(s)
Bone Density/drug effects , Indoles/administration & dosage , Lumbar Vertebrae/drug effects , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Density Conservation Agents/chemistry , Cohort Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Fracture Healing , Fractures, Bone/etiology , Humans , Japan , Lipids/chemistry , Middle Aged , Patient Safety , Postmenopause
2.
Calcif Tissue Int ; 94(2): 170-5, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23963633

ABSTRACT

We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial to assess the effect of 28.2 µg teriparatide versus placebo (1.4 µg teriparatide) on reduction of the incidence of vertebral fractures. Individuals enrolled in this study included patients with primary osteoporosis with one to five vertebral fractures and capable of self-supported walking. Attention was focused on incident vertebral fractures, change in bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine, and safety. A total of 316 subjects participated in the study, which lasted up to 131 weeks. Incident vertebral fractures occurred in 3.3% of subjects in the 28.2 µg teriparatide-treated group and 12.6% of subjects in the placebo group during the 78-weeks study period. Kaplan-Meier estimates of risk after 78 weeks were 7.5 and 22.2 % in the teriparatide and placebo groups, respectively, with a relative risk reduction of 66.4% by teriparatide (P = 0.008). Lumbar BMD in the 28.2 µg teriparatide group increased significantly by 4.4 ± 4.7 % at 78 weeks, which was significantly higher than the corresponding data in the placebo group (P = 0.001). Adverse events were observed in 86.7% of individuals in the teriparatide group and 86.1% of those in the placebo group. In conclusion, weekly injection of a low-dose of teriparatide (28.2 µg) reduced the risk of incident vertebral fractures and increased lumbar BMD.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Spinal Fractures/prevention & control , Teriparatide/administration & dosage , Aged , Bone Density/drug effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Injections , Lumbar Vertebrae , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis/complications , Risk Factors , Spinal Fractures/etiology
3.
J Clin Densitom ; 17(1): 150-5, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23916756

ABSTRACT

The fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX(®)) has been developed for the identification of individuals with high risk of fracture in whom treatment to prevent fractures would be appropriate. FRAX models are not yet available for all countries or ethnicities, but surrogate models can be used within regions with similar fracture risk. The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) and International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) are nonprofit multidisciplinary international professional organizations. Their visions are to advance the awareness, education, prevention, and treatment of osteoporosis. In November 2010, the IOF/ISCD FRAX initiative was held in Bucharest, bringing together international experts to review and create evidence-based official positions guiding clinicians for the practical use of FRAX. A consensus meeting of the Asia-Pacific (AP) Panel of the ISCD recently reviewed the most current Official Positions of the Joint Official Positions of ISCD and IOF on FRAX in view of the different population characteristics and health standards in the AP regions. The reviewed position statements included not only the key spectrum of positions but also unique concerns in AP regions.


Subject(s)
Asian People , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Osteoporotic Fractures/diagnosis , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Absorptiometry, Photon , Algorithms , Asia , Bone Density , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Oceania , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
4.
J Clin Densitom ; 16(4): 496-507, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24090645

ABSTRACT

The technique of body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has been used for several years in the research environment. Its ability to accurately and precisely measure lean, fat, and mineral composition in various body compartments has been well validated. Furthermore, the technique is widely available to clinical patients on existing DXA instruments throughout the world through the use of specific software packages and scanning algorithms. There have been few clear statements regarding the clinical indications for body composition measurement in patients outside the research setting. This is in part because of the lack of specific documented interventions that would be affected by body composition test results, beyond usual clinical advice. We have examined a few of the most common, specific scenarios (HIV therapy, sarcopenia, bariatric surgery, obesity) and proposed indications for body composition assessment. We have also discussed contraindications to body composition testing.


Subject(s)
Body Composition , Congresses as Topic , Osteoporosis/diagnostic imaging , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Societies, Medical , Absorptiometry, Photon/methods , Algorithms , Bone Density , Humans , Osteoporosis/metabolism
5.
J Bone Miner Res ; 26(3): 519-29, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20839291

ABSTRACT

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response late phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene in postmenopausal Japanese women 85 years of age or younger with osteoporosis. Eligible subjects received daily treatment with oral doses of bazedoxifene 20 or 40 mg or placebo for 2 years. Efficacy assessments included bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and other skeletal sites, bone turnover marker levels, lipid parameters, and incidence of new fractures. Of 429 randomized subjects, 387 were evaluable for efficacy, and 423 were included in the safety analyses (mean age, 64 years). At 2 years, the mean percent changes from baseline in lumbar spine BMD were significantly greater with bazedoxifene 20 and 40 mg (2.43% and 2.74%, respectively) than with placebo (-0.65%, p < .001 for both). Both bazedoxifene doses significantly improved BMD at the total hip, femoral neck, and greater trochanter compared with placebo (p < .001 for all). Decreases in bone turnover markers were observed with bazedoxifene 20 and 40 mg as early as 12 weeks (p < .05 for all) and were sustained throughout the study. Total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were significantly decreased from baseline with both bazedoxifene doses compared with placebo (p < .05 for all). Incidences of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures were similar among the bazedoxifene and placebo groups. Overall, the incidence of adverse events with bazedoxifene 20 and 40 mg was similar to that with placebo. Bazedoxifene significantly improved BMD, reduced bone turnover, and was well tolerated in postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis.


Subject(s)
Asian People , Bone Density/drug effects , Bone Remodeling/drug effects , Indoles/pharmacology , Indoles/therapeutic use , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/drug therapy , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/physiopathology , Biomarkers/blood , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/pharmacology , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Demography , Female , Humans , Incidence , Indoles/adverse effects , Japan/epidemiology , Lipid Metabolism/drug effects , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/blood , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/complications , Osteoporotic Fractures/complications , Osteoporotic Fractures/drug therapy , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Osteoporotic Fractures/physiopathology
6.
J Bone Miner Metab ; 29(1): 37-43, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20461422

ABSTRACT

The aim of osteoporosis treatment is to prevent future fractures. Although concurrent treatment has been used very frequently for osteoporosis in clinical practice, there are no data on accurate and verified effectiveness of concurrent treatment for fracture prevention in patients with osteoporosis. To clarify the clinical usefulness of concurrent treatment, the Japan Osteoporosis Society has authorized the establishment of the A-TOP (Adequate Treatment of Osteoporosis) research group. The objective of this research is to establish a design for a clinical trial to prove whether concurrent treatment using both alfacalcidol (1-alpha-hydroxycholecalciferol) and alendronate is more effective as compared to treatment using alendronate alone in terms of fracture prevention. The present study was named JOINT (Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial) and is based on a method using national, prospective, randomized, open-labeled, blinded endpoints focusing on postmenopausal osteoporosis with a high risk for fracture. The patients were mainly selected by practitioners and allocated randomly by a central registration system into two groups, of which one received 5 mg/day of alendronate alone, and the other received 1 µg/day of 1-alpha-hydroxycholecalciferol (alfacalcidol) in addition to the alendronate. The endpoints focused primarily on fracture prevention, and the patients' quality of life (QOL) and change in body height, as well as adherence and the adverse events of the treatments were evaluated secondarily. To obtain sufficient statistical power in the events during a 2-year observation period, the patients who are expected to have higher risk were selected to participate in this study, and it was decided that the final plan would involve 890 patients per group (two-sided alpha = 0.05, power = 0.8). Data collection began in November 2003. Correspondence regarding the registration of the investigator and the progress of the study was conducted through a web system from the Public Health Research Foundation to practitioners.


Subject(s)
Alendronate/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Hydroxycholecalciferols/therapeutic use , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Absorptiometry, Photon , Aged , Humans , Japan , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control
7.
J Clin Densitom ; 13(4): 346-51, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20663696

ABSTRACT

The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (lSCD) is a nonprofit multidisciplinary international professional organization. The ISCD mission is to advance excellence in the assessment of skeletal health. To achieve this mission, the ISCD has conducted a number of Position Development Conferences over the past 10yr, bringing together international experts to review and create evidence-based position statements guiding clinicians involved in the area. The Asia-Pacific (AP) Panel of the ISCD was formed to give regional input to the ISCD from the AP Region and to oversee ISCD education and certification programs in the region. An AP Panel consensus meeting recently reviewed the most current Official Positions of the ISCD in view of the different population characteristics and health standards in the region. The reviewed position statements included those for bone testing by central and peripheral devices but did not include ISCD Official Positions on Vertebral Fracture Assessment or pediatric bone mineral density.


Subject(s)
Absorptiometry, Photon/standards , Bone Density/physiology , Osteoporosis/diagnostic imaging , Osteoporosis/physiopathology , Asia , Fractures, Bone/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Bone/physiopathology , Humans , Pacific Islands , Risk Assessment , Societies, Medical
8.
Brain Nerve ; 61(5): 581-9, 2009 May.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19514519

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: In the management of acute ischemic stroke, a diagnostic procedure is critically important. However, till date, no guideline or consensus regarding a standard diagnosis procedure has been established. We hereby report an institutional manual for the consistent diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: The institutional manual was based on the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke III classification; however, the criteria for each stroke subtype were clearly defined using a rating system that included the representative observations specific to each subtype. The present manual was prepared in order to clearly define the characteristics of the stroke subtypes, which are often ambiguous in the clinical settings, and to design a diagnostic procedure within the institute with more emphasis on standardization rather than achieving complete accuracy. Several characteristic points were considered while doing this: lacunar infarctions should be clearly differentiated from other small infarctions, subtypes of "suspicious cardioembolism," "atherothrombotic infarction (embolic mechanism)," and "infarction due to arterial dissection" should be determined separately in order to identify the causal mechanism to the extent possible. For a final diagnosis, the patients were examined 3 time points during: at admission, during the subacute stage (day 4-7), and at discharge or more than 2 weeks after the onset of stroke. The current version of the manual has been used since 2006 after a transitional phase from 2004 to 2005. Retrospective comparisons on stroke diagnoses and clinical outcomes were performed between the periods during which the present manual was used and those during which it was not. RESULTS: The present manual was retrospectively applied for diagnosing 311 consecutive ischemic stroke patients who were admitted to our institute within 7 days after the onset in 2003; in the case of 85 patients (29%), the diagnosis was different from that made in 2003. Of all the lacunar infections reported in 2003, 17 were diagnosed as other conditions when the manual was used. Similarly, 45% of the cases of atherothrombotic infarction (thrombotic mechanism) and 24% of those of cardiac embolism in 2003 were diagnosed differently when the present manual was applied. The mean modified Rankin scale at discharge was 2.63 +/- 0.07 (mean +/- standard error of the mean) in patients in 2002 and 2003 (n=491), which was significantly different from 2.32 +/- 0.06 in patients in 2006 through March of 2008 (n=903; p=0.01). CONCLUSION: The present manual appears to be helpful to improve the uniformity of the diagnoses and the clinical results. It may also assist residents and their mentors in the educational field. The manual will require periodical evaluation and version upgrade in order to maintain its efficacy.


Subject(s)
Manuals as Topic/standards , Stroke/diagnosis , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Angiography , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Reference Standards , Retrospective Studies , Stroke/classification , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
9.
Bone ; 44(6): 1078-84, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19264155

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In a randomized, active-controlled, double-blinded, multicenter study, the efficacy and safety of minodronate were examined and compared to that of alendronate. METHODS: A total of 270 postmenopausal osteoporotic women >or=45 years of age were randomized into the minodronate group (n=135) or alendronate group (n=135). Each subject received 1 mg minodronate or 5 mg alendronate once a day for 12 months. RESULTS: Both treatment groups showed similar changes in BMD after 12 months. After 1 year of treatment, the lumbar spine BMD increased by 5.86% and 6.29% in the minodronate and alendronate groups, respectively, and the total hip BMD increased by 3.47% and 3.27%, respectively. Bone turnover markers were rapidly reduced within 1 month in both treatment groups. Urine DPD was significantly lower in the minodronate group than in the alendronate group at 6 months, and urine NTX was significantly lower in the minodronate group than in the alendronate group at 1 and 9 months. Both completion rates for the 12-month study and the overall incidence of clinical adverse events, including gastrointestinal events, were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The effects on lumbar and hip BMD and the safety profile of minodronate are comparable to those of alendronate. Minodronate is a promising new potent bisphosphonate for the treatment of osteoporosis.


Subject(s)
Alendronate/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Imidazoles/therapeutic use , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/drug therapy , Aged , Alendronate/administration & dosage , Alendronate/adverse effects , Bone Density/physiology , Diphosphonates/administration & dosage , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Imidazoles/administration & dosage , Imidazoles/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
10.
J Bone Miner Metab ; 27(3): 333-40, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19172219

ABSTRACT

The effect of vitamin K(2) (menatetrenone) on bone turnover was investigated in postmenopausal patients with osteoporosis. A 6-month open-label, randomized prospective study was conducted in 109 patients. The control group (n = 53) received calcium aspartate (133.8 mg of elemental calcium daily), while the menatetrenone group (n = 56) received 45 mg of menatetrenone daily for 6 months. Serum and urinary levels of bone turnover markers were monitored. The serum level of undercarboxylated osteocalcin (uc-OC) was significantly lower (P < 0.001) in the menatetrenone group than in the control group (at 1 month), while there was a higher level of osteocalcin containing gamma-carboxylated glutamic acid (Gla-OC) in the menatetrenone group than the control group (P = 0.018). Significant differences of uc-OC and Gla-OC between the two groups were observed from 1 month onward. In addition, a higher level of intact osteocalcin was found in the menatetrenone group compared with the control group after 6 months (P = 0.006). Assessment of bone resorption markers showed that menatetrenone therapy was associated with significantly higher urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX) excretion compared with the control group after 6 months, while there was no significant difference of urinary deoxypyridinoline excretion between the two groups. In conclusion, one month of menatetrenone therapy enhanced the secretion and gamma-carboxylation of osteocalcin, while urinary NTX excretion was increased after 6 months of treatment. Further investigations are required to determine whether the effects of menatetrenone on bone turnover are associated with fracture prevention.


Subject(s)
Bone Remodeling , Hemostatics/therapeutic use , Osteocalcin/metabolism , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/drug therapy , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/physiopathology , Protein Processing, Post-Translational , Vitamin K 2/analogs & derivatives , Aged , Biomarkers/metabolism , Bone Density/drug effects , Bone Remodeling/drug effects , Calcium/urine , Female , Hemostatics/adverse effects , Hormones/metabolism , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/drug effects , Lumbar Vertebrae/physiopathology , Osteocalcin/blood , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/blood , Protein Processing, Post-Translational/drug effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vitamin K 2/adverse effects , Vitamin K 2/pharmacology , Vitamin K 2/therapeutic use
11.
J Clin Densitom ; 11(1): 188-206, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18442759

ABSTRACT

Peripheral assessment of bone density using photon absorptiometry techniques has been available for over 40 yr. The initial use of radio-isotopes as the photon source has been replaced by the use of X-ray technology. A wide variety of models of single- or dual-energy X-ray measurement tools have been made available for purchase, although not all are still commercially available. The Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) have been developed following a systematic review of the literature by an ISCD task force and a subsequent Position Development Conference. These cover the technological diversity among peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (pDXA) devices; define whether pDXA can be used for fracture risk assessment and/or to diagnose osteoporosis; examine whether pDXA can be used to initiate treatment and/or monitor treatment; provide recommendations for pDXA reporting; and review quality assurance and quality control necessary for effective use of pDXA.


Subject(s)
Absorptiometry, Photon/standards , Fractures, Bone/diagnostic imaging , Osteoporosis/diagnostic imaging , Absorptiometry, Photon/instrumentation , Bone Density , Fractures, Bone/therapy , Humans , Osteoporosis/therapy , Predictive Value of Tests , Societies, Medical
13.
Clin Calcium ; 16(10): 1632- 38, 2006 Oct.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17012814

ABSTRACT

Milk has beneficial effects on bone health than other food sources. Recent in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that milk whey protein, especially its basic protein fraction (milk basic protein: MBP), contains components capable of promoting bone formation and inhibiting bone resorption. We tried to examine the effect of MBP on bone mineral density (BMD) and markers of bone metabolism in healthy young adult women and perimenopausal women. In the healthy young women study, we found that MBP increased BMD, by promoting bone formation and inhibiting bone resorption. In the healthy perimenopausal women study, we also found that MBP increased BMD, primarily by inhibiting bone resorption, while maintaining bone formation. Thus, bone remodeling balances become positive that leads to maintenance or increase of bone formation. MBP supplementation could be effective for bone health in a wide range of generation especially those who hate to drink milk.


Subject(s)
Bone Density/drug effects , Milk Proteins/pharmacology , Adult , Bone Resorption/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Osteogenesis/drug effects , Perimenopause , Whey Proteins
14.
J Bone Miner Metab ; 24(5): 405-13, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16937274

ABSTRACT

In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind controlled trial, the efficacy and safety of once-weekly dosing with 17.5 mg risedronate was compared with once-daily dosing with 2.5 mg risedronate in Japanese patients with involutional osteoporosis. A total of 496 patients were randomized to receive either once-weekly (n = 249) or once-daily (n = 247) treatment. All patients were supplemented with 200 mg/day calcium. Following 48 weeks of treatment, the mean (+/-SD) percent changes, from baseline, in the bone mineral density of the lumbar spine (L2-L4 BMD) in the once-weekly and once-daily treatment groups were 5.36 +/- 4.27% and 5.87 +/- 4.47%, respectively. The difference between the groups was -0.5% (95% confidence interval: -1.35% to 0.35%), demonstrating that the effect on BMD of once-weekly treatment was not inferior to that of once-daily treatment. The time-course reductions in biochemical markers of bone resorption (urinary N- and C-telopeptide of type I collagen) and bone formation (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) were similar for the two dosing regimens. There were no differences in the incidence of new vertebral fractures or the worsening of existing fractures between the once-weekly (2.2%) and once-daily (2.7%) dosing regimens. No significant differences were observed between the two dosing regimens in the incidence or the type of adverse events. However, 10.1% of the patients in the once-daily group withdrew due to adverse events as compared to 5.2% in the once-weekly group. Moreover, drug-related adverse events, including upper gastrointestinal disorders and abnormal changes in laboratory parameters, tended to be less in the once-weekly dosing regimen than in the once-daily dosing regimen. In conclusion, once-weekly oral dosing with 17.5 mg risedronate was well tolerated in Japanese osteoporotic patients, and showed equivalent efficacy to once-daily oral dosing with 2.5 mg risedronate. This once-weekly regimen is expected to provide a more convenient therapeutic option as an alternative to daily dosing and to enhance patient compliance in long-term therapy for osteoporosis.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/pharmacology , Etidronic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Aged , Bone Density/drug effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Etidronic Acid/adverse effects , Etidronic Acid/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risedronic Acid
15.
J Infect Chemother ; 11(5): 262-4, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16258826

ABSTRACT

The in vitro activity of antimicrobial agents against Streptococcus pneumoniae was determined using 16 strains of penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae (PSSP) and 26 strains of penicillin intermediately resistant S. pneumoniae (PISP) + penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae (PRSP) in Japan. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of potent antibiotics, including eight beta-lactams (benzylpenicillin, ampicillin, cefotiam, cefepime, cefditoren, faropenem, panipenem, and biapenem), three macrolides (erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin), telithromycin, and three fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and gatifloxacin), were determined. Twenty-three strains exhibited genetic variations at pbp1a + pbp2x + pbp2b, which are genetic-PRSP (g-PRSP). g-PISP strains accounted for 62.5% (10/16) of the PSSP strains. The existence of an abnormal pbp gene conferred not only penicillin resistance but resistance to cephems; however, panipenem and biapenem had potent in vitro efficacy against alterations. Regarding the macrolide resistance mechanisms (mefA or ermB): 16 isolates had only mefA, 18 isolates had ermB, and 2 isolates had both mefA and ermB. There was no correlation between the existence of an abnormal pbp gene and the existence of the mefA gene or the ermB gene.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/genetics , Fluoroquinolones/pharmacology , Macrolides/pharmacology , Streptococcus pneumoniae/drug effects , beta-Lactams/pharmacology , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Humans , Ketolides/pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Streptococcus pneumoniae/genetics
16.
Osteoporos Int ; 16(12): 2123-8, 2005 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16133638

ABSTRACT

Milk has more beneficial effects on bone health than other food sources. Recent in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that milk whey protein, especially its basic protein fraction (milk basic protein, MBP), contains several components capable of promoting bone formation and inhibiting bone resorption. The object of this study was to examine the effect of MBP on the bone metabolism of healthy menopausal women. Thirty-two healthy menopausal women were randomly assigned to treatment with either placebo or MBP (40 mg per day) for 6 months. The bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar vertebrae L2-L4 of each subject was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at 0 and 6 months of treatment. Serum and urine indices of bone metabolism were measured at 0, 3 and 6 months. Twenty-seven subjects who completed the study in accordance with the protocol were included in the analysis. The mean rate of gain of lumbar BMD in the MBP group (1.21%) was significantly higher than in the placebo group (-0.66%, P=0.046). When compared with the placebo group, urinary cross-linked N-telopeptides of type-I collagen (NTx) were significantly decreased in the MBP group at 6 months, but no significant difference in serum osteocalcin was observed between the two groups. The urinary NTx excretion was found to be related to serum osteocalcin in the MBP group at 3 and 6 months, indicating that MBP maintained the balance of bone remodeling. These results suggested that MBP supplementation was effective in preventing bone loss in menopausal women and that this improvement in BMD may be primarily mediated through the inhibition of bone resorption while maintaining the balance of bone remodeling by MBP supplementation.


Subject(s)
Bone and Bones/metabolism , Dietary Supplements , Milk Proteins/administration & dosage , Absorptiometry, Photon/methods , Adult , Biomarkers/analysis , Bone Density/physiology , Bone Remodeling/physiology , Collagen/urine , Collagen Type I , Diet , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae , Menopause/physiology , Middle Aged , Osteocalcin/blood , Peptides/urine , Vitamins/administration & dosage , Whey Proteins
17.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16536061

ABSTRACT

We investigated the usefullness of Binax NOW urine antigen test, an immunochromatographic assay that binds any soluble Streptococcus pneumoniae antigen (C polysaccharide) for the diagnosis of penumoniae form September 2003 to March 2005. We used 372 samples form the patinets with pneumoniae diagnosed for blood or sputum cultuter or gram-stained sputum smear. Out of 24 culture positive specimens, Binax NOW urine antigen test, showed positive in 18 (75%) specimens. The sensitivity of sputum and blood culture was 71.7% and 83.3%, respectively. Binax NOW urine antigen test was seemed false positives in 55 samples, false negatives in 6 samples. The specificity of Binax NOW urine antigen test was evaluated 84.1%. Overall agreement among tests was 83.6%. When compared to culture, false negative urine antigen may be the result of colonizing S. pneumoniae in sputum or pneumonia caused by an agent other than S. pneumoniae. CRP values for cases were both urine antigen and culture were positive ranged from 40 mg/dl to 10 mg/dl while urine antigen and culture negative cases were predominantly less than 10 mg/dl. Positive blood and pleural fluid culture cases were consistently associated with strongly positive urine antigen tests. Non-agreement between urine antigen, culture, and microscopy may be the result of specimen quality, labile nature of S. pneumoniae and antimicrobial therapy.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Bacterial/urine , Bacterial Capsules/immunology , Bacteriological Techniques/instrumentation , Pneumonia, Pneumococcal/immunology , Streptococcus pneumoniae/immunology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Middle Aged , Sensitivity and Specificity
18.
Adv Perit Dial ; 20: 52-7, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15384795

ABSTRACT

Peritonitis is one of the most serious complications of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Approximately 20% of peritonitis infections have been reported to be resistant to initial therapy, either failing to resolve with appropriate antibiotics or relapsing within 2 weeks of antibiotic discontinuation. To investigate the current situation with regard to resistant peritonitis, we retrospectively examined the incidence and the organisms of resistant peritonitis in our unit over a period of 9 years. From January 1, 1994, to January 1, 2003, we introduced 325 patients onto CAPD. At January 1, 2003, we followed up 172 patients who were receiving CAPD in our unit. During 1994-1996, 12 cases of peritonitis and 3 cases of resistant peritonitis (25%) occurred among our patients. Microbiologic examination revealed that the organisms involved in peritonitis were alpha-streptococcus (17%), coagulase-negative staphylococcus [CNS (17%)], and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus [MSSA (17%)]. The organisms of resistant peritonitis were methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA (67%)] and methicillin-resistant CNS (33%). During 1997-1999, 39 cases of peritonitis and 13 cases of resistant peritonitis (33%) occurred among our patients. The most frequently cultured organisms in peritonitis were CNS (26%), Candida species (13%), and alpha-streptococcus (10%). The organisms of resistant peritonitis were methicillin-resistant CNS (46%) and Candida species (38%). In the most recent 3-year period (2000-2002), our patients experienced 57 cases of peritonitis and 24 cases of resistant peritonitis (42%). The organisms of peritonitis were alpha-streptococcus (46%), CNS, MSSA, Escherichia coli, and Candida species (38%). However, the organisms of resistant peritonitis were methicillin-resistant CNS (13%), Candida species (21%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13%), Serratia (13%), Citrobacter (13%), and Corynebacterium (13%). In the last several years, methicillin-resistant CNS has come to be main organism of resistant peritonitis. In addition, opportunistic infection has become a serious peritonitis problem. Given these data, we conclude that the incidence of resistant peritonitis is increasing and that the organisms of resistant peritonitis are changing.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory/adverse effects , Peritonitis/microbiology , Bacterial Infections/etiology , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Candida/isolation & purification , Coagulase/biosynthesis , Humans , Methicillin Resistance , Peritonitis/drug therapy , Peritonitis/etiology , Recurrence , Staphylococcus/drug effects , Staphylococcus/enzymology , Staphylococcus/isolation & purification , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Streptococcus/drug effects , Streptococcus/isolation & purification
19.
J Bone Miner Metab ; 22(5): 469-78, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15316868

ABSTRACT

To demonstrate the clinical benefit of risedronate at 2.5 mg daily in the treatment of involutional osteoporosis, the effect of risedronate on incidence of vertebral fracture was compared with that of etidronate. A total of 547 patients with one to four vertebral fractures were randomized to receive either treatment with 2.5 mg/day of risedronate or intermittent treatment (treatment of 2 weeks and off period of 10 weeks) with 200 mg/day of etidronate for 96 weeks in a double-masked fashion. All patients received 200 mg calcium supplement daily. Lateral and anteroposterior thoracic and lumbar spine radiographs were obtained at baseline and at 24, 48, 72, and 96 weeks. Cumulative incidence rates of patients who had at least one new or worsening vertebral fracture during the 96-week period were 12.3% for risedronate and 14.2% for etidronate, and it was verified that the fracture prevention effect of risedronate was not inferior to that of etidronate. The incidence rates of fracture during the initial 24-week period were 8.8% for risedronate and 6.0% for etidronate, but the cumulative incidence rate of fracture from 24 to 96 weeks was lower in the risedronate group (3.9%) as compared to the etidronate group (8.7%). Height loss was significantly less in the risedronate group (-0.28 cm) than in the etidronate group (-0.70 cm) after 96 weeks. Decreases in bone resorption markers including urinary total deoxypyridinoline and NTX were significantly greater in the risedronate group than in the etidronate group throughout the treatment period. An improvement of patient QOL was observed in both groups. No significant difference in the incidence of adverse events was observed between the two treatments. Daily oral risedronate (2.5 mg) was shown to provide an effective therapy for involutional osteoporosis in Japanese patients with good tolerability.


Subject(s)
Etidronic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Etidronic Acid/therapeutic use , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/drug therapy , Spinal Fractures/prevention & control , Aged , Alkaline Phosphatase/blood , Alkaline Phosphatase/drug effects , Amino Acids/urine , Biomarkers , Body Height/drug effects , Bone and Bones/drug effects , Bone and Bones/metabolism , Collagen/urine , Collagen Type I , Female , Humans , Incidence , Japan/epidemiology , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/epidemiology , Peptides/urine , Quality of Life , Risedronic Acid , Spinal Fractures/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
20.
Kansenshogaku Zasshi ; 78(4): 305-11, 2004 Apr.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15176234

ABSTRACT

Arbekacin-resistant, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was frequently isolated in Saitama Medical School Hospital during 1996 and 1998. The minimum inhibitory concentration for ABK was 8 micrograms/ml in 14 strains, 16 micrograms/ml in 6 strains, and 32 micrograms/ml in 2 strains. The maximum isolation rate of these resistant strains in one month was 8%. Use of ABK in the hospital did not increase during the same period. The infection control team (ICT) of the hospital recognized the increase of resistant strains and started intervention for the hospital staff. The ICT instructed the staff of each ward to follow standard precautions for the prevention of nosocomial infections and the risk of ABK-resistant MRSA was explained repeatedly. Thereafter, the isolation rate decreased to 3%. An epidemiological study was done using 22 strains of ABK-resistant MRSA that were isolated in this period. The strains originated from different patients and from 10 different wards, which were designated as wards A to J. Eight strains were isolated from surgical ward A, followed by the other wards (ward B: 3, C: 2, D: 2, E: 2, F: 1, G: 1, H: 1, I: 1, J: 1). The specimens from which ABK-resistant MRSA were isolated were as follows,: sputum: 4, wound: 4, decubitus ulcer: 4, urine: 2, pus: 2, blood :1, central venous catheter: 1, drainage tube: 1, tracheal aspirate: 1, skin: 1, stool: 1. Several investigations were done using these strains. Sensitivity tests for ABK, VCM, MINO, LVFX, FOM, IPM were performed by the standard method of the Japan Society for Chemotherapy. Coagulase types were determined. Production of toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1), enterotoxin, and beta-lactamase was assayed. Pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) using Sma I was also done and differences were compared. Seven of the 8 strains from ward A showed the same drug sensitivity profile and biological phenotype. Two of the 3 strains from ward B and 2 strains from ward C were also identical by these methods. Six of the 8 strains from ward A were also identical by PFGE. These 6 isolates showed the same drug sensitivity pattern, same coagulase type, and same production of TSST-1 and enterotoxin. Two other strains from ward B, one strain from ward F, and one from ward I also showed the same PFGE pattern, drug sensitivity profile, and toxin profile as the 6 strains from ward A. Our data show that the same strains were transmitted around the hospital during the study period, although serious nosocomial infections due to ABK-resistant MRSA were avoided. Thus, intervention by the ICT in each ward was effective. ABK-resistant MRSA should be recognized as an important hospital pathogen and should be surveyed consistently.


Subject(s)
Aminoglycosides/pharmacology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Dibekacin/analogs & derivatives , Dibekacin/pharmacology , Methicillin Resistance , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Cross Infection/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Epidemiologic Studies , Humans , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...