Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 144(1-4): 453-8, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21186215

ABSTRACT

The work package 3 of the ORAMED project, Collaborative Project (2008-11) supported by the European Commission within its seventh Framework Programme, is focused on the optimisation of the use of active personal dosemeters (APDs) in interventional radiology and cardiology (IR/IC). Indeed, a lack of appropriate APD devices is identified for these specific fields. Few devices can detect low-energy X rays (20-100 keV), and none of them are specifically designed for working in pulsed radiation fields. The work presented in this paper consists in studying the behaviour of some selected APDs deemed suitable for application in IR/IC. For this purpose, measurements under laboratory conditions, both with continuous and pulsed X-ray beams, and tests in real conditions on site in different European hospitals were performed. This study highlights the limitations of APDs for this application and the need of improving the APD technology so as to fulfil all needs in the IR/IC field.


Subject(s)
Cardiology , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Monitoring/instrumentation , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Radiology, Interventional , Radiometry/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Europe , Hospitals , Humans , Laboratories , Monte Carlo Method , Protective Devices , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiation, Ionizing , Radiometry/methods , Workforce , X-Rays
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 131(1): 67-72, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18757894

ABSTRACT

An intercomparison of ring dosemeters has been organised with the aim of assessing the technical capabilities of available extremity dosemeters and focusing on their performance at clinical workplaces with potentially high extremity doses. Twenty-four services from 16 countries participated in the intercomparison. The dosemeters were exposed to reference photon ((137)Cs) and beta ((147)Pm, (85)Kr and (90)Sr/(90)Y) fields together with fields representing realistic exposure situations in interventional radiology (direct and scattered radiation) and nuclear medicine ((99 m)Tc and (18)F). It has been found that most dosemeters provided satisfactory measurements of H(p)(0.07) for photon radiation, both in reference and realistic fields. However, only four dosemeters fulfilled the established requirements for all radiation qualities. The main difficulties were found for the measurement of low-energy beta radiation. Finally, the results also showed a general under-response of detectors to (18)F, which was attributed to the difficulties of the dosimetric systems to measure the positron contribution to the dose.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure , Radiometry/instrumentation , Beta Particles , Humans , Photons , Radiation Monitoring , Scattering, Radiation
3.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 131(1): 87-92, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18757898

ABSTRACT

An overview of the use of active personal dosemeters (APD) in interventional radiology is presented. It is based on the work done by the working package 7 of the CONRAD coordinated action supported by the EC within the frame of the 6th FP. This study was done in collaboration with the working package 4 of CONRAD to deal with the calculations required for studying the new calibration facility. The main requirements of the standard for the APD and the difficulties caused by the use of pulsed radiations are presented through the results of an intercomparison organised in a realistic calibration facility similar to the workplace situation in interventional radiology. The main characteristics of this facility are presented.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure , Radiation Monitoring/instrumentation , Radiology, Interventional , Radiometry/instrumentation , Calibration , Humans , Models, Theoretical , Monte Carlo Method , Phantoms, Imaging , Photons , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiometry/methods
4.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 123(1): 122-7, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16905761

ABSTRACT

This paper presents the characterisation performed at IRSN (France) of an H(p)(10) chamber in terms of calibration coefficient and correction factors for the radiation qualities of ISO narrow spectrum series. The chamber response, expressed in H(p)(10) using conversion coefficients h(p)(K)(10; N, alpha) listed in ISO 4037-3 in the energy range from 30 to 1250 keV and for angles of incidence between 0 and 70 degrees, was found to be within approximately 10%. However, for photon energies <30 keV, an overresponse of the chamber that could reach 100% was observed. Nevertheless, this overresponse was reduced to 25% using the conversion coefficients estimated at Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB). This implies that the X-ray spectra produced by the IRSN X-ray units are very similar to those produced by PTB, both containing a little bit more high-energy photons than the spectra used in ISO 4037-3. The dose rate dependence of the chamber tested by gamma radiation from (60)Co sources was found to be within 2% in the range of 0.3 mSv h(-1) to 1 Sv h(-1). The H(p)(10) chamber can measure directly the conventional true value of H(p)(10) after calibration by a reference laboratory, and can be used for transferring H(p)(10) reference quantities from a reference laboratory.


Subject(s)
Radiation Protection/standards , Radiometry/instrumentation , Calibration , Equipment Design , European Union , Humans , Incidence , Radiation Dosage , Reference Standards
5.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 125(1-4): 369-75, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17189278

ABSTRACT

IRSN has been asked by SNCF (French Railways) to carry out measurements in order to establish the values of ambient dose equivalents H*(10) in the vicinity of shipments of radioactive materials to assess the external exposure to ionising radiation to which employees may be subjected during the carriage of radioactive goods. Detailed dosimetric characterisations of the wagons have been made and the external exposure at different stages of the work that is done by the employees have been measured in terms of H*(10). For the study presented in this paper, and corresponding to a used fuel shipment composed of UO2 and UO2-PuO2, it has been observed that the photon and neutron doses are very similar. In addition, the order of magnitude of the total dose integrated by an employee who would carry out 100 times the series of essential operational tasks, has been found to be approximately 250 microSv. This value is compared with those observed for other previously investigated shipments involving the exposure to photon fields only.


Subject(s)
Body Burden , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Radiation Monitoring/instrumentation , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Radioisotopes/analysis , Railroads , Specimen Handling , Computer Simulation , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis , France , Internationality , Models, Biological , Radiation Dosage , Relative Biological Effectiveness , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
6.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 120(1-4): 378-82, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16644993

ABSTRACT

This work describes spectral distributions of neutrons obtained as function of energy and direction at four workplace fields at the Krümmel reactor in Germany. Values of personal dose equivalent H(p)(10) and effective dose E are determined for different directions of a person's orientation in these fields and readings of personal neutron dosemeters--especially electronic dosemeters--are discussed with respect to H(p)(10) and E.


Subject(s)
Neutrons , Nuclear Reactors , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Radiation Protection/methods , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/instrumentation , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Electronics , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis , Germany , Radiation Dosage , Reproducibility of Results , Semiconductors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Surface Properties , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/methods
7.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 110(1-4): 429-36, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15353686

ABSTRACT

In criticality accident dosimetry and more generally for high dose measurements, special techniques are used to measure separately the gamma ray and neutron components of the dose. To improve these techniques and to check their dosimetry systems (physical and/or biological), a total of 60 laboratories from 29 countries (America, Europe, Asia) participated in an international intercomparaison, which took place in France from 9 to 21 June 2002, at the SILENE reactor in Valduc and at a pure gamma source in Fontenay-aux-Roses. This intercomparison was jointly organised by the IRSN and the CEA with the help of the NEA/OCDE and was partly supported by the European Communities. This paper describes the aim of this intercomparison, the techniques used by the participants and the two radiation sources and their characteristics. The experimental arrangements of the dosemeters for the irradiations in free air or on phantoms are given. Then the dosimetric quantities measured and reported by the participants are summarised, analysed and compared with the reference values. The present paper concerns only the physical dosimetry and essentially experiments performed on the SILENE facility. The results obtained with the biological dosimetry are published in two other papers of this issue.


Subject(s)
Radiation Protection/methods , Radiation Protection/standards , Radioactive Hazard Release , Radiometry/methods , Radiometry/standards , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Assessment/standards , Body Burden , France , Humans , International Cooperation , Nuclear Reactors , Observer Variation , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Radiation Dosage , Reference Standards , Relative Biological Effectiveness , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors , Safety Management/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity
8.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 110(1-4): 459-64, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15353691

ABSTRACT

An international intercomparison of criticality accident dosimetry systems took place in the SILENE reactor, in June 2002. Participants from 60 laboratories irradiated their dosemeters (physical and biological) using two different configurations of the reactor. In preparation for this intercomparison, the leakage radiation fields were characterised by spectrometry and dosimetry measurements using the ROSPEC spectrometer associated with a NE-213 scintillator, ionisation chambers, GM counters, diodes and thermoluminescence dosemeters (TLDs). For this intercomparison, a large area was required to irradiate the dosemeters both in free air and on phantoms. Therefore, measurements of the uniformity of the field were performed with activation detectors and TLDs for neutron and gammas, respectively. This paper describes the procedures used and the results obtained.


Subject(s)
Neutrons , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiation Protection/standards , Radioactive Hazard Release , Radiometry/instrumentation , Radiometry/standards , Risk Assessment/methods , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis/methods , France , Humans , International Cooperation , Nuclear Reactors , Observer Variation , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Radiation Dosage , Radiometry/methods , Reference Standards , Relative Biological Effectiveness , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment/standards , Risk Factors , Safety Management/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Spectrum Analysis/instrumentation , Spectrum Analysis/methods , Spectrum Analysis/standards
9.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 96(1-3): 245-9, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11586741

ABSTRACT

Following the specifications and test methods given by international standards IEC-61526 and ISO 4037, the dosimetry department of the IPSN studied the photon radiation performance of seven recent electronic personal dosemeters: The personal dosimetric performance of each piece of equipment was tested with X and gamma radiation between 12 keV and 1.25 MeV.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution, Radioactive/analysis , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Photons , Radiation Monitoring/instrumentation , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Radiometry/instrumentation , Electronics , Equipment Design , France , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Dosage , Radiometry/standards , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...