Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 81(5): 533-540, Sept.-Oct. 2015. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-766282

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: Mucosal leishmaniosis (ML) is a severe clinical form of leishmaniosis. Complex factors related to the parasite and the host are attributed to the development of mucosal lesions. Leishmania RNA virus 1 (LRV1) can disrupt immune response, and may be the main determinant of severity of the disease; it should be investigated. OBJECTIVE: To study the existence of clinical differences between patients with ML with endosymbiosis by LRV1 and. those without it. METHODS: A cross-sectional cohort study with clinical evaluation, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of Leishmania, species classification, and search of LRV1 was performed. Only patients with confirmed diagnosis of ML by positive PCR and with nasal mucosa injuries were included in this analysis. RESULTS: Out of 37 patients, 30 (81.1%) were diagnosed with Leishmania braziliensis, five (13.5%) with Leishmania guyanensis, and two (5.4%) with mixed infection of L. braziliensis and L. guyanensis. LVR1 virus was present in 26 (70.3%) of the cases. CONCLUSION: Correlation between clinical phenotype and presence of LRV1 was not observed, although the frequency of the virus is two-fold higher in mucosal lesions than that found in the literature on skin lesions in the same geographical area.


RESUMO Introdução: A leishmaniose de mucosa (LM) é uma forma clínica grave da leishmaniose. Fatores complexos ligados ao parasita e ao hospedeiro são atribuídos ao desenvolvimento das lesões de mucosa. Leishmania RNA Vírus 1 (LRV1) pode subverter a resposta imune, podendo ser o principal determinante da gravidade da doença e deve ser pesquisado. Objetivo: Estudar a existência de diferenças clínicas entre pacientes portadores de LM com endosimbiose por LRV1 e as que não possuem. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo de coorte histórica com corte transversal com avaliação clínica, detecção da Leishmania por técnica de PCR, classificação da espécie e pesquisa de LRV1. Foram incluídos na análise da pesquisa somente os pacientes com diagnóstico confirmado de LM com PCR positivo, com lesão de mucosa nasal. Resultados: Dos 37 pacientes, 30 (81,1%) foram diagnosticados com L. braziliensis, 5 (13,5%) com L. guyanensis e 2 (5,4%) com infecção mista de L. braziliensis e L. guyanensis. O vírus LVR1 estava presente em 26 casos (70,3%). Conclusão: A correlação entre o fenótipo clínico e a presença do LRV1 não foi constatada, porém a frequência do vírus é duas vezes maior em lesão de mucosa do que encontrado em trabalho, da mesma região, sobre lesão cutânea.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Leishmania/virology , Leishmaniasis, Mucocutaneous/virology , Leishmaniavirus/genetics , Nasal Mucosa/parasitology , RNA Viruses/genetics , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Leishmania/classification , Leishmaniasis, Mucocutaneous/genetics , Phenotype , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Severity of Illness Index
2.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 9(9): e0004079, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26372217

ABSTRACT

Tegumentary Leishmaniasis (TL) is endemic in Latin America, and Brazil contributes approximately 20 thousand cases per year. The pathogenesis of TL, however, is still not fully understood. Clinical manifestations vary from cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) to more severe outcomes, such as disseminated leishmaniasis (DL), mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) and diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis (DCL). Many factors have been associated with the severity of the disease and the development of lesions. Recent studies have reported that the presence of Leishmania RNA virus 1 infecting Leishmania (Leishmania RNA virus 1, LRV1) is an important factor associated with the severity of ML in experimental animal models. In the present study, 156 patients who attended Rondonia's Hospital of Tropical Medicine with both leishmaniasis clinical diagnoses (109 CL; 38 ML; 5 CL+ML; 3 DL and 1 DCL) and molecular diagnoses were investigated. The clinical diagnosis were confirmed by PCR by targeting hsp70 and kDNA DNA sequences and the species causing the infection were determined by HSP70 PCR-RFPL. The presence of LVR1 was tested by RT-PCR. Five Leishmania species were detected: 121 (77.6%) samples were positive for Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis, 18 (11.5%) were positive for Leishmania (V.) guyanensis, 3 (1.8%) for Leishmania (V.) lainsoni, 2 (1.3%) for Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis and 2 (1.3%) for Leishmania (V.) shawi. Six (3.9%) samples were positive for Leishmania sp. but the species could not be determined, and 4 (2.6%) samples were suggestive of mixed infection by L. (V.) braziliensis and L. (V.) guyanensis. The virus was detected in L. braziliensis (N = 54), L. guyanensis (N = 5), L. amazonensis (N = 2), L. lainsoni (N = 1) and inconclusive samples (N = 6). Patients presenting with CL+ML, DL and DCL were excluded from further analysis. Association between the presence of the virus and the disease outcome were tested among the remaining 147 patients (CL = 109 and ML = 38). Of them, 71.1% (n = 27) mucosal lesions were positive for LRV1, and 28.9% (n = 11) were negative. In cutaneous lesions, 36.7% (n = 40) were positive and 63.3% (n = 69) were negative for LRV1. The ratio P(ML|LRV1+)/P(ML|LRV1-) was 2.93 (CI95% 1.57...5.46; p<0.001), thus corroborating the hypothesis of the association between LRV1 and the occurrence of mucosal leishmaniasis, as previously described in animal models; it also indicates that LRV1 is not the only factor contributing to the disease outcome.


Subject(s)
Leishmania/pathogenicity , Leishmania/virology , Leishmaniasis, Mucocutaneous/pathology , Leishmaniasis, Mucocutaneous/parasitology , Leishmaniavirus/isolation & purification , Mucous Membrane/pathology , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Brazil , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Leishmania/classification , Leishmania/genetics , Leishmaniavirus/genetics , Molecular Sequence Data , RNA, Viral/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sequence Analysis, DNA
3.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol ; 81(5): 533-40, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26277588

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Mucosal leishmaniosis (ML) is a severe clinical form of leishmaniosis. Complex factors related to the parasite and the host are attributed to the development of mucosal lesions. Leishmania RNA virus 1 (LRV1) can disrupt immune response, and may be the main determinant of severity of the disease; it should be investigated. OBJECTIVE: To study the existence of clinical differences between patients with ML with endosymbiosis by LRV1 and. those without it. METHODS: A cross-sectional cohort study with clinical evaluation, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of Leishmania, species classification, and search of LRV1 was performed. Only patients with confirmed diagnosis of ML by positive PCR and with nasal mucosa injuries were included in this analysis. RESULTS: Out of 37 patients, 30 (81.1%) were diagnosed with Leishmania braziliensis, five (13.5%) with Leishmania guyanensis, and two (5.4%) with mixed infection of L. braziliensis and L. guyanensis. LVR1 virus was present in 26 (70.3%) of the cases. CONCLUSION: Correlation between clinical phenotype and presence of LRV1 was not observed, although the frequency of the virus is two-fold higher in mucosal lesions than that found in the literature on skin lesions in the same geographical area.


Subject(s)
Leishmania/virology , Leishmaniasis, Mucocutaneous/virology , Leishmaniavirus/genetics , Nasal Mucosa/parasitology , RNA Viruses/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Leishmania/classification , Leishmaniasis, Mucocutaneous/genetics , Male , Middle Aged , Phenotype , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Severity of Illness Index , Young Adult
4.
Semina ; 15(ed.esp): 70-3, jun. 1994. tab, graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-216772

ABSTRACT

O índice cariogênico de Londrina vem caindo consideravelmente desde 1981(4,06) por cento até 1992 (1,90) por cento, segundo dados fornecidos pela Secretaria deSaúde do município de Londrina(tabela 1) comprovandoque o atendimento odontológico eficiente garante a manutençäo da saúde 33 populaçäo. A cárie se faz preocupante à medida que essa enfermidade aumenta com a idade, além disso, poderá preceder ao desenvolvimento davárias infecçöes sistêmicas, citando por exemplo o abscesso pulmonar, considerando a principal afliçäo da infäncia constituindo o maior problema da saúde pública. A fluoretaçäo da água no Conjunto Joäo Paz, situado na regiäo norte do município de Londrina, alvo de nossas pesquisas, foi somente instalada a pouco tempo, segundo dados de 1990 fornecidos pela Sanepar(Companhia de Saneamento do Paraná), constatando que o índice cariogênico de crianças atendidas no posto excedia as demais totalidadesda cidade, acompanhando a dificuldade de aquisiçäo de material e a falta de educaçäo sanitária. Apesar das doenças crônicas que atingem esta regiäo, o grupo GIM 13 escolheu a prevençäo da cárie como tema e através de trabalhos efetivos com a populaçäo e a ajuda da Clínica Universitária Odontológica Norte do Paraná, pode encaminhar propostas de soluçöes para grande parte deste problema


Subject(s)
Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Oral Hygiene
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...