ABSTRACT
Introducción: La conciliación de la medicación (CM) es una de las principales estrategias para disminuir los errores de medicación en las transiciones asistenciales. En España existen publicadas diferentes guías con recomendaciones para la implantación y el desarrollo de la CM orientadas a la población adulta, sin estar los pacientes pediátricos incluidos. En el año 2018 se llevó a cabo un estudio que permitió la posterior publicación de un documento con criterios de selección de pacientes pediátricos en los que priorizar la CM. Objetivos: Describir las características de los pacientes pediátricos con mayor probabilidad de sufrir errores de conciliación (EC), para confirmar si los resultados de un estudio previo son extrapolables. Metodología: Estudio prospectivo y multicéntrico con pacientes pediátricos ingresados. Se analizaron los EC detectados durante la realización de la CM al ingreso. La mejor historia farmacoterapéutica posible del paciente fue obtenida utilizando diferentes fuentes de información y confirmándose con una entrevista con el paciente/cuidador. Resultados: Se detectaron 1.043 discrepancias, determinándose como EC 544, afectando a 317 pacientes (43%). La omisión de algún medicamento fue el error más común (51%). La mayoría de los EC se asociaron con los medicamentos de los grupos A (31%), N (23%) y R (11%) de la clasificación ATC. La polimedicación y la enfermedad de base onco-hematológica fueron los factores de riesgo asociados a la presencia de EC con significación estadística. Conclusiones: Los hallazgos de este estudio permiten priorizar la CM en un grupo concreto de pacientes pediátricos, favoreciendo la eficiencia del proceso. Los pacientes onco-hematológicos y la polimedicación se confirman como los principales factores de riesgo para la aparición de EC en la población pediátrica.(AU)
Introduction: Medication reconciliation (MR) is one of the main strategies used to reduce medication errors in care transitions. In Spain, several guidelines have been published with recommendations for the implementation and development of MR processes aimed at the adult population, and not applicable to paediatric patients. In 2018, a study was carried out that allowed the subsequent publication of a document establishing criteria for the selection of paediatric patients in whom CM should be prioritised. Objectives: To describe the characteristics of the paediatric patients most likely to be subject to reconciliation errors (REs) to confirm whether the results of a previous study could be extrapolated. Methodology: Prospective, multicentre study in paediatric inpatients. We analysed the REs detected in the MR at the time of admission. We obtained the best possible medication history of the patient using different sources of information, subsequently confirmed through an interview with the patient/caregiver. Results: 1043 discrepancies were detected, of which 544 were categorised as REs, affecting 317 patients (43%). Omission of a drug was the most common error (51%). Most REs involved drugs in groups A (31%), N (23%) and R (11%) of the ATC classification. Polypharmacy and oncological/haematological disease were the risk factors that exhibited a statistically significant association with the occurrence of REs. Conclusions: The findings of this study allow the prioritisation of MR in a specific group of paediatric patients, contributing to improve the efficiency of the process. Oncological/haematological disease and polypharmacy were confirmed as the main risk factors for the occurrence of REs in the paediatric population.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Medication Reconciliation , Medication Errors , Patient Safety , Quality of Health Care , Spain , Pediatrics , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
Objetivo determinar la prevalencia de errores de conciliación (EC) al ingreso hospitalario en la población pediátrica onco-hematológica para comprobar si ésta presenta una susceptibilidad similar a la de los adultos para ser afectados por estos EC y describir las características de los pacientes en los que se producen.Métodoestudio prospectivo y multicéntrico de 12 meses de duración, de conciliación de medicación al ingreso en la población pediátrica onco-hematológica para evaluar la incidencia de EC y describir las características de los pacientes en los que se producen.Resultadosse concilió la medicación de 157 pacientes. En 96 pacientes se detectó al menos una discrepancia de la medicación. De las discrepancias detectadas, el 52,1% fueron justificadas por la nueva situación clínica del paciente o por el médico responsable mientras que el 48,9% se consideraron EC. El tipo de EC más frecuente fue la «omisión de algún medicamento», seguido por «una dosis, frecuencia o vía de administración diferente». Se efectuaron un total de 77 intervenciones farmacéuticas, de las que se aceptaron el 94,2%. En el grupo de pacientes con un número igual o mayor a 4 fármacos en tratamiento domiciliario se observó un incremento de 2,1 veces la probabilidad de experimentar un EC.Conclusionespara evitar o reducir los errores en uno de los puntos críticos de seguridad como son las transiciones asistenciales, existen medidas, como la conciliación de la medicación. En el caso de los pacientes pediátricos crónicos complejos, como los pacientes onco-hematológicos, el número de fármacos como parte del tratamiento domiciliario es la variable que se ha asociado a la presencia de EC al ingreso hospitalario, siendo la omisión de algún medicamento la causa principal de estos errores. (AU)
Objective To determine the prevalence of reconciliation errors (RE) on admission to hospital in the paediatric onco-haematological population in order to check whether they are similarly susceptible to these RE as adults and to describe the characteristics of the patients who suffer them.MethodsA 12-month prospective, multicentre study of medication reconciliation on admission in the paediatric onco-haematological population to assess the incidence of RE and describe the characteristics of the patients in whom they occur.ResultsMedication reconciliation was performed in 157 patients. At least 1 medication discrepancy was detected in 96 patients. Of the discrepancies detected, 52.1% were justified by the patient's new clinical situation or by the physician, while 48.9% were determined to be RE. The most frequent type of RE was the "omission of a medication", followed by "a different dose, frequency or route of administration". A total of 77 pharmaceutical interventions were carried out, 94.2% of which were accepted. In the group of patients with a number equal to or greater than 4 drugs in home treatment, there was a 2.1-fold increase in the probability of suffering a RE.ConclusionsIn order to avoid or reduce errors in one of the critical safety points such as transitions of care, there are measures such as medication reconciliation. In the case of complex chronic paediatric patients, such as onco-haematological patients, the number of drugs as part of home treatment is the variable that has been associated with the presence of medication RE on admission to hospital, with the omission of some medication being the main cause of these errors. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Medication Reconciliation , Medication Errors , Pediatrics/instrumentation , Medical Oncology , Hematology , PrevalenceABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Medication reconciliation (MC) is one of the main strategies to reduce medication errors in care transitions. In Spain, several guidelines have been published with recommendations for the implementation and development of MC aimed at the adult population, although paediatric patients are not included. In 2018, a study was carried out that led to the subsequent publication of a document with criteria for selecting paediatric patients in whom CM should be prioritised. OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics of paediatric patients most likely to suffer from errors of reconciliation (EC), to confirm whether the results of a previous study can be extrapolated. METHODOLOGY: Prospective, multicentre study of paediatric inpatients. We analysed the CE detected during the performance of the CM on admission. The best possible pharmacotherapeutic history of the patient was obtained using different sources of information and confirmed by an interview with the patient/caregiver. RESULTS: 1043 discrepancies were detected, 544 were identified as CD, affecting 317 patients (43%). Omission of a drug was the most common error (51%). The majority of CD were associated with drugs in groups A (31%), N (23%) and R (11%) of the ATC classification. Polymedication and onco-haematological based disease were the risk factors associated with the presence of CD with statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study allow prioritisation of CM in a specific group of paediatric patients, favouring the efficiency of the process. Onco-haematological patients and polymedication are confirmed as the main risk factors for the appearance of CD in the paediatric population.
Subject(s)
Medication Reconciliation , Patient Admission , Child , Humans , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Medication Reconciliation/methods , Prospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of reconciliation errors on admission to hospital in the pediatric onco-hematological population in order to check whether they are similarly susceptible to these reconciliation errors as adults and to describe the characteristics of the patients who suffer them. METHODS: A 12-month prospective, multicentre study of medication reconciliation on admission in the pediatric onco-hematological population to assess the incidence of reconciliation errors and to describe the characteristics of the patients. RESULTS: Medication reconciliation was performed in 157 patients. At least a medication discrepancy was detected in 96 patients. Of the discrepancies detected, 52.1% were related to patient's new clinical situation or by the physician, while 48.9% were determined to be reconciliation errors. The most frequent type of reconciliation error was the "omission of a medication", followed by "a different dose, frequency or route of administration". A total of 77 pharmaceutical interventions were carried out, 94.2% of which were accepted. In the group of patients with a number equal to or greater than 4 drugs in home treatment, there was a 2.1-fold increase in the probability of suffering a reconciliation error. CONCLUSIONS: In order to avoid or reduce errors in one of the critical safety points such as transitions of care, there are measures such as medication reconciliation. In the case of complex chronic pediatric patients, such as onco-hematological patients, the number of drugs as part of home treatment is the variable that has been associated with the presence of medication reconciliation errors on admission to hospital, and the omission of some medication was the main cause of these errors.
Subject(s)
Medication Errors , Medication Reconciliation , Adult , Humans , Child , Prospective Studies , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Patient Admission , HospitalsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of reconciliation errors (RE) on admission to hospital in the paediatric onco-haematological population in order to check whether they are similarly susceptible to these RE as adults and to describe the characteristics of the patients who suffer them. METHODS: A 12-month prospective, multicentre study of medication reconciliation on admission in the paediatric onco-haematological population to assess the incidence of RE and describe the characteristics of the patients in whom they occur. RESULTS: Medication reconciliation was performed in 157 patients. At least 1 medication discrepancy was detected in 96 patients. Of the discrepancies detected, 52.1% were justified by the patient's new clinical situation or by the physician, while 48.9% were determined to be RE. The most frequent type of RE was the "omission of a medication", followed by "a different dose, frequency or route of administration". A total of 77 pharmaceutical interventions were carried out, 94.2% of which were accepted. In the group of patients with a number equal to or greater than 4 drugs in home treatment, there was a 2.1-fold increase in the probability of suffering a RE. CONCLUSIONS: In order to avoid or reduce errors in one of the critical safety points such as transitions of care, there are measures such as medication reconciliation. In the case of complex chronic paediatric patients, such as onco-haematological patients, the number of drugs as part of home treatment is the variable that has been associated with the presence of medication RE on admission to hospital, with the omission of some medication being the main cause of these errors.
Subject(s)
Medication Errors , Medication Reconciliation , Child , Humans , Hospitals , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Patient Admission , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Many medication errors occur during care transitions, which are critical points for patient safety. There is strong evidence in favour of medication reconciliation as a strategy to avoid errors in adults, though few studies have been made in the paediatric setting. Likewise, no recommendations have been established for the selection and/or prioritisation of paediatric patients amenable to reconciliation. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted involving patients subjected to reconciliation by a pharmacist on admission to hospital and who experienced at least one reconciliation error between January and November 2018. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify possible factors associated with reconciliation error, using a logistic regression model to determine the odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS: The group of patients with at least one reconciliation error included 334 patients, compared with the group of patients without reconciliation errors, which included 1426 patients. It was determined that schoolchildren and adolescent patients had a risk of presenting a reconciliation error on hospital admission that was more than double for younger patients (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.26 to 4.25, and OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.44 to 4.99, respectively). This risk was multiplied by five if we compared polymedicated patients versus non-polymedicated patients (OR 4.48, 95% CI 3.35 to 5.99). Patients with a neurological or onco-haematological underlying disease had a 12 and 10 times higher risk of presenting a reconciliation error compared with patients with other types of underlying diseases (OR 11.97, 95% CI 7.57 to 18.92, and OR 9.96, 95% CI 6.09 to 16.28, respectively). Finally, patients with narrow therapeutic index medicines in their usual treatment had an almost three times greater risk of presenting a reconciliation error when admitted to the hospital, although this last factor was not determined as an independent risk factor as for the others (OR 2.98, 95% CI 2.22 to 3.99). CONCLUSIONS: The paediatric population is characterised by a number of risk factors for reconciliation error. Knowledge of these factors can allow the prioritisation of medication reconciliation in a concrete group of patients. In order to generalise the results obtained in this study, they must be confirmed in other paediatric care settings involving larger samples and different types of patients.
ABSTRACT
Background The benefits of medication reconciliation are well established in adult patients, but not in paediatric patients, being a population not included in the guidelines for medication reconciliation published so far. However, it is known that a significant number of children suffer from chronic illnesses leading to a complex pharmacological treatment. Moreover, there are a series of specific factors that cause a greater risk of medication errors in children. Aim The purpose of the present study was to determine whether patients from a paediatric hospital setting may benefit from medication reconciliation at hospital admission, in order to prevent and reduce prescribing errors on admission. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the number of discrepancies between best possible medication history and prescribed treatment upon admission and, consequently, number of reconciliation errors. The secondary outcome was the main underlying disease with the highest number of reconciliation errors, and the main pharmacotherapeutic groups involved. Results The pharmacist reconciled the medication of 187 patients with an mean age of 6.6 ± 5.1 years. Sixty percent of patients had a base disease and 12.3% had polypharmacy, with an average of 6 drugs per patient. In a 42% of patients, at least one discrepancy was detected between their home treatment and the prescribed treatment upon admission, with 15% of patients having at least one reconciliation error (68% omissions). Neurological diseases were the main underlying disease with at least one reconciliation error (50%). The main pharmacotherapeutic groups involved in reconciliation errors were psychoanaleptic and psycholeptic, anti-acids, antiepileptic, and obstructive airway pharmacotherapy; each accounting for a 17.1%, 14.7%, 11.8% and 11.8% of the total, respectively. Conclusion Within our sample of paediatric patients, the rate of medication discrepancy and reconciliation errors at hospital admission was as relevant in terms of pharmacotherapy as has been reported in adults. The most frequent type of errors was omission of some home treatments. The main underlying disease with at least one error was neurological. As a whole, the detection of reconciliation errors in paediatrics by provision of medication reconciliation could be effective in reducing medication errors.
