Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Dig Dis Sci ; 64(6): 1604-1611, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30604370

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies examining the mortality risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have yielded conflicting results, and most do not account for recent advancements made in the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). We aim to assess the overall, premature, and cause-specific mortality in IBD patients over a 17-year time period and to evaluate any differences since the introduction of biologic therapy. METHODS: A death record case-control study was performed to explore the odds of premature death (before age 65) and all-cause mortality among those with IBD. Cases consisted of IBD patients (1,129 with CD and 841 with UC) who died in New York State (NYS) from 1993 to 2010. Controls (n = 7880) were matched 4:1 on the basis of sex and zip code from those who died in NYS in the same time frame, without an IBD diagnosis. RESULTS: Compared with matched controls, those with CD (OR 1.56, CI 95% 1.34-1.82), but not UC (OR 0.72, CI 95% 0.59-0.89), were more likely to die prematurely. Both those with UC and CD were more likely to die from a gastrointestinal cause (CD OR 15.28, 95% CI 12.11-19.27; UC OR 14.02, 95% CI 10.76-18.26). There was no difference in the cause or age of death before and after the introduction of anti-TNF agents in those with IBD. CONCLUSIONS: Both CD and UC cases were more likely to die of a gastrointestinal etiology, and CD patients were more likely to die prematurely. There was no significant difference in the premature death, average age of death, and cause of death in this IBD population after the availability of anti-TNF therapy.


Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative/mortality , Crohn Disease/mortality , Mortality, Premature/trends , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Case-Control Studies , Cause of Death/trends , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Databases, Factual , Death Certificates , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New York/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Time Factors
2.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 53(6): e214-e220, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29738352

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Obesity has been linked to suboptimal bowel preparation but this association has not been conclusively investigated in prospective studies. GOALS: Our objective was to determine whether any relationship exists between obesity as measured by body mass index (BMI) and quality of bowel preparation. STUDY: Adult patients who presented for outpatient colonoscopy at a single urban ambulatory surgery center within a 6-month period and fulfilled inclusion criteria were prospectively enrolled for the study. Patients were divided by BMI into subcategories based on the World Health Organization international classification of obesity. The Modified Aronchick scale was used to assess bowel preparation for colonoscopy. A univariate and multivariate analysis was used to determine a possible association between BMI and poor preparation. RESULTS: A total of 1429 patients were evaluated. On the basis of inclusion criteria, 1314 subjects were analyzed, out of which 73% were overweight or obese. Inadequate bowel preparation was noted in 21.1% of patients. There was no correlation between obesity and the quality of the bowel preparation. Male gender (P=0.002), diabetes mellitus (P<0.0001), liver cirrhosis (P=0.001), coronary artery disease (P=0.003), refractory constipation (P<0.0001), and current smoking (P=0.01) were found to be independently predictive of poor bowel preparation. CONCLUSIONS: Increased BMI is not predictive of suboptimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy. The results of our study are pivotal given the increased risk of colorectal cancer in obese patients and their known lower rate of colorectal cancer screening in certain populations. It is important to avoid subjecting these patients to an intensive bowel preparation that may further discourage screening in a patient population that requires it.


Subject(s)
Cathartics/administration & dosage , Colonoscopy/methods , Obesity/epidemiology , Overweight/epidemiology , Aged , Body Mass Index , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
5.
Cancer Causes Control ; 28(7): 779-789, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28573469

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Liver cancer (hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)) incidence and mortality rates are increasing in the United States. New York City (NYC) has a high burden of liver cancer risk factors, including hepatitis C (HCV) and hepatitis B (HBV) infection, which disproportionately affect persons of low socioeconomic position. Identifying neighborhoods with HCC disparities is essential to effectively define targeted cancer control strategies. METHODS: New York State Cancer Registry data from 1 January 2001 through 31 December 2012 were matched with NYC HCV and HBV surveillance data. HCC data were aggregated to NYC Zip Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs). Moran's I cluster analysis, Poisson regression, and geographically weighted Poisson regression were used to identify hotspots in HCC incidence and to examine the spatial associations with viral hepatitis rates, poverty, and uninsured status. RESULTS: Among NYC residents, 8,827 HCC cases were diagnosed during 2001-2012. Significant clustering was detected in the HCC rates (Moran's I = 0.25) with the strongest clustering found in HCC patients with comorbid HCV infection (Moran's I = 0.47). Poverty and uninsured status were associated (p < 0.05) with increased rates of HCC patients with HBV or HCV infection. Neighborhoods with high rates of HCC without viral hepatitis infection had lower rates of poverty and uninsured status. CONCLUSIONS: The geographic variation in HCC highlights the need for neighborhood-targeted interventions to address risk factors and barriers to care. The clusters of HCC by viral hepatitis status may serve as a basis for healthcare policymakers and practitioners to prioritize neighborhoods for cancer screening and control efforts.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/epidemiology , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , New York City/epidemiology , Residence Characteristics , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , United States
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 63(12): 1577-1583, 2016 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27585801

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The incidence and mortality rate of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are increasing in the United States. Viral hepatitis infection is a primary risk factor for HCC. This study describes the relationship between viral hepatitis and HCC in New York City (NYC). METHODS: Viral hepatitis cases reported to the NYC Department of Health from 1999-2012 were matched to HCC cases diagnosed from 2001 to 2012 and reported to the New York State Cancer Registry. HCC cases were stratified by the presence or absence of viral hepatitis. Demographic characteristics, factors associated with specific causes of death, and survival time were analyzed for all HCC cases. RESULTS: From 2001-2012, a total of 8827 NYC residents had HCC diagnosed; 38.4% had hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, 17.9% had hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, and 2.2% had both. Patients with HCC were predominantly men (74.8%), with equal proportions of white non-Hispanic (28.6%) and Hispanic (28.9%) patients. Those with HBV infection were primarily Asian/Pacific Islanders (63.2%). The median survival time after HCC diagnosis for persons with HBV infection was 22.3 months, compared with 13.1 months for persons with HCV infection, and 6.9 months for noninfected persons. The 5-year survival rate was 37.5% for those with HBV infection, 20.0% for those with HCV infection, 29.5% among coinfected individuals, and 16.1% for those with neither infection reported. CONCLUSIONS: In NYC, most persons with HCC have viral hepatitis; the majority of viral hepatitis infections are due to HCV. Survival for persons with HCC differs widely by viral hepatitis status. This study highlights the importance of viral hepatitis prevention and treatment and HCC screening.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/epidemiology , Hepatitis, Viral, Human/epidemiology , Aged , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/mortality , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/virology , Female , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis B/mortality , Hepatitis B/virology , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/mortality , Hepatitis C/virology , Hepatitis, Viral, Human/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New York City/epidemiology , Risk Assessment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...