Differences in Antihypertensive Medication Prescription Profiles Between 2009 and 2021: A Retrospective Cohort Study of CARTaGENE.

Background: Although blood pressure (BP) control is critical to prevent cardiovascular diseases, hypertension control rates in Canada are in decline. Objective: To assess this issue, we sought to evaluate the differences in antihypertensive medication prescription profiles in the province of Quebec between 2009 and 2021. Design: This is a retrospective cohort study. Setting: We used data from the CARTaGENE population-based cohort linked to administrative health databases. Patients: Participants with any drug claim in the 6 months prior to the end of follow-up were included. Measurements: Guideline-recommended antihypertensive drug prescription profiles were assessed at the time of enrollment (2009-2010) and end of follow-up (March 2021). Methods: Prescriptions practices from the 2 time periods were compared using Pearson's chi-square tests. A sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding participants in which antihypertensive drugs may not have been prescribed solely to treat hypertension (presence of atrial fibrillation/flutter, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, or migraines documented prior to or during follow-up). Results: Of 8447 participants included in the study, 31.4% and 51.3% filled prescriptions for antihypertensive drugs at the beginning and end of follow-up. In both study periods, guideline-recommended monotherapy was applied in most participants with hypertension (77.9% vs 79.5%, P = .3), whereas optimal 2 and 3-drug combinations were used less frequently (62.0% vs 61.4%, P = .77, 51.9% vs 46.7%, P = .066, respectively). Only the use of long-acting thiazide-like diuretics (9.5% vs 27.7%, P < .001) and spironolactone as a fourth-line agent (8.3% vs 15.9%, P = .054) increased with time but nonetheless remained infrequent. Results were similar in the sensitivity analysis. Limitations: Specific indication of the prescribed antihypertensive medications and follow-up BP data was not available. Conclusions: Application of hypertension guidelines for the choice of antihypertensive drugs remains suboptimal, highlighting the need for education initiatives. This may be an important step to raise BP control rates in Canada.

Contexte: Bien que le contrôle de la pression artérielle (PA) soit essentiel pour prévenir les maladies cardiovasculaires, les taux de maitrise de l'hypertension artérielle sont en déclin au Canada. Objectifs: Pour traiter cette problématique, nous avons cherché à évaluer les différences dans les profils de prescription de médicaments antihypertenseurs dans la province de Québec entre 2009 et 2021. Conception: Étude de cohorte rétrospective. Cadre: Nous avons utilisé les données de la cohorte populationnelle CARTaGENE reliées aux bases de données administratives en santé. Sujets: Ont été inclus les participants qui ont présenté une demande de remboursement de médicament dans les six mois précédant la fin du suivi. Mesures: Les profils de prescription de médicaments antihypertenseurs recommandés dans les lignes directrices ont été évalués au moment de l'inclusion (2009-2010) et à la fin du suivi (mars 2021). Méthodologie: Les profils de prescription des deux périodes ont été comparés à l'aide des tests Chi-Square de Pearson. Une analyse de sensibilité a été réalisée en excluant les participants pour lesquels les antihypertenseurs n'avaient possiblement pas été prescrits uniquement pour traiter l'hypertension (présence de fibrillation auriculaire, cardiopathie ischémique, insuffisance cardiaque, insuffisance rénale chronique ou migraines documentées avant ou pendant le suivi). Résultats: Des 8 447 participants inclus dans l'étude, 31,4 % avait rempli des prescriptions de médicaments antihypertenseurs au début du suivi et 51,3 % à la fin du suivi. Dans les deux périodes à l'étude, la monothérapie recommandée par les directives a été appliquée chez la plupart des participants avec hypertension artérielle (77,9 % c. 79,5 %; P = 0,3), tandis que les combinaisons optimales de deux médicaments (62,0 % c. 61,4 %; P = 0,77) et de trois médicaments (51,9 % c. 46,7 % P = 0,066) ont été utilisées moins fréquemment. Seules les utilisations de diurétiques thiazidiques à action prolongée (9,5 % c. 27,7 %; P < 0,001) et de spironolactone en quatrième intention (8,3 % c. 15,9 %; P = 0,054) ont augmenté avec le temps, mais sont demeurées néanmoins peu fréquentes. Les résultats étaient similaires dans l'analyse de sensibilité. Limites: L'indication précise pour la prescription de médicaments antihypertenseurs et les données de suivi sur la pression artérielle n'étaient pas disponibles. Conclusion: L'application des lignes directrices sur l'hypertension artérielle pour le choix des médicaments antihypertenseurs reste sous-optimale, ce qui souligne un besoin pour des initiatives en matière d'éducation. Cela pourrait constituer une étape importante d'une stratégie visant l'augmentation des taux de contrôle de la PA au Canada.

Suboptimal prenatal screening of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in a Montréal birthing and tertiary care centre: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The Canadian Paediatric Society no longer recommends the use of universal ocular prophylaxis with erythromycin ointment to prevent ophthalmia neonatorum. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in all pregnant women is considered the most effective way of preventing vertical transmission and ophthalmia neonatorum. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to assess prenatal screening rates of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae and to compare sociodemographic factors between those screened and those not screened. METHODS: The list of all women who delivered at a tertiary care hospital in Montréal, Québec, between April 2015 and March 2016, was cross-referenced with the list of samples tested for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae. Maternal medical records were reviewed for demographic, prenatal and diagnostic information. RESULTS: Of 2,688 mothers, 2,245 women were screened at least once, but only 2,206 women had at least one valid C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae result the day of delivery (82.1%; 95% CI: 80.6%-83.5%). Infection was detected in 46/2,206 (2.1%) screened women: 42 had C. trachomatis infection, two had N. gonorrhoeae infection and two were co-infected. C. trachomatis infection was more frequent in women younger than 25 years (9.8%; 95% CI: 6.7%-13.8%) than in older women (0.8%; 95% CI: 0.4%-1.3%; p<0.001). Each increase in parity decreased the probability of being tested (adjusted odds ratio=0.89; 95% CI: 0.80%-0.97%; p=0.01). Of those with an initial negative test result, 35/267 (13.1%; 95% CI: 9.3%-17.8%) of women younger than 25 years and 122/1,863 (6.6%; 95% CI: 5.5%-7.8%; p<0.001) of women aged 25 years and older were retested. Subsequent infection was detected in 4/35 (11%) women, all younger than 25. CONCLUSION: Suboptimal screening rates for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae suggest that current universal ocular prophylaxis cannot be discontinued. Repeating universal screening should be considered, especially among those younger than 25 years.

Telemedicine for housebound older persons during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Targeting older at-risk patients with decision-making algorithms is a priority at a time when hospitals are receiving an influx of Covid-19 patients that may exceed their capacity. Such screening could likely be extended to primary care settings in order to identify older community dwellers with Covid-19, but also those experiencing the adverse consequences of prolonged home confinement. The Centre of Excellence on Longevity of McGill University (Quebec, Canada) designed a short assessment for Montreal's housebound community-dwelling older adults. It acts as the first step in connecting older community dwellers who are housebound during the Covid-19 outbreak to telemedicine.