Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acta Paediatr ; 108(5): 865-869, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30307647

ABSTRACT

AIM: This study compared how non-invasive respiratory support (NRS) was provided in neonatal units in Italy and the UK. METHODS: An NRS questionnaire was sent to tertiary neonatal centres, identified by national societies, from November 2015 to May 2016. RESULTS: Responses were received from 49/57 (86%) UK units and 103/115 (90%) Italian units. NRS was started in the delivery room by 61% of UK units and 85% of Italian units. In neonatal intensive care units, 33% of UK units used nasal high-flow therapy (HFT) as primary support, compared to 3% in Italy. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was used in 57% of UK units and 90% of Italian units. The commonest starting flow rate on nasal HFT for term and preterm infants was 6 L/min in the UK, while Italian units mainly used this flow for term infants. In the UK, 67% of units decreased nasal HFT by 1 L/min per day. In Italy, infants on nasal CPAP were weaned by 1 cm H2 O per day in 39% of units. CONCLUSION: The way that NRS was managed for very preterm infants differed between the UK and Italy, reflecting a lack of evidence on optimal NRS and the use of local protocols.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care, Neonatal , Noninvasive Ventilation , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn/therapy , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Italy , Patient Selection , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...