Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 15(2): 185-91, 2005 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15695063

ABSTRACT

Increasing evidence has shown that the histaminergic neuron system is implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. The aim of this study was to compare the distribution of histamine H1 receptors between schizophrenics and normal human subjects in vivo using positron emission tomography (PET). H1 receptor binding was measured in 10 normal subjects and 10 medicated schizophrenic patients by PET and [11C] doxepin, a radioligand for the H1 receptor. The binding potential (BP=Bmax/K(D)) of [11C] doxepin for available brain H1 receptors was calculated by a graphical analysis on voxel-by-voxel basis and compared between schizophrenics and normal subjects using the regions of interest (ROIs) and the statistical parametrical mapping (SPM99). BP values for H1 receptors in the frontal and prefrontal cortices and the cingulate gyrus were significantly lower among the schizophrenic patients than among the control subjects. On the contrary, there were no areas of the brain where H1 receptors were significantly higher among the schizophrenic patients than the control subjects. The results of our study suggest that the central histaminergic neuron system could be involved in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia, although further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.


Subject(s)
Brain/metabolism , Positron-Emission Tomography/methods , Receptors, Histamine H1/metabolism , Schizophrenia/metabolism , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Brain/physiopathology , Doxepin/metabolism , Humans , Male , Protein Binding/physiology , Schizophrenia/physiopathology
2.
Eur J Pharmacol ; 505(1-3): 135-44, 2004 Nov 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15556146

ABSTRACT

Methamphetamine is a psychomotor stimulant, whereas first generation antihistamines cause sedation. Several studies have demonstrated that first generation antihistamines potentiate methamphetamine-induced psychomotor activation and two possible mechanisms have been postulated. One is blockage of the central histaminergic neuron system and the other is inhibition of dopamine reuptake. However, the exact mechanism is still controversial. In this study, we examined in behavioral tests the effects of selected antihistamines on methamphetamine-induced psychomotor activation in rats, and measured plasma and brain tissue concentrations of methamphetamine. We found that some antihistamines significantly potentiate methamphetamine-induced psychomotor activation in rats and that plasma and brain tissue concentrations of methamphetamine in rats treated with methamphetamine in combination with D-chlorpheniramine were markedly higher than those in rats treated with methamphetamine alone. These results suggest that the potentiating effects of antihistamines are due to not only central effects but also the alteration of the pharmacokinetics of methamphetamine.


Subject(s)
Behavior, Animal/drug effects , Histamine H1 Antagonists/pharmacology , Methamphetamine/pharmacology , Animals , Area Under Curve , Brain/metabolism , Central Nervous System Stimulants/blood , Central Nervous System Stimulants/pharmacokinetics , Central Nervous System Stimulants/pharmacology , Chlorpheniramine/pharmacology , Drug Interactions , Male , Methamphetamine/blood , Methamphetamine/pharmacokinetics , Motor Activity/drug effects , Neural Inhibition/drug effects , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Time Factors , Tissue Distribution
3.
Ann N Y Acad Sci ; 1025: 129-34, 2004 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15542709

ABSTRACT

The central histamine (HA) neurons that originate from the posterior hypothalamus modulate a variety of physiological functions. In order to investigate the roles of brain histaminergic neuron system in the behavioral effects of methamphetamine (METH), we administrated METH repeatedly to L-histidine decarboxylase (HDC)-, histamine H1 receptor-, H2 receptor-gene knockout (KO) mice, H1/H2 receptor-gene double KO mice, and wild type (WT) mice corresponding to each of them, and we measured locomotor activities. We also measured the contents of monoamines and amino acids in the brain of HDC-gene KO and WT mice after a single administration of METH. METH-induced locomotor hyperactivity and the development of behavioral sensitization were facilitated more in the HDC-gene KO mice and H1/H2 gene double KO mice than the WT mice, suggesting that brain histamine has an inhibitory effect on the METH action through both H1 and H2 receptors. In addition, neurochemical study suggested the involvement of the GABAergic neuron system in the inhibitory effect of brain histamine.


Subject(s)
Brain/drug effects , Histamine/deficiency , Methamphetamine/pharmacology , Animals , Brain/metabolism , Histamine/genetics , Mice , Mice, Knockout , Motor Activity/drug effects , Motor Activity/physiology , Receptors, Histamine H1/deficiency , Receptors, Histamine H1/genetics , Receptors, Histamine H2/deficiency , Receptors, Histamine H2/genetics
4.
Ann N Y Acad Sci ; 1025: 257-66, 2004 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15542725

ABSTRACT

Repeated administration of methamphetamine (METH) causes reverse tolerance or behavioral sensitization in mice. However, the effects of social isolation stress on the METH-caused reverse tolerance have not been studied until now. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of social isolation stress on METH-caused reverse tolerance by examining the prepulse inhibition of startle response (PPI). PPI was tested in socially isolated and grouped mice after repeated METH injections. Locomotor activity and PPI were also examined just after a four-week isolation rearing period as a control experiment. After completing behavioral experiments, the mice were sacrificed, and the contents of monoamines, including histamine in the brain, were measured. Social isolation stress significantly lowered the locomotion and disrupted PPI. Repeated injections of METH enhanced the effects of social isolation on PPI. The content of dopamine and histamine significantly increased in the cortex, and the turnover rate of dopamine decreased significantly. These findings demonstrate that social isolation stress significantly enhances METH-induced behavioral sensitization and that the altered histaminergic neuron system might play an important role in METH-induced behavioral sensitization in addition to dopaminergic and serotoninergic neurotransmission. Our data suggest that social isolation is involved in the development of METH-induced psychosis, schizophrenia, and other related psychiatric disorders.


Subject(s)
Methamphetamine/administration & dosage , Reflex, Startle/drug effects , Social Isolation/psychology , Stress, Physiological/psychology , Animals , Locomotion/drug effects , Locomotion/physiology , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Reflex, Startle/physiology
5.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 44(8): 890-900, 2004 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15286093

ABSTRACT

Histamine H1-receptor (H1R) antagonists, or antihistamines, often induce sedative side effects when used for the treatment of allergic disorders. This study compared the sedative profiles of the second-generation antihistamines, fexofenadine and cetirizine, using 3 different criteria: subjective sleepiness evaluated by the Stanford Sleepiness Scale, objective psychomotor tests (simple and choice reaction time tests and visual discrimination tests at 4 different exposure durations), and measurement of histamine H1-receptor occupancy (H1RO) in the brain. Subjective sleepiness and psychomotor performance were measured in 20 healthy Japanese volunteers at baseline and 90 min after administration of fexofenadine 120 mg or cetirizine 20 mg in a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Hydroxyzine 30 mg was included as a positive control. H1RO was measured using positron emission tomography (PET) with (11)C-doxepin in 12 of the 20 subjects, and a further 11 volunteers were recruited to act as controls. In psychomotor tests, fexofenadine was not significantly different from placebo and significantly less impairing than cetirizine on some tasks, as well as significantly less impairing than hydroxyzine on all tasks. For subjective sleepiness, fexofenadine was not significantly different from placebo, whereas cetirizine showed a trend toward increased sleepiness compared with fexofenadine and placebo. H1RO was negligible with fexofenadine (-0.1%) but moderately high with cetirizine (26.0%). In conclusion, fexofenadine 120 mg is distinguishable from cetirizine 20 mg, as assessed by H1RO and psychomotor testing.


Subject(s)
Brain/drug effects , Cetirizine/pharmacology , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/pharmacology , Histamine H1 Antagonists/pharmacology , Receptors, Histamine H1/metabolism , Terfenadine/analogs & derivatives , Terfenadine/pharmacology , Adult , Brain/metabolism , Carbon Radioisotopes , Cetirizine/pharmacokinetics , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Doxepin , Histamine H1 Antagonists/pharmacokinetics , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Male , Positron-Emission Tomography , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Psychomotor Performance/drug effects , Sleep Stages/drug effects , Terfenadine/pharmacokinetics
6.
Life Sci ; 72(4-5): 409-14, 2002 Dec 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12467881

ABSTRACT

Brain histamine is involved in a wide range of physiological functions such as regulation of the sleep-wake cycle, arousal, cognition, and memory mainly through interactions with histamine H1 receptors (H1Rs). Neurons producing histamine, histaminergic neurons, are exclusively located in the posterior hypothalamus and transmit histamine to almost all regions of the brain. Histamine H1 antagonists, or antihistamines, often prescribed for treatment of allergic disorders, sometimes induce sleepiness and cognitive deficits. It is understood that the mechanism of such CNS side effects is that antihistamine blocks H1Rs in the brain. The purpose of the present study was to compare the CNS side effects of different antihistamines. Subjective sleepiness was measured using the Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS) and psychomotor performance was examined by a tachistoscope testing system in healthy, young, Japanese volunteers (16 males, 20-28 yrs.) before and after oral administration of antihistamines such as fexofenadine (FEX) and cetirizine (CET). Additionally, H1R occupancy by antihistamines was examined by PET with 11C-doxepin in 8 volunteers. The results of SSS and psychomotor tests demonstrated that FEX tended to be less sedative than CET though the difference was not statistically significant. PET measurements revealed that no H1Rs in the cerebral cortex were occupied by FEX while about 30% of H1Rs were occupied by CET. In summary, it was confirmed that histamine and H1Rs are involved in maintaining arousal and cognition in humans, and that the severity of clinical symptoms is correlated to the amount of antihistamine that penetrated into the brain.


Subject(s)
Arousal/physiology , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Cognition/physiology , Histamine/physiology , Receptors, Histamine H1/metabolism , Terfenadine/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Brain Chemistry , Cetirizine/pharmacology , Cross-Over Studies , Discrimination, Psychological/physiology , Double-Blind Method , Doxepin , Female , Histamine H1 Antagonists/pharmacology , Humans , Male , Psychomotor Performance/drug effects , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Radiopharmaceuticals , Reaction Time/physiology , Sleep Stages/drug effects , Terfenadine/pharmacology , Tomography, Emission-Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...