Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Langmuir ; 40(11): 5850-5857, 2024 Mar 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38437621

ABSTRACT

The separation of propane and propylene is the most energy-consuming and difficult separation process in the petrochemical industry because of their extremely similar physical properties. Separating propylene from propane using sorption can considerably reduce the energy consumed by current cryogenic distillation techniques. However, sorption involves several major challenges. An elastic layer-structured metal-organic framework (ELM-11) exhibited a highly efficient propane/propylene sorption separation, owing to its kinetic properties. Under equilibrium conditions, propane and propylene exhibited similar sorption capacities, gate opening pressures, and heats of sorption. Thus, their separation under equilibrium conditions is impractical. However, the sorption rates of the two gases were considerably different, showing different diffusion coefficients, resulting in a high kinetic selectivity (214 at 298 K) of propylene over propane on ELM-11. This kinetic selectivity is considerably higher than those obtained in previous studies. Thus, ELM-11 is a promising sorbent for separation technologies.

2.
PLoS One ; 17(11): e0276483, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36395333

ABSTRACT

The aim of this preliminary study was to measure the systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) and heart rate (HR) of radiological technologists by WD, and evaluate variation among individuals by worktime, day of the week, job, and workplace. Measurements were obtained using a wristwatch-type WD with optical measurement technology that can measure SBP and DBP every 10 minutes and HR every 30 minutes. SBP, DBP, and HR data obtained at baseline and during work time were combined with the hours of work, day of the week, job, and workplace recorded by the participants in 8 consecutive weeks. We calculated the mean, the ratio to baseline and coefficient of variation [CV(%)] for SBP, DBP, and HR. SBP, DBP, and HR values were significantly higher during work hours than at baseline (p<0.03). The ratio to baseline values ranged from 1.02 to 1.26 for SBP and from 1.07 to 1.30 for DBP. The ratio to baseline for SBP and DBP showed CV(%) of approximately 10% according to the day of the week and over the study period. For HR, ratio to baseline ranged from 0.95 to 1.29. The ratio of mean BP to baseline was >1.2 at the time of starting work, middle and after lunch, and at 14:00. The ratio to baseline of SBP were 1.2 or more for irradiation, equipment accuracy control, registration of patient data, dose verification and conference time, and were also working in CT examination room, treatment planning room, linac room, and the office. CV(%) of BP and HR were generally stable for all workplaces. WD measurements of SBP, DBP, and HR were higher during working hours than at baseline and varied by the individuals, work time, job, and workplace. This method may enable evaluation of unconscious workload in individuals.


Subject(s)
Hypertension , Wearable Electronic Devices , Humans , Blood Pressure/physiology , Heart Rate/physiology , Blood Pressure Determination/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...