Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
2.
J Gerontol Nurs ; 33(1): 21-9; quiz 30-1, 2007 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17305266

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency with which over-the-counter and prescription medications with potential anticholinergic side effects were used by a sample of 193 older adults with memory problems. Medications with anticholinergic side effects are contraindicated in this population because they can worsen memory impairment and increase confusion. A retrospective chart review of clients seen between October 1999 and April 2004 was completed, with a secondary analysis of the medications older adults (older than 50 years) were taking at their initial clinic visit. Findings revealed that 10.3% of these older adults were consuming one or more medications with anticholinergic side effects. These findings demonstrate an ongoing opportunity for nurses to educate health care providers, as well as consumers, regarding the dangers of these medications.


Subject(s)
Cholinergic Antagonists , Drug Prescriptions , Memory Disorders , Nonprescription Drugs , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Cholinergic Antagonists/adverse effects , Confusion/chemically induced , Contraindications , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Female , Geriatric Assessment , Geriatric Nursing , Humans , Male , Memory Disorders/complications , Memory Disorders/diagnosis , Memory Disorders/nursing , Mental Status Schedule , Middle Aged , Nonprescription Drugs/adverse effects , Nonprescription Drugs/therapeutic use , Nurse's Role , Ohio , Patient Education as Topic , Polypharmacy , Residence Characteristics , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Self Medication/adverse effects , Self Medication/statistics & numerical data
3.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 6(6): 375-82, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16286058

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe practice patterns regarding diabetes management among nursing home (NH) physicians and to identify variation in this practice based on patient characteristics. DESIGN: Mailed survey. PARTICIPANTS: Nursing home physicians from the American Medical Directors Association (AMDA) Foundation Long-Term Care Research Network (n = 142), as well as other members of AMDA who were Certified Medical Directors (CMD) (n = 68) and members who were not CMD certified (n = 45). Response rates to the survey were 51%, 33%, and 23%, respectively. MEASUREMENTS: Physician and facility characteristics were queried. Responses to 12 items pertaining to diabetes management and 5 items pertaining to use of specific oral diabetes medications were evaluated in the context of 3 different patient profiles that reflected different combinations of functional and cognitive impairment. Responses were based on the physicians' perception of how they manage diabetes under these specified patient profiles. RESULTS: Responses from members of the Research Network indicated highly significant variability (P < .01) between the 3 patient profiles for all of the 12 management items. Ordering a special diet, monitoring lipid panel, and ordering routine ophthalmology was less likely for the patient profile with both functional and cognitive impairment (P < .01). These differences among the patient profiles for these 3 interventions were present in the responses from all 3 categories of physicians (Research Network, CMD, and non-CMD members of AMDA). There was no statistically significant variability among the 3 patient profiles for any of the 3 physician groups regarding the likelihood of using of any of the 5 classes of oral diabetic medications. Non-CMD physicians were more likely to have less NH experience; otherwise, there were no differences among the 3 physician groups. CONCLUSIONS: Nursing home physicians appear to alter the approach to diabetes management based on the functional and/or cognitive status of the patient. This was particularly true for those physicians who were members of the AMDA Foundation Research Network. These findings have implications for initiatives designed to guide clinical practice as well as efforts by regulatory bodies to evaluate appropriate care. Further research is needed to measure the actual impact of different approaches to diabetes management on relevant outcomes in this population.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Geriatrics/methods , Nursing Homes , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Attitude of Health Personnel , Blood Glucose/analysis , Cognition Disorders/epidemiology , Diabetes Complications/prevention & control , Diabetes Complications/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Long-Term Care , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 58(4): 414-20, 2005 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15862728

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Correlations between probabilities of resistance and the frequencies with which antibiotics were prescribed for treating bacterial respiratory infections were examined in a nationwide ambulatory population. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The data of a nationwide probability sample survey of visits to physician offices in the United States in 1999 were used to conduct this study of drug use. A clinical pharmacologist identified antibiotics prescribed during those visits using a large online database. The participating physicians diagnosed the bacterial respiratory infections. An infectious disease expert determined the probabilities of bacterial resistance from a nationwide antibiotic surveillance database. RESULTS: Various bacterial respiratory infections were diagnosed during 6.5% of physician office visits in 1999. One or more antibiotics were prescribed during 51.0% of those visits. The probabilities of resistance to the most frequently prescribed antibiotics varied from 20% to 40% and showed a weak positive correlation with the frequencies of antibiotic prescriptions. CONCLUSION: A significant number of inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions were issued for infections with a high probability of bacterial resistance to the prescribed antibiotics.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/methods , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Health Care Surveys/methods , Medication Errors/statistics & numerical data , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Amoxicillin/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Physicians' Offices , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Sex Distribution , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...