Use of the Tissue Common Rejection Module Score in Kidney Transplant as an Objective Measure of Allograft Inflammation.

Long-term kidney transplant (KT) allograft outcomes have not improved as expected despite a better understanding of rejection and improved immunosuppression. Previous work had validated a computed rejection score, the tissue common rejection module (tCRM), measured by amplification-based assessment of 11 genes from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) biopsy specimens, which allows for quantitative, unbiased assessment of immune injury. We applied tCRM in a prospective trial of 124 KT recipients, and contrasted assessment by tCRM and histology reads from 2 independent pathologists on protocol and cause biopsies post-transplant. Four 10-µm shaves from FFPE biopsy specimens were used for RNA extraction and amplification by qPCR of the 11 tCRM genes, from which the tCRM score was calculated. Biopsy diagnoses of either acute rejection (AR) or borderline rejection (BL) were considered to have inflammation present, while stable biopsies had no inflammation. Of the 77 biopsies that were read by both pathologists, a total of 40 mismatches in the diagnosis were present. The median tCRM scores for AR, BL, and stable diagnoses were 4.87, 1.85, and 1.27, respectively, with an overall significant difference among all histologic groups (Kruskal-Wallis, p < 0.0001). There were significant differences in tCRM scores between pathologists both finding inflammation vs. disagreement (p = 0.003), and both finding inflammation vs. both finding no inflammation (p < 0.001), along with overall significance between all scores (Kruskal-Wallis, p < 0.001). A logistic regression model predicting graft inflammation using various clinical predictor variables and tCRM revealed the tCRM score as the only significant predictor of graft inflammation (OR: 1.90, 95% CI: 1.40-2.68, p < 0.0001). Accurate, quantitative, and unbiased assessment of rejection of the clinical sample is critical. Given the discrepant diagnoses between pathologists on the same samples, individuals could utilize the tCRM score as a tiebreaker in unclear situations. We propose that the tCRM quantitative score can provide unbiased quantification of graft inflammation, and its rapid evaluation by PCR on the FFPE shave can become a critical adjunct to help drive clinical decision making and immunosuppression delivery.

Graft immunologic events in deceased donor kidney transplant recipients with preformed HLA-donor specific antibodies.

INTRODUCTION: Pretransplant donor-specific HLA alloantibodies detected with the Single Antigen Bead (SAB) assay reflect an increased risk for acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). We herein report the incidence of both acute AMR and acute cellular rejection (ACR) during the first year posttransplantation, in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients (KTR) of deceased donor (DD) grafts, according to their DSA status. Pretransplant DSA do not preclude DD-KT in negative CDC-XM recipients at our center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 246 KT were performed at our center between 01/2012 and 12/2015 and 100 KTR obtained from a DD were analyzed; 24% harbored DSA by SAB assay, MFI values >500 were considered positive. All recipients received thymoglobulin induction and generic tacrolimus-based maintenance therapy. Graft biopsies were performed by protocol on months 3 and 12 as well as per indication. The incidence of AMR and ACR was correlated with the existence of pretransplant DSA. RESULTS: Overall, 34% of patients developed an acute rejection episode, 54.2% in the DSA group versus 27.6% in the non-DSA group (p=0.032), and most of these events were detected as subclinical conditions in protocol biopsies. AMR events developed in 33.3% and 19.7% (p=0.176) in the DSA and the non-DSA groups, respectively. ACR events were found in 16.6% and 6.6% (p=0.127) in the DSA and non-DSA groups, respectively. Graft function was similar between groups at the end of the 1st year posttransplant and no immunological graft loss occurred. CONCLUSION: Despite the use of depleting induction therapy and adequate tacrolimus trough levels along with MMF and steroids, a high rate of rejection events was observed during the first year post-transplantation.