Comparison of the RIFLE, AKIN, and KDIGO Diagnostic Classifications for Acute Renal Injury in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and peri-operative risk factors for acute renal injury (ARI) and their relationship with mortality rate through the use of 3 different ARI diagnostic classifications in patients after liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: We retrospectively investigated the medical records of adult LT recipients. Post-operative ARI was determined with the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End-Stage Renal Failure (RIFLE), Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN), and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) classifications. RESULTS: We analyzed 440 adult patients. The post-operative incidence of ARI was 8.0% by the RIFLE classification, 14.31% by the AKIN classification, and 14.54% by the KDIGO classification. Significant risk factors for ARI were pre-operative albumin (odds ratio [OR], 0.776; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.473-1.273 for AKIN; and OR, 0.724; 95% CI, 0.444-1.182 for KDIGO) and hemoglobin levels (OR, 2.830; 95% CI, 1.157-6.9261 by RIFLE), intra-operative red blood cell transfusion (OR, 1.072; 95% CI, 1.004-1.143 by AKIN; and OR, 1.077; 95% CI, 1.011-1.147 by KDIGO), and blood loss (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.999-1.000 by RIFLE). The early mortality rate was 7.9% in our series. CONCLUSIONS: The RIFLE, AKIN, and KDIGO ARI classifications classify the severity of renal dysfunction in patients who have undergone LT. Direct associations were found between higher mortality rates and severity of renal disease.

Acute Renal Injury Evaluation After Liver Transplantation: With RIFLE Criteria.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to identify acute renal injury (ARI) through the use of RIFLE (risk, injury, failure, loss, end-stage kidney disease) criteria and to investigate perioperative risk factors for ARI in liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: We reviewed medical records of adult LT patients retrospectively. Postoperative ARI was staged with RIFLE criteria by the 1st and 7th days of the surgery. RESULTS: We analyzed 440 adult LT patients, categorized as risk (R), injury (I), or failure (F) according to the RIFLE criteria. In this study, in the first postoperative day, incidence of ARI was 7.95%; all of them were R-class, and, on the 7th day, the incidence of ARI was 7.27%, as R-class 6.59% and I-class 0.68%. Significant risk factors were detected within the first postoperative day including pre-operative hemoglobin levels <9 g/dL (P = .019), intra-operative transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) (P = .049) and fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) (P = .049), blood loss (P = .011), and post-reperfusion syndrome (P = .023). Multivariate analysis revealed risk factors for ARI as RBCs (odds ratio [OR], 1.049; P = .247) and FFP (OR, 1.017; P = .627) transfusion and blood loss (OR, 1.000; P = .021) (blood loss OR: 0.9996952300184; 95% confidence interval: 0.9994356774026 to 0.999548500399). The only significant risk factor for the 7th postoperative day was the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (>20) (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that RBC and FFP transfusion, perioperative blood loss, and MELD score >20 are risk factors for LT-related ARI. Also normalization of hemoglobin levels with non-blood products in patients with preoperative low hemoglobin levels can diminish the need for RBC and that can prevent ARI.

The Soft Seal disposable laryngeal mask airway in adults: comparison of two insertion techniques without intra-oral manipulation.

We investigated whether insertion of the disposable Soft Seal laryngeal mask airway (SSLM) was successful without intra-oral digital manipulation. One hundred patients undergoing anaesthesia using the SSLM were randomly assigned into two groups. Insertion was performed by either a direct or a rotational technique, both without intra-oral digital manipulation. The primary outcome measure was successful insertion at first attempt. Other outcomes included insertion time, fibreoptic assessment of the airway view and airway morbidity. The first attempt success rate was higher (98%) with the direct technique than with the rotational technique (75%; p = 0.002) but insertion time was faster with the latter method (mean [range] 15 [8-50] s) than with the direct method (20 [8-56] s; p = 0.035). Fibreoptic assessment and airway morbidity were similar in both groups. We conclude that the SSLM can be successfully inserted without intra-oral digital manipulation.

Practices of anaesthesiologists with regard to withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill in Turkey.

BACKGROUND: To determine practices of Turkish anaesthesiologists with regard to withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire consisting of 18 questions was mailed to 439 members of the Turkish Society of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation. RESULTS: Three hundred and 69 questionnaires were returned (84% response). Over 90% of the respondents indicated that they were Muslim. We found that 66% of respondents had initiated written or oral do-not-resuscitate orders, most frequently after discussion with colleagues (82%). CONCLUSIONS: While a number of similarities were found between Turkish anaesthesiologists and those from other countries, some specific differences could be identified, particularly related to consensus decision-making and sharing information with other providers and the value of Ethics Committees in the decision-making process.

Comparison of sedation requirements for cataract surgery under topical anesthesia or retrobulbar block.

PURPOSE: Topical anesthesia is increasingly being used for cataract surgery. However, it is believed that topical anesthesia causes an increased risk of intraoperative complications from unrestricted eye movement and insufficient pain control and more need for sedation. It is difficult to compare pain and anxiety experienced by individual patients; therefore, the authors used the method of patient-controlled sedation to determine whether there is a difference in sedation requirements under topical or retrobulbar anesthesia. METHODS: In this prospective study, patients received either topical anesthesia (n=87) or retrobulbar block (n=104) and self-administered a mixture of midazolam (0.5 mg) and fentanyl (25 microg) in increments using a patient controlled analgesia infuser to achieve sedation. At the end of surgery, patients rated their pain on a 10-point numerical rating scale and their comfort on a 5-point scale. The number of demands and deliveries were noted from the patient controlled analgesia infuser display. RESULTS: Pain scores were between 0 and 2 in 95.4% in the topical and in 94.2% in the retrobulbar group (p>0.05). Patient comfort was equal in both groups with 2.94+/-0.92 in the topical group and 2.92+/-0.99 in the retrobulbar group (p>0.05). Mean sedation requirements were similar in both groups: 26.4% of patients in the topical group and 19.2% in the retrobulbar group did not request any sedation (not significant, p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sedation requirements were similar for cataract surgery under topical and retrobulbar anesthesia.