Placental abnormalities differ in small for gestational age neonates in relation to their prenatal sonographic abdominal circumference measurements.

BACKGROUND: Antenatal detection of abdominal circumference (AC) <10th percentile, among small for gestational age (SGA) neonates, probably reflects the severity of their growth restriction. We aimed to study neonatal outcome and placental pathology among SGA neonates in correlation to their AC measurements. METHODS: Maternal and neonatal computerized medical records and placental histopathology reports of all SGA neonates, (neonatal birth-weight ≤10th percentile), born between 24 and 42 weeks, during 2015-2018 were reviewed. Included cases with fetal biometric measurements conducted up to 7 days prior labor. Results were compared between cases with sonographic antenatal AC <10th percentile and neonates with sonographic antenatal AC ≥10th percentile. Placental lesions were classified according to "Amsterdam" Placental workshop criteria. RESULTS: The AC <10th percentile group (n = 148) was characterized by higher rate of nulliparity (p = .003), and induction of labor (p = .009), as compared to the AC ≥10th percentile group (n = 41). There were no between groups differences in the rate of maternal BMI (kg/m2), hypertensive disorders, diabetes or smoking. Neonatal hypoglycemia was more common in the AC <10th percentile group as compared to the AC ≥10th percentile group (p = .04). Placentas from the AC <10th percentile group were smaller (p < .001), with more MVM lesions (p = .02) and chronic villitis (p = .04). By multivariate regression analysis, AC <10th percentile and maternal hypertensive disorders, were found to be independently associated with placental MVM lesions, aOR = 2.43 (95% CI 1.04, 5.88) and aOR = 3.15 (95% CI 1.06, 9.31), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Higher rate of placental maternal malperfusion lesions, chronic villitis, and more neonatal hypoglycemia characterize SGA neonates with AC <10th percentile, pointing to the importance of AC measurement as an indicator for placental insufficiency.

Reduced fetal movements is twin pregnancies and the association with adverse neonatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Reduced fetal movements (RFM) is an obstetric complaint known to be associated with adverse neonatal outcomes and should serve as an alarming sign in obstetric triage. Whether this assumption holds for twin pregnancies, is still an obstetric enigma, and this complaint is sometimes overlooked in twins. We, therefore, aimed to study neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancies complicated by RFM. We hypothesised that in twin pregnancy, maternal ability to perceive RFM will be limited, and therefore, will not be associated with adverse neonatal outcome. STUDY DESIGN: Included were all dichorionic twin pregnancies between 2009-2019 who presented to our obstetric triage at a gestational age >34 weeks with an isolated complaint of RFM and delivered during the subsequent two weeks (RFM group). The control group included patients with twin pregnancies (matched for gestational age and maternal age) who presented for routine assessment and reported regular fetal movements throughout pregnancy (no RFM group). Data regarding pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes were compared between the groups. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes, which included one or more of the following: neonatal hypoglycemia, respiratory morbidity, cerebral morbidity, phototherapy, neonatal sepsis, blood transfusions, necrotizing enterocolitis, or neonatal death. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify independent associations with adverse neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: Maternal demographics and gestational age at delivery did not differ between the RFM group (n = 83 pregnancies and 166 neonates) and the no RFM group (n = 83 pregnancies and 166 neonates). Neonatal birthweights, as well as the rate of birthweights <10th centile, did not differ between the groups. There were 2 cases of fetal demise diagnosed at triage in the RFM group. The rate of the primary outcome, as well as NICU admissions, were significantly higher in the RFM group compared to the no RFM group (29.5 % vs. 19.2 %, p = 0.01 and 32.5 % vs. 19.2 %, p = 0.001). In multivariable analysis RFM (aOR = 1.18, 95 % CI = 1.06-2.73), and GA at delivery (aOR = 0.88, 95 % CI = 0.67-0.97) were associated with adverse neonatal outcome-independent from background confounders. CONCLUSION: Patients presented to obstetric triage with twin pregnancies and isolated RFM had higher rates of adverse neonatal outcomes and NICU admissions compared to twin pregnancies without RFM.

Reduced fetal movements at term in singleton low risk pregnancies-Is there an association with placental histopathological findings?

INTRODUCTION: Maternal perception of fetal movements has long been considered an indicator of fetal well-being. A sudden decrease in the number of fetal movements is suggestive of fetal compromise. We aimed to determine whether the maternal perception of reduced fetal movements (RFM) is associated with placental pathological lesions in a low-risk term population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our study was a case-control study that was performed in a single university center. Placental histopathology, maternal demographics, labor characteristics, and neonatal outcomes of term, singleton pregnancies with maternal perception of RFM during the 2 weeks prior to delivery were collected. To isolate the effect of RFM on placental pathology, we excluded cases complicated by preterm birth, hypertensive disorders, diabetes mellitus, small-for-gestational-age and congenital/genetic anomalies. We compared pregnancy outcomes and placental pathology between the RFM group and a control group matched for gestational age and mode of delivery. Placental lesions were classified according to the "Amsterdam" criteria. Composite adverse neonatal outcome was defined as one or more of the following: sepsis, transfusion, hypoglycemia, phototherapy, respiratory morbidity, cerebral morbidity, necrotizing enterocolitis and fetal/neonatal death. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify independent associations with adverse neonatal outcome. RESULTS: We included patients who gave birth from January 2008 until May 2019. The study group included 203 term pregnancies with RFM during the 2 weeks prior to delivery, which was matched with 203 controls. The RFM group was characterized by a higher rate of placental weight <10th percentile (22.6% vs. 3.9%, P < .001), a higher rate of maternal vascular malperfusion lesions (30.5% vs. 18.7%, P = .007) and lesions of maternal inflammatory response (43.3% vs. 29.5%, P = .005). At delivery, the RFM group had higher rates of cesarean delivery due to non-reassuring fetal heart rate monitoring (P = .01), 5-minute Apgar score ≤7 (P = .03), neonatal intensive care unit admissions (P < .001) and composite adverse neonatal outcomes (P = .007). Using multivariable analysis, RFM (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-4.8), and placental maternal vascular malperfusion lesions (aOR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0-2.9) were independently associated with adverse neonatal outcome. CONCLUSIONS: After excluding important placental-related morbidities, RFM was associated with a higher rate of placental weight <10th percentile and placental maternal vascular malperfusion lesions vs. controls. This study suggests a placental involvement in the association between RFM at term and adverse pregnancy outcomes.