Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 33
Filter
1.
J Diabetes Investig ; 2024 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38712947

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The utilization of long-term effect of internet of things (IoT) on glycemic control is controversial. This trial aimed to examine the effect of an IoT-based approach for type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial enrolled 1,159 adults aged 20-74 years with type 2 diabetes with a HbA1c of 6.0-8.9% (42-74 mmol/mol), who were using a smartphone on a daily basis were randomly assigned to either the IoT-based approach group (ITG) or the control group (CTG). The ITG were supervised to utilize an IoT automated system that demonstrates a summary of lifelogging data (weight, blood pressure, and physical activities) and provides feedback messages that promote behavioral changes in both diet and exercise. The primary end point was a HbA1c change over 52 weeks. RESULTS: Among the patients, 581 were assigned to the ITG and 578 were in the CTG. The changes in HbA1c from baseline to the final measurement at 52 weeks [mean (standard deviation)] were -0.000 (0.6225)% in ITG and - 0.006 (0.6449)% in CTG, respectively (P = 0.8766). In the per protocol set, including ITG using the IoT system almost daily and CTG, excluding those using the application almost daily, the difference in HbA1c from baseline to 52 weeks were -0.098 (0.579)% and 0.027 (0.571)%, respectively (P = 0.0201). We observed no significant difference in the adverse event profile between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The IoT-based approach did not reduce HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes. IoT-based intervention using data on the daily glycemic control and HbA1c level may be required to improve glycemic control.

2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 849, 2023 Dec 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38049729

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections has led to the development of several therapeutic agents, with tocilizumab becoming increasingly used to treat patients with COVID-19-related pneumonia. This study compared the use of tocilizumab treatment with the standard of care (SOC) to determine its efficacy against severe COVID-19-related pneumonia in Japan. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of tocilizumab in two different databases: the JA42434 single-arm study and COVID-19 Registry Japan (COVIREGI-JP), with a synthetic control group from the COVIREGI-JP cohort as a benchmark for the tocilizumab group. The study's primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of tocilizumab in treating severe COVID-19-related pneumonia compared to the SOC among patients included in the above two databases. The SOC group was extracted as the synthetic control group using exact matching and a propensity score matching in sequence per subject. As a secondary objective, the efficacy of tocilizumab compared to the SOC was evaluated exclusively among patients included in the COVIREGI-JP database. In each objective, the primary endpoint was defined as the time to discharge or the status of awaiting discharge. RESULTS: For the primary endpoint, the hazard ratio (HR) of the tocilizumab group against the SOC group was 1.070 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.565-2.028). The median time from Study Day 1 to discharge or the state of awaiting discharge was 15 days in the tocilizumab group and 16 days in the SOC group. The HRs for the secondary endpoints, namely, time to improvement in the clinical state, time to clinical failure, and time to recovery, were 1.112 (95% CI: 0.596-2.075), 0.628 (95% CI: 0.202-1.953), and 1.019 (95% CI: 0.555-1.871), respectively. Similarly, the HR of the primary endpoint for the secondary objective was 0.846 (95% CI: 0.582-1.230). CONCLUSIONS: Tocilizumab did not demonstrate a positive effect on time to discharge or the state of awaiting discharge. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences in other clinical outcomes, such as time to improvement in the clinical state, time to clinical failure, and time to recovery, were observed among the groups.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Retrospective Studies , Routinely Collected Health Data , Treatment Outcome , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
3.
Diabetol Int ; 14(3): 272-279, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37397898

ABSTRACT

Aims: We aimed to estimate the causes of death and their incidence rates and risk factors for all-cause mortality in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes using baseline data from the Japan Diabetes Complication and its Prevention (JDCP) prospective study. Methods: We analyzed a multicenter prospective cohort of 5944 Japanese people with diabetes aged 40-74 years. Causes of death were categorized as cardiac or cerebrovascular disease, malignancy, infectious disease, accident or suicide, sudden death of unknown cause, and other unknown causes. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratio of all-cause mortality risk factors. Results: The mean age was 61.4 years, and 39.9% of the population was female. Overall, the mortality ratio per 100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 515.3 (95% CI 445.1-596.9). Malignancies are the most common cause of death among people with type 2 diabetes, accounting for 46.9% of all deaths, followed by cardiac and cerebrovascular diseases at 11.7% and infectious diseases at 3.9%. Higher mortality risk was significantly associated with older age, lower body-mass index, alcohol intake, history of hypertension, and acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Conclusions: The frequency of causes of death in people with type 2 diabetes identified in this study was similar to that from a recent survey on causes of death conducted by the Japan Diabetes Society. A lower body-mass index, alcohol intake, history of hypertension, and AMI were found to be associated with an increased total risk of type 2 diabetes. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13340-023-00628-y.

4.
J Diabetes Investig ; 14(7): 907-916, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37017193

ABSTRACT

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Non-attendance from regular medical care is a major problem in diabetes patients. This study aimed to examine the impact of a multifaceted lifestyle intervention by face-to-face approach (FFA) on non-attendance from regular medical care in comparison with that by telephone from the technical support center (TSC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was secondary analysis from a 1-year, prospective, cluster randomized, intervention study. Patients with type 2 diabetes, who were regularly visiting primary care physicians cluster-randomized into the control or intervention (TSC or FFA according to resource availability of the district medical associations) groups, were consecutively recruited. The primary end-point was non-attendance from regular medical care. The interaction between the type of intervention (TSC vs FFA) and behavioral change stage (pre- vs post-action stage) in diet and exercise for the dropout rate was assessed. RESULTS: Among the 1,915 participants (mean age 56 ± 6 years; 36% women) enrolled, 828, 564 and 264 patients belonged to the control, TSC and FFA groups, respectively. We found evidence suggestive of an interaction between the intervention type and behavioral change stage in diet (P = 0.042) and exercise (P = 0.038) after adjusting for covariates. The hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) of FFA to TSC were 0.21 (0.05-0.93) and 7.69 (0.50-117.78) in the pre-action and post-action stages for diet, respectively, whereas they were 0.20 (0.05-0.92) and 4.75 (0.29-73.70) in the pre-action and post-action stages for exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Among diabetes patients, the impact of multifaceted intervention on non-attendance from medical care might differ by the behavioral change stage.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Japan , Prospective Studies , Transtheoretical Model , Life Style
5.
J Diabetes Investig ; 14(3): 489-493, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36625362

ABSTRACT

Patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection receiving antiretroviral therapy can develop autoimmune diseases, referred to as immune-inflammatory reconstitution syndrome. Nevertheless, only a few reports on the onset of type 1 diabetes as immune-inflammatory reconstitution syndrome are available. A 40-year-old Japanese man with HIV infection was initiated with antiretroviral therapy at the age of 29 years. He developed Graves' disease at 35 years and diabetes, with a hemoglobin A1c of 6.5%, and maintained insulin secretion at 38 years. His antiglutamic acid decarboxylase antibody level was >2,000 U/mL, and he was diagnosed with slowly progressive type 1 diabetes. At the age of 40 years, he was admitted to our hospital with diabetic ketosis. We retrospectively assayed his stored plasma samples for thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibody and antiglutamic acid decarboxylase antibody, which showed positive conversion after initiating antiretroviral therapy, suggesting that Graves' disease and type 1 diabetes developed as a probable result of immune-inflammatory reconstitution syndrome.


Subject(s)
Carboxy-Lyases , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Graves Disease , HIV Infections , Male , Humans , Adult , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Graves Disease/complications , Graves Disease/drug therapy , Graves Disease/diagnosis
6.
JMA J ; 5(4): 427-437, 2022 Oct 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36407070

ABSTRACT

Introduction: This study explored the psychological and situational factors affecting dropout from regular visits to diabetes care using data obtained from the Japan Diabetes Outcome Intervention Trial 2 (J-DOIT2) Large-scale Trial (LT). Methods: A total of 2,031 patients with type 2 diabetes who participated in the J-DOIT2-LT were included in the analysis. Responses to a baseline questionnaire with 17 items asking about the experience of dropout from regular visits in diabetes care and its reasons were analyzed using principal component analysis, and factors related to dropout were extracted. Using Cox regression analysis, the association of these factors with the incidence of dropout was investigated. Results: The mean age of the 2,031 patients was 56.4 ± 5.9 years and 742 (36.5%) were women. They were followed for a median of 392 days, and 125 patients dropped out from regular visits during the follow-up period. In the principal component analysis of the questionnaire, there were four latent factors with eigenvalues of >1.0, which were labeled as "negative perceptions for regular visits," "social pressure," "lack of perceived necessity," and "environmental obstacles" based on the retained items. The Cox regression analysis demonstrated that patients with high scores of "lack of perceived necessity" and "environmental obstacles" had a significantly increased risk of dropout from regular visits. Conclusions: The present study revealed psychological and situational factors related to dropout, which may be useful for detecting patients at high risk of dropout. Effective measures focusing on such patients to prevent dropouts should be investigated in future studies (The trial registration number: UMIN000002186, registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trials Registry).

7.
Infect Dis Ther ; 11(3): 1075-1087, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35307811

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Several randomized controlled trials have compared the effectiveness of favipiravir with that of placebo. However, evidence regarding its effect on nonsevere, early-stage coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains insufficient. METHODS: We used the COVID-19 Registry Japan, a nationwide registry of inpatients with COVID-19, for evaluating the effectiveness of favipiravir on patients with nonsevere, early-stage COVID-19. Eligible patients, who did not need supplementary oxygen therapy at admission, were classified according to two regimens (starting favipiravir therapy within 4 days from admission vs. no favipiravir during hospitalization) and were then compared using a three-step method (cloning, censoring, and weighting). The primary outcome was supplementary oxygen requirement during hospitalization, and the secondary outcomes were the need for invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (IMV/ECMO) and overall mortality at 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 7654 cases were analyzed. The "start favipiravir" regimen did not show substantial differences in the primary outcome [hazard ratio 0.825, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.657-1.04, p = 0.098] and both of the secondary outcomes [need for IMV/ECMO and overall 30-day mortality, hazard ratio 1.02 (95% CI 0.649-1.60) and 0.869 (95% CI 0.519-1.46), p = 0.929 and 0.594, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort from a COVID-19 registry, favipiravir was not associated with a positive effect on the clinical outcome on patients with nonsevere, early-stage COVID-19, suggesting that it is not an essential drug for COVID-19 treatment.

8.
Acta Diabetol ; 59(6): 793-801, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35279754

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Workplace demands, support, and relationships differ according to employment status (e.g., employment that is full-time, part-time, or self-employed) and may lead to unequal opportunities to keep diabetic appointments. We investigated the association between employment status and outpatient diabetic appointment non-attendance among working-age adults with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized trial (the Japan diabetes outcome intervention trial 2 large-scale trial). The analysis included 2010 trial participants (40-65 years old) with type 2 diabetes who were regularly followed by primary care physicians (PCPs). The outcome measure was the first non-attendance (defined as a failure to visit a PCP within 2 months of the original appointment) during the one-year follow-up. The association between baseline employment status and non-attendance was examined using Cox proportional hazard model in men and women. RESULTS: During the 1279 and 789 person-year follow-up periods, 90 men and 34 women, respectively, experienced their first appointment non-attendance. Among men, self-employed participants had a higher risk of non-attendance compared with full-time employees (adjusted HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.15, 2.95). The trial intervention (attendance promotion) was associated with a significantly reduced risk of non-attendance among self-employed participants (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.26, 0.99). Among women, a significant association between employment status and non-attendance was not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Self-employed men with type 2 diabetes had a twofold increased risk of non-attendance than did full-time employees. Our study suggests that self-employed men with type 2 diabetes should be targeted for interventions promoting appointment adherence.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Adult , Aged , Appointments and Schedules , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Employment , Female , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients
9.
Lancet Reg Health West Pac ; 22: 100421, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35300186

ABSTRACT

Background: Before widespread coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccinations, Japan experienced three COVID-19 epidemic waves. This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of hospitalised COVID-19 patients and reveal temporal changes. Methods: This study included 33,554 hospitalised patients with COVID-19 from 553 healthcare facilities. Data were analysed by age group and epidemic wave (first wave, 01/01/2020-05/31/2020; second wave, 06/01/2020-10/31/2020; and third wave, 11/01/2020-03/31/2021). Findings: By age group, 3% (under 18), 22% (young), 34% (middle-aged), and 41% (older patients) were aged 0-17, 18-39, 40-64, and >65 years; while 16%, 35%, and 49% were in the first, second, and third wave, respectively. The patients' overall median age (58 years; interquartile range, 39-74) was lowest and highest during the second and third waves, respectively. The frequency of any comorbidity was lowest and highest during the second (44·5%) and third (63·6%) waves, respectively. The symptoms at admission and exposure history differed considerably with age. The overall case fatality rate (5%) was highest among older patients (11·4%). Case fatality rate was highest and lowest during the first (7·3%) and second (2·8%) waves, respectively. Medication use changed over time. Interpretation: Although the overall case fatality rate remained relatively low, it was more than twice as high among older patients. After adjusting for age and comorbidities, the risk of death was highest in the first wave. Funding: This work was supported by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare "Research on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases and Immunization" 19HA1003].

10.
Int J Infect Dis ; 118: 119-125, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35192953

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of remdesivir in the early stage of nonsevere COVID-19. Although several randomized controlled trials have compared the effectiveness of remdesivir with that of a placebo, there is limited evidence regarding its effect in the early stage of nonsevere COVID-19 cases. METHODS: We evaluated the effectiveness of remdesivir in the early stage of nonsevere COVID-19 using the COVID-19 Registry Japan, a nationwide registry of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Japan. Two regimens ("start remdesivir" therapy within 4 days from admission versus no remdesivir during hospitalization) among patients without the need for supplementary oxygen therapy were compared by a 3-step processing (cloning, censoring, and weighting) method. The primary outcome was a supplementary oxygen requirement during hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were 30-day in-hospital mortality and the risk of invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (IMV/ECMO). The data of 12,487 cases met our inclusion criteria. The "start remdesivir" regimen showed a lower risk of supplementary oxygen requirement (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.850, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.798-0.906, p value < 0.001). Both 30-day in-hospital mortality and risk of IMV/ECMO introduction were not significantly different between the 2 regimens (HRs: 1.04 and 0.983, 95% CI: 0.980-1.09 and 0.906-1.07, p values: 0.210 and 0.678, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Remdesivir might reduce the risk of oxygen requirement during hospitalization in the early stage of COVID-19; however, it had no positive effect on the clinical outcome and reduction in IMV/ECMO requirement.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Adenosine Monophosphate/analogs & derivatives , Alanine/analogs & derivatives , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Oxygen , Registries , SARS-CoV-2
11.
Int J Infect Dis ; 112: 111-116, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34517044

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether anticoagulation therapy improves outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Japan given their lower risk of thrombosis compared with Western cohorts. METHODS: The efficacy of anticoagulation therapy in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 was evaluated using a nationwide registry: the COVID-19 Registry Japan. The inverse probability of weight treatment method was used to adjust for baseline confounders in the anticoagulation and non-anticoagulation groups. RESULTS: Of the 1748 patients included, anticoagulants were used in 367 patients (treatment group). The patients in the anticoagulant group were older, predominantly male, and often presented with obesity, hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, diabetes and elevated D-dimer levels. Twenty-nine-day mortality was 7.6% in the whole cohort (treatment group, 11.2%; no treatment group, 6.6%), 6% in patients who were not treated with steroids (treatment group, 12.3%; no treatment group, 5.2%), and 11.2% in patients treated with steroids (treatment group, 10.5%; no treatment group, 11.8%). Mortality in the whole cohort was similar between the treatment and no treatment groups (P=0.99), and an insignificant decreasing trend in mortality was observed in patients treated with steroids (P=0.075). CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulants may be beneficial in Asians, in whom comorbidities and risk of thrombosis may differ from other ethnic groups.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Blood Coagulation , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , SARS-CoV-2
12.
J Telemed Telecare ; 27(5): 307-313, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33966526

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the impact of a telephone support programme with telemonitoring on changes in healthy eating and active exercise in adults with prediabetes using the stage of change framework. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis using data from the Japan Diabetes Outcome Trial-1. A total of 2607 participants aged 20-65 years with impaired fasting glucose were recruited from the workplace/community in Japan and randomized to a one year telephone support programme intervention arm (n = 1240) or self-directed control arm (n = 1367). Participants in both arms received monthly data feedback from a weight scale and pedometer. The main outcome measure was the stages of change toward healthy eating and active exercise. The secondary outcome was fasting plasma glucose (FPG). RESULTS: After the one year intervention, the adjusted odds ratio of progressing to the action/maintenance stage in the intervention vs. control arm for healthy eating was 1.31 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-1.43; p < 0.001), but that for active exercise was 1.07 (95% CI 0.99-1.15; p = 0.062). The intervention decreased FPG levels in participants in the contemplation stage, but not in the precontemplation, preparation and action/maintenance stages. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that the telephone support programme by healthcare providers advanced the stage of changes toward healthy eating in people with prediabetes. In particular, it decreased FPG levels in the contemplation stage.


Subject(s)
Diet, Healthy , Prediabetic State , Adult , Behavior Therapy , Humans , Japan , Prediabetic State/therapy , Telephone
13.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(11): e3677-e3689, 2021 12 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32986793

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is limited understanding of the characteristics of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring hospitalization in Japan. METHODS: This study included 2638 cases enrolled from 227 healthcare facilities that participated in the COVID-19 Registry Japan (COVIREGI-JP). The inclusion criteria for enrollment of a case in COVIREGI-JP are both (1) a positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) test and (2) inpatient treatment at a healthcare facility. RESULTS: The median age of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 was 56 years (interquartile range [IQR], 40-71 years). More than half of cases were male (58.9%, 1542/2619). Nearly 60% of the cases had close contact to confirmed or suspected cases of COVID-19. The median duration of symptoms before admission was 7 days (IQR, 4-10 days). The most common comorbidities were hypertension (15%, 396/2638) and diabetes without complications (14.2%, 374/2638). The number of nonsevere cases (68.2%, n = 1798) was twice the number of severe cases (31.8%, n = 840) at admission. The respiratory support during hospitalization includes those who received no oxygen support (61.6%, 1623/2636) followed by those who received supplemental oxygen (29.9%, 788/2636) and invasive mechanical ventilation/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (8.5%, 225/2636). Overall, 66.9% (1762/2634) of patients were discharged home, while 7.5% (197/2634) died. CONCLUSIONS: We identified the clinical epidemiological features of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients in Japan. When compared with existing inpatient studies in other countries, these results demonstrated fewer comorbidities and a trend towards lower mortality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Aged , Hospitalization , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , SARS-CoV-2
15.
BMC Res Notes ; 13(1): 375, 2020 Aug 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32771041

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Frequent self-weighing is associated with weight loss and maintenance, but the relationship between frequent self-weighing and the incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains unclear. The study aim was to examine the association between self-weighing frequency and the incidence of T2D in people with impaired fasting glucose (IFG). RESULTS: We tested the hypothesis that self-weighing frequency and the incidence of T2D are associated in 2607 people with IFG (1240 in the intervention arm; 1367 in the self-directed control arm). Both arms received a weighing scale with storage function. Healthcare providers offered a one-year goal-focused lifestyle intervention via phone. Participants were divided into 4 categories based on self-weighing frequency (No data sent [reference group], low: < 2 times/week, middle: 3-4 times/week, and high: 5-7 times/week). The adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. In the intervention arm, middle- and high-frequency self-weighing were associated with a decreased incidence of T2D relative to the reference group (AHR = 0.56, 95% CI [0.32, 0.98] and AHR = 0.43, 95% CI [0.25, 0.74], respectively). In the control arm, high-frequency self-weighing was also associated with a decreased incidence of T2D relative to the reference group (AHR = 0.54, 95% CI [0.35, 0.83]). Trial registration This trial has been registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000000662).


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Prediabetic State , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Life Style , Weight Loss
16.
J Occup Health ; 62(1): e12109, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32515888

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Using annual health check-up data, the aim of this study was to identify target populations for lifestyle interventions to effectively prevent diabetes in a real-world setting. METHODS: The Japan Diabetes Outcome Intervention Trial-1, a prospective, cluster-randomized controlled trial, was launched to test if year-long telephone-delivered lifestyle support by health professionals can prevent the development of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in people with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) identified at health check-ups. A total of 2607 participants aged 20-65 years with IFG were randomized to an intervention arm (n = 1240) or a control arm (n = 1367). We performed subgroup analysis to examine the effects of the intervention on the incidence of T2D in participants with body mass index (BMI) ≥25, metabolic syndrome (MetS), and non-alcoholic or alcoholic elevated liver enzymes at the baseline. Cox regression analysis adjusted for sex was used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs). RESULTS: In addition to IFG, the presence of BMI ≥25, MetS, and elevated liver enzymes increased the incidence of diabetes by two- or three-fold. During a median follow-up period of 4.9 years, only the non-alcoholic elevated liver enzyme group showed a low incidence rate owing to lifestyle interventions (adjusted HR: 0.42, 95% confidence interval: 0.18-0.98). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that people who have IFG and non-alcoholic elevated liver enzymes are a good target population for lifestyle interventions to effectively reduce the incidence of diabetes in a real-world setting.


Subject(s)
Alanine Transaminase/blood , Aspartate Aminotransferases/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/prevention & control , Life Style , Metabolic Syndrome/complications , Obesity/complications , Preventive Health Services/methods , Adult , Aged , Female , Glucose Intolerance/blood , Humans , Incidence , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Telephone
17.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 2842, 2020 02 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32071329

ABSTRACT

We aimed to assess whether a triple-faceted intervention program administered in the primary care setting could decrease the risk of insufficient adherence to primary care physician (PCP) appointments among this patient population. We conducted a cluster-randomized controlled study to assess the effects of a 1-year intervention. The primary outcome was insufficient adherence to regular PCP attendance for diabetes treatment, defined as failure to visit a PCP within 2 months of an original appointment date. The intervention consisted of mailing patient reminders of their PCP appointments, providing patients with health education aimed at lifestyle modification and benchmarking PCP procedures. Eleven municipal level district medical associations employing 192 PCPs were divided into two subregions for assignment to intervention and control clusters, with 971 and 1,265 patients assigned to the intervention and control groups, respectively. Primary outcome data were available for 2,200 patients. The intervention reduced insufficient adherence to regular PCP appointments by 63% (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.58). In conclusion, a triple-faceted intervention program consisting of health education, appointment reminders, and physician benchmarking may decrease the risk of incomplete adherence to regular PCP appointments by diabetes patients.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Physicians, Primary Care , Prediabetic State/epidemiology , Adult , Appointments and Schedules , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/physiopathology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/psychology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance/psychology , Prediabetic State/physiopathology , Prediabetic State/psychology , Prediabetic State/therapy , Text Messaging
18.
J Health Psychol ; 25(3): 350-360, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28810485

ABSTRACT

We evaluated the associations of risk perception, self-efficacy, and trust with two health promotion behaviors (food habits and exercise) and depressive mood. Diabetic patients aged between 40 and 64 (n = 1195) were included in the analyses. Risk perception worsened behavioral changes in terms of food habits and depression, whereas self-efficacy and trust improved food habits, exercise, and depression; trust improved exercise and depression. In conclusion, self-efficacy and trust appear to be more beneficial than risk perception for positive behavioral changes and for improving depression in diabetic patients. However, their influence on behavioral changes may be different according to the types of behaviors.


Subject(s)
Depression/psychology , Diabetes Mellitus/psychology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Physician-Patient Relations , Risk Reduction Behavior , Self Efficacy , Trust/psychology , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
19.
Metab Syndr Relat Disord ; 17(7): 355-361, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31145031

ABSTRACT

Background: Evidence of the long-term benefits of telephone-delivered lifestyle interventions is limited. This study investigated the ability of telephone-delivered lifestyle intervention to reduce the incidence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in subjects diagnosed with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) during health checkups. Methods: Our subjects were participants in the Japan Diabetes Outcome Intervention Trial-1 (J-DOIT1), a prospective, cluster-randomized controlled trial designed to investigate whether goal-focused lifestyle coaching over the telephone can effectively reduce the incidence of type 2 diabetes development in high-risk individuals in a primary health care setting. We extracted 753 and 844 J-DOIT1 participants from the intervention and controls arms, respectively, who had IFG but did not meet the MetS criteria at baseline. The intervention arm received goal-focused lifestyle support delivered by health care providers via telephone over a 1-year period. The endpoint was the development of incident MetS, defined based on the Adult Treatment Panel III criteria modified for Japan. Results: During the median follow-up period of 4.9 years, 8.0% of the intervention arm and 12.0% of the control arm developed MetS. Overall, the hazard ratio (HR) for the development of MetS was 0.75 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52-1.09; P = 0.14] in the intervention arm. However, the HR in overweight or obese [body mass index (BMI) ≥23 kg/m2] individuals was significantly reduced to 0.63 (95% CI, 0.41-0.95; P = 0.029), but not in lean (BMI <23 kg/m2) individuals. Conclusion: Telephone-delivered lifestyle intervention effectively reduced the incidence of MetS in overweight and obese subjects in a real-world setting. Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000000662 (registered March 30, 2007; https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000000798).


Subject(s)
Counseling/methods , Life Style , Metabolic Syndrome/prevention & control , Prediabetic State/therapy , Preventive Health Services/methods , Telephone , Adult , Aged , Cluster Analysis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/prevention & control , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Program Evaluation , Risk Reduction Behavior , Young Adult
20.
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol ; 5(12): 951-964, 2017 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29079252

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Limited evidence suggests that multifactorial interventions for control of glucose, blood pressure, and lipids reduce macrovascular complications and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, safe and effective treatment targets for these risk factors have not been determined for such interventions. METHODS: In this multicentre, open-label, randomised, parallel-group trial, undertaken at 81 clinical sites in Japan, we randomly assigned (1:1) patients with type 2 diabetes aged 45-69 years with hypertension, dyslipidaemia, or both, and an HbA1c of 6·9% (52·0 mmol/mol) or higher, to receive conventional therapy for glucose, blood pressure, and lipid control (targets: HbA1c <6·9% [52·0 mmol/mol], blood pressure <130/80 mm Hg, LDL cholesterol <120 mg/dL [or 100 mg/dL in patients with a history of coronary artery disease]) or intensive therapy (HbA1c <6·2% [44·3 mmol/mol], blood pressure <120/75 mm Hg, LDL cholesterol <80 mg/dL [or 70 mg/dL in patients with a history of coronary artery disease]). Randomisation was done using a computer-generated, dynamic balancing method, stratified by sex, age, HbA1c, and history of cardiovascular disease. Neither patients nor investigators were masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was occurrence of any of a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularisation (coronary artery bypass surgery, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, carotid endarterectomy, percutaneous transluminal cerebral angioplasty, and carotid artery stenting), and all-cause mortality. The primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00300976. FINDINGS: Between June 16, 2006, and March 31, 2009, 2542 eligible patients were randomly assigned to intensive therapy or conventional therapy (1271 in each group) and followed up for a median of 8·5 years (IQR 7·3-9·0). Two patients in the intensive therapy group were found to be ineligible after randomisation and were excluded from the analyses. During the intervention period, mean HbA1c, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and LDL cholesterol concentrations were significantly lower in the intensive therapy group than in the conventional therapy group (6·8% [51·0 mmol/mol] vs 7·2% [55·2 mmol/mol]; 123 mm Hg vs 129 mm Hg; 71 mm Hg vs 74 mm Hg; and 85 mg/dL vs 104 mg/dL, respectively; all p<0·0001). The primary outcome occurred in 109 patients in the intensive therapy group and in 133 patients in the conventional therapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·81, 95% CI 0·63-1·04; p=0·094). In a post-hoc breakdown of the composite outcome, frequencies of all-cause mortality (HR 1·01, 95% CI 0·68-1·51; p=0·95) and coronary events (myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery, and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty; HR 0·86, 0·58-1·27; p=0·44) did not differ between groups, but cerebrovascular events (stroke, carotid endarterectomy, percutaneous transluminal cerebral angioplasty, and carotid artery stenting) were significantly less frequent in the intensive therapy group (HR 0·42, 0·24-0·74; p=0·002). Apart from non-severe hypoglycaemia (521 [41%] patients in the intensive therapy group vs 283 [22%] in the conventional therapy group, p<0·0001) and oedema (193 [15%] vs 129 [10%], p=0·0001), the frequencies of major adverse events did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION: Our results do not fully support the efficacy of further intensified multifactorial intervention compared with current standard care for the prevention of a composite of coronary events, cerebrovascular events, and all-cause mortality. Nevertheless, our findings suggest a potential benefit of an intensified intervention for the prevention of cerebrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. FUNDING: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Kissei Pharmaceutical, Kowa Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mochida Pharmaceutical, MSD, Novartis Pharma, Novo Nordisk, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho, Shionogi, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical, and Takeda.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cardiovascular Diseases/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/mortality , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Early Medical Intervention/trends , Aged , Causality , Early Medical Intervention/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality/trends , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...