Early intensive mobilization after acute high-risk abdominal surgery: a nonrandomized prospective feasibility trial.

BACKGROUND: Mobilization after emergency abdominal surgery is considered essential to facilitate rehabilitation and reduce postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of early intensive mobilization after acute high-risk abdominal (AHA) surgery. METHODS: We conducted a nonrandomized, prospective feasibility trial of consecutive patients after AHA surgery at a university hospital in Denmark. The participants followed a predefined, interdisciplinary protocol for early intensive mobilization during the first 7 postoperative days (PODs) of their hospital admission. We evaluated feasibility in accordance with the percentage of patients who mobilized within 24 hours after surgery, mobilized at least 4 times per day and achieved daily goals of time out of bed and walking distance. RESULTS: We included 48 patients with a mean age of 61 (standard deviation 17) years (48% female). Within 24 hours after surgery, 92% of the patients were mobilized and 82% or more were mobilized at least 4 times per day over the first 7 PODs. On PODs 1-3, 70%-89% of the participants achieved the daily goals of mobilization; participants still in hospital after POD 3 were less able to achieve the daily goals. Patient reported that the primary factors limiting their level of mobilization were fatigue, pain and dizziness. Participants not mobilized independently on POD 3 (28%) had significantly (p ≤ 0.04) fewer hours out of bed (4 v. 8 h), were less able to achieve the goals of time out of bed (45% v. 95%) and walking distance (62% v. 94%) and had longer hospital stays (14 v. 6 d) than participants mobilized independently on POD 3. CONCLUSION: The early intensive mobilization protocol seems feasible for most patients after AHA surgery. For nonindependent patients, however, alternative mobilization strategies and goals should be investigated.

Validation of Two Activity Monitors in Slow and Fast Walking Hospitalized Patients.

To evaluate interventions to promote physical activity, valid outcome measures are important. This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the ActivPAL3™ and the SENS motion® activity monitors with regard to the number of steps taken, walking, and sedentary behavior in hospitalized patients (n = 36) (older medical patients (+65 years) (n = 12), older patients (+65) with acute hip fracture (n = 12), and patients (+18) who underwent acute high-risk abdominal surgery (n = 12)). Both monitors showed good (≥60%) percentage agreement with direct observation for standing and no. of steps (all gait speeds) and high agreement (≥80%) for lying. For walking, ActivPAL3™ showed moderate percentage agreement, whereas SENS motion® reached high percentage agreement. The relative reliability was moderate for sedentary behavior for both monitors. The ActivPAL3™ showed poor (walking) to moderate (steps) reliability for walking and steps, whereas SENS motion® showed moderate reliability for both activities. For slow walkers, the relative reliability was moderate for SENS motion® and poor for ActivPAL3™. This trial is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04120740.

Interrater reliability of the standardized Timed Up and Go Test when used in hospitalized and community-dwelling older individuals.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the interrater reliability and measurement error of the standardized Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test manual using the fastest of the three timed TUG trials in hospitalized and community-dwelling older individuals. METHODS: Thirty participants (19 from a hospital and 11 from an outpatient geriatric centre: 20 women, 10 men), 65 years or older, all of whom had been referred to physiotherapy due to a functional decline, were included. All participants performed the TUG Test across two sessions (three trials in each) on the same day, separated by a minimum of 30 min. The two raters were blinded to each other's ratings until the end of the study, and the rater order was randomized. RESULTS: Participants from the outpatient centre had a higher prereferral functional level when evaluated with the New Mobility Score and performed the TUG Test significantly faster than the hospital group. Accordingly, reliability estimates are reported for each specific group. Interrater reliability was excellent for both groups (intraclass correlation coefficient2.1  ≥ 0.93), and no systematic between-rater difference for obtained TUG times was found. The measurement error was acceptable both at the group (standard error of measurement [SEM] = 1.7 s and SEM% = 8 [hospital] vs. 0.7 s and 6 [outpatient]) and the individual (minimal detectable change [MDC95 ] = 4.6 s and MDC95 % = 23 [hospital] vs. 1.8 s and 17 [outpatient]) level. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that using the fastest of the three TUG trials is highly reliable between raters and with acceptable measurement error. We, therefore, suggest that the standardized TUG manual with the fastest of the three timed trials be used for the assessment of functional mobility in hospitalized and community-dwelling older individuals.

Physical performance following acute high-risk abdominal surgery: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Acute high-risk abdominal (AHA) surgery is associated with high mortality, multiple postoperative complications and prolonged hospital stay. Further development of strategies for enhanced recovery programs following AHA surgery is needed. The aim of this study was to describe physical performance and barriers to independent mobilization among patients who received AHA surgery (postoperative days [POD] 1-7). METHODS: Patients undergoing AHA surgery were consecutively enrolled from a university hospital in Denmark. In the first postoperative week, all patients were evaluated daily with regards to physical performance, using the Cumulated Ambulation Score (CAS; 0-6 points) to assess basic mobility and the activPAL monitor to assess the 24-hour physical activity level. We recorded barriers to independent mobilization. RESULTS: Fifty patients undergoing AHA surgery (mean age 61.4 ± 17.2 years) were included. Seven patients died within the first postoperative week, and 15 of 43 (35%) patients were still not independently mobilized (CAS < 6) on POD-7, which was associated with pulmonary complications developing (53% v. 14% in those with CAS = 6, p = 0.012). The patients lay or sat for a median of 23.4 hours daily during the first week after AHA surgery, and the main barriers to independent mobilization were fatigue and abdominal pain. CONCLUSION: Patients who receive AHA surgery have very limited physical performance in the first postoperative week. Barriers to independent mobilization are primarily fatigue and abdominal pain. Further studies investigating strategies for early mobilization and barriers to mobilization in the immediate postoperative period after AHA surgery are needed.

CONTEXTE: La chirurgie abdominale d'urgence à risque élevé est associée à un fort taux de mortalité, à des complications postopératoires multiples et à des hospitalisations prolongées. Il est donc nécessaire d'élaborer de nouvelles stratégies pour améliorer le rétablissement après ce type de chirurgie. La présente étude visait à décrire le fonctionnement physique et les obstacles aux déplacements autonomes chez les patients ayant subi une chirurgie de ce type (jours postopératoires 1 à 7). MÉTHODES: Nous avons recruté successivement les patients subissant une chirurgie abdominale d'urgence à risque élevé dans un hôpital universitaire du Danemark. Durant la première semaine postopératoire, tous les patients ont subi quotidiennement une évaluation visant à vérifier leur fonctionnement physique. Nous nous sommes servis du Cumulated Ambulation Score (CAS; de 0 à 6 points) pour évaluer la mobilité de base et du moniteur activPAL pour évaluer le niveau d'activé physique 24 heures par jour. Nous avons noté les obstacles aux déplacements autonomes. RÉSULTATS: Cinquante patients (âge moyen : 61,4 ans ± 17,2) ont été retenus. Sept sont décédés durant la première semaine postopératoire, et 15 des 43 patients restants (35 %) ne se déplaçaient pas encore de façon autonome (CAS < 6) le septième jour, une situation associée à l'apparition de complications pulmonaires (53 % c. 14 % de ceux qui avaient un CAS de 6, p = 0,012). Les patients étaient couchés ou assis pendant une durée médiane de 23,4 heures par jour durant la première semaine postopératoire, et les principaux obstacles aux déplacements autonomes étaient la fatigue et la douleur abdominale. CONCLUSION: Les patients qui subissent une chirurgie abdominale d'urgence à risque élevé ont un fonctionnement physique très faible durant la première semaine postopératoire. Les obstacles aux déplacements autonomes sont principalement la fatigue et la douleur abdominale. Il faudra d'autres études sur les stratégies de mobilisation précoces et les obstacles aux déplacements peu après une chirurgie abdominale d'urgence à risque élevé.

Cumulated Ambulation Score to evaluate mobility is feasible in geriatric patients and in patients with hip fracture.

INTRODUCTION: Regaining basic mobility independence is considered important for elderly hospitalised patients. The Cumulated Ambulation Score (CAS) is a valid tool for evaluating these patients' basic mobility (getting in and out of bed, sit-to-stand from a chair and walking) in orthopaedic wards, and its use is recommended in Denmark for patients with hip fracture. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the feasibility of the CAS in a geriatric ward and to describe its use after hip fracture in Denmark. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 101 consecutive patients (with a mean age of 84.9 (standard deviation 7.2) years) were evaluated with the CAS upon admission and at discharge from a geriatric ward, while data concerning the use of the CAS after hip fracture were collected from national Danish reports. RESULTS: All geriatric patients could be evaluated with the CAS. A total of 41% were independent in terms of basic mobility at admission and 83% of patients at discharge from the ward (p < 0.001). Patients who were not independent in basic mobility upon admission died more often during admission or were more often not discharged to their own home than patients who were independent in basic mobility. National data from the year 2010 showed that the CAS was reported by 21 (78%) of the 27 hospitals and used in 92% of the hospitals that will be treating patients with hip fracture in the future. CONCLUSION: In geriatric wards, the CAS is a feasible tool for evaluating all patients' basic mobility, and we recommend that it be used in other settings and at all hospitals treating patients with hip fracture.