Challenges in the Management of Kidney Allograft Herniation With a Single-stage Pedicled Anterolateral Thigh Flap.

Wound complications are the most common surgical complication after kidney allograft transplantation. Total wound rupture exposing the entire kidney is a rare and not well-described event. We present a successful treatment of this complication in a patient admitted to our unit. A single-stage procedure was performed combining debridement and reconstruction with a pedicled anterolateral thigh flap and an iliotibial band transferring. A short literature review is performed comparing the different treatment strategies and results.

Mycophenolate pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in belatacept treated renal allograft recipients - a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is widely used as part of immunosuppressive regimens following allograft transplantation. The large pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) variability and narrow therapeutic range of MPA provide a potential for therapeutic drug monitoring. The objective of this pilot study was to investigate the MPA PK and PD relation in combination with belatacept (2nd generation CTLA4-Ig) or cyclosporine (CsA). METHODS: Seven renal allograft recipients were randomized to either belatacept (n = 4) or cyclosporine (n = 3) based immunosuppression. Samples for MPA PK and PD evaluations were collected predose and at 1, 2 and 13 weeks posttransplant. Plasma concentrations of MPA were determined by HPLC-UV. Activity of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) and the expressions of two IMPDH isoforms were measured in CD4+ cells by HPLC-UV and real-time reverse-transcription PCR, respectively. Subsets of T cells were characterized by flow cytometry. RESULTS: The MPA exposure tended to be higher among belatacept patients than in CsA patients at week 1 (P = 0.057). Further, MPA concentrations (AUC0-9 h and C0) increased with time in both groups and were higher at week 13 than at week 2 (P = 0.031, n = 6). In contrast to the postdose reductions of IMPDH activity observed early posttransplant, IMPDH activity within both treatment groups was elevated throughout the dosing interval at week 13. Transient postdose increments were also observed for IMPDH1 expression, starting at week 1. Higher MPA exposure was associated with larger elevations of IMPDH1 (r = 0.81, P = 0.023, n = 7 for MPA and IMPDH1 AUC0-9 h at week 1). The maximum IMPDH1 expression was 52 (13-177)% higher at week 13 compared to week 1 (P = 0.031, n = 6). One patient showed lower MPA exposure with time and did neither display elevations of IMPDH activity nor IMPDH1 expression. No difference was observed in T cell subsets between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The significant influence of MPA on IMPDH1 expression, possibly mediated through reduced guanine nucleotide levels, could explain the elevations of IMPDH activity within dosing intervals at week 13. The present regulation of IMPDH in CD4+ cells should be considered when interpreting measurements of IMPDH inhibition.

Systemic administration of enamel matrix derivative to lipopolysaccharide-challenged pigs: effects on the inflammatory response.

BACKGROUND: Periodontitis is the primary clinical indication for enamel matrix derivative (EMD). Recent investigations, showing that EMD inhibits the production of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) when added to human whole blood, indicate a novel role for EMD as a modulator of systemic inflammation. In the present study, we investigated the systemic effects of EMD in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-challenged pigs. METHODS: In a preparatory study, seven pigs received a prophylactic EMD bolus injection (5 mg/kg), followed by a continuous infusion (50 mg/kg/min). Thirty minutes later, a continuous infusion of LPS (1.7 mcg/kg/h) was started. An additional 12 pigs were randomized into two groups. Six of these animals were given the same treatment, except that EMD was administered 30 min after LPS. The remainder served as controls. The groups were compared according to organ injury and function, hemodynamics, and systemic markers of inflammation. RESULTS: Prophylactic administration of EMD triggered transient hemodynamic instability in two of seven pigs. In the randomized pigs, no or only nonspecific changes were observed in biopsies from vital organs, independent of treatment. Enamel matrix derivative did not modify systemic TNF-alpha, interleukin (IL)-1 beta, or IL-6 concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: In the formulation and dosages used, EMD did not modulate the inflammatory response. No true allergic or immunotoxic reactions were seen. To be usable for systemic application, a new formulation should be developed, or the active part of the protein(s) should be identified and produced in a soluble form designed for infusion. The potential of EMD as a systemic immune modulator is still unsettled.